Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

McCall reveals behind the scenes talks that reignited Saracens season

(Photo by Getty Images)

Mark McCall believes clear the air talks were key to ending a seven game losing run and has put Saracens back on track to register a third successive European Champions Cup triumph this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The holders, aiming to emulate three times winners Toulon, head to Ospreys on Saturday for the penultimate pool match knowing that defeat will effectively ruin their title defence. There is a mathematical possibility of Sarries still making the quarter-finals if they lose and then beat Northampton at home in the final pool game but McCall is only interested in a win in Wales.

Back-to-back losses to Clermont Auvergne, the team they beat to retain the trophy in last season’s final, came during their losing run which has now been ended in emphatic style with wins over Leicester, Worcester and then Wasps last weekend. The return from injury of Maro Itoje, Billy Vunipola, Liam Williams and Michael Rhodes has also been vital although Scotland centre Duncan Taylor is now out with concussion and is being sent to see a specialist after suffering blows to the head in his last two games.

While the squad is starting to look similar to the one that dominated Europe last season, McCall is adamant the honesty shown during those in-house discussions involving coaches and players was the key to the improved form in recent weeks.

McCall wouldn’t got into the details of the changes that have been made but he admitted: ” It hasn’t been perfect and not without some difficult conversations. It has also been an invigorating period as well and we have been able to explore things a bit deeper and ask a few questions that we wouldn’t normally do. We had away games that were pretty daunting after the home match with Clermont (they lost 46-14). It has been Clermont, Leicester, Wasps away -Worcester at home- and now away to Ospreys. Given where we were on the night after the Clermont home defeat, I am very proud of how we reacted.

“For Ospreys it is the first time we have had some incredibly tough selection decisions to make with one back row who is missing out who has been outstanding; we have to pick three from four of our second rows as well and this is the first time this season we have had those kind of choices to make. Ospreys are a good side with experienced players at the core of their team and the weather forecast doesn’t look good. However, going away from home doesn’t bother us at all and we know we have to deserve it on the night.

“Our set piece has to be good against Ospreys and also be persistent like we were at times against Wasps and did the right things at the right time. The players want to be involved in quarter-finals. They want to be involved in those games. If we lose we won’t be. It’s as simple as that really.“

ADVERTISEMENT

The last time McCall took Sarries to the Liberty Stadium in December 2011 they won 16-13 and there was a suicide on the train line which meant cancellations. They were in a packed carriage to Swansea and only arrived 90 minutes before kick off and the players had not eaten. “Peter Stringer was playing his first match for us and said Paul O’Connell would not have accepted travelling on the day of the game, but we did win. This time we are going down on Friday:” added McCall.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 15 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING George Skivington issues injury update on prop duo George Skivington issues injury update on prop duo
Search