Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Melbourne Rebels hold player meeting following shock reports in Aussie press

Monty Ioane of the Rebels looks dejected after the round 15 Super Rugby Pacific match between the ACT Brumbies and Melbourne Rebels at GIO Stadium, on June 02, 2023, in Canberra, Australia. (Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images)

The Melbourne Rebels insist they haven’t entered voluntary administration but the move is potentially on the table for the financially-stricken Super Rugby Pacific club.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rebels chief executive Baden Stephenson addressed the playing group before training on Friday after reports emerged that the club, carrying debts of around $9 million, had formally entered into voluntary administration.

The club is believed to owe the Australian Taxation Office and about $1 million in hire fees for their home ground AAMI Park, managed by the state government’s Melbourne and Olympic Parks Trust.

A source said that Stephenson reassured the players that their contracts and salaries were guaranteed for the 2024 season, with their first game looming against the ACT Brumbies on February 23.

Melbourne have lured the likes of Wallabies star Taniela Tupou, who moved from the Queensland Reds, and former Test flanker Lukhan Salakaia-Loto, who was playing in the UK.

The Rugby Union Players Association has also met with the players to reaffirm their payments would be met under the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Stephenson also emailed club members saying the board was continuing to work with Rugby Australia on their financial situation and future.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The ongoing work with Rugby Australia is a testament to our shared commitment to ensuring the long-term viability and success of the Melbourne Rebels,” he wrote in an email.

“We assure you that our collaboration will persist as we collectively navigate the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.”

The club is working with insolvency firm Wexted Advisors, who have previously dealt with the NSW Waratahs, with the Rebels board meeting over the weekend in a bid to avoid going into administration.

Starved of revenue, the club has been hit hard by the financial woes of its key sponsor BRC Capital, whose chairman Paul Docherty also chairs the Rebels.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA have guaranteed its presence in this year’s competition but not beyond, upsetting the Melbourne club which feels it has been singled out with other Super Rugby clubs also under severe financial pressure.

Five teams are needed to satisfy the current broadcast deal, which expires at the end of the 2025 season.

Melbourne haven’t made the Super Rugby finals in 12 seasons since being brought into the competition in 2011.

The Rebels have been contacted for comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
P
Pecos 330 days ago

Cut them loose from 2025 (or amalgamate with Brumbies), strengthen to four SRP teams, get an Argentinian replacement franchise in (or from Japan), problem solved.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search