Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies watch: Michael Cheika back on the market

Pumas Coach Michael Cheika (C) shakes hands with Wallabies Coach Eddie Jones prior to The Rugby Championship match between the Australia Wallabies and Argentina at CommBank Stadium on July 15, 2023 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

Michael Cheika’s time as Los Pumas head coach has come to an end, with the team announcing his successor in former star Felipe Contepomi.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s an interesting development given the vacancy of the Wallabies head coach role, and while it was initially unclear whether Cheika had taken another job within the Argentine system, comments from the 56-year-old have since implied he will be departing the country altogether.

It was just weeks ago when the Argentine Rugby Union president, Gabriel Travaglini, insisted talks with Cheika were progressing positively in regards to a new contract that would see Cheika remain head coach, with just “some numbers” to be worked out.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However, Monday saw Travaglini release a statement with some parting words.

“Personally, and on behalf of the entire Argentine Rugby Union, I want to thank Michael Cheika for this path that we travelled together,” he said. “His professionalism, passion and dedication to Argentine rugby is something we will remember forever.

“Today we are convinced that Felipe (Contepomi) is the right person for this new road to Australia 2027. Welcome Felipe, we wish you the best and we accompany you in this great challenge that is to be the coach of Los Pumas”

Cheika’s comments help paint the picture of his departure and confirm his status as a gun for hire.

“I want to thank all Argentines for these wonderful years together, as well as the UAR, the staff and the players for having trusted me for this challenge.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Having been the head coach of Los Pumas fills me with pride and is one of the experiences that I enjoyed the most in my career as a coach. Although I was born in Australia, a large part of me will be Argentina. I am convinced that Felipe and his staff are going to lead the team in the best way.”

Related

Cheika’s credentials, along with his newfound availability, make him a top option for the Wallabies, who appear to have been comfortable taking their time to find the right candidate – perhaps waiting patiently for Cheika’s status to be confirmed.

An experienced and local head like Cheika’s would tick all the boxes for Rugby Australia, who are in desperate need of stability during their major shift in governance and program structure.

Former head coach Eddie Jones was enlisted with the aim of overseeing something of a reset in the Australian game, with the hopes of centralisation at the core of the union’s vision for the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

The recently ousted Rugby Australia chair Hamish McLennan’s departure adds spice to the Cheika-return recipe, as it’s possible Cheika shared the state union’s distrust in McLennan.

With that potential obstacle cleared, there is a clear runway for Cheika’s homecoming, and the 2015 World Cup silver medalist has been transparent about his desire to partake in the 2027 Rugby World Cup taking place on Australian soil.

“I’m still on with the (Lebanon) Cedars (rugby league team) and there’s a World Cup that will be in Australia, I think, in 2026 before the Rugby World Cup in 2027. I’m looking forward to being involved in both of those – one way or another,” he recently told The Roar.

Brumbies head coach Stephen Larkham appears to still be in the running for the job, while Leicester Tigers’ Dan McKellar has implied he will be staying put in his new role. Rumours have swirled about Andy Friend, former Springboks coach Jake White, and even recent New Zealand assistant Joe Schmidt.

Cheika’s stature in the game and knowledge of the Australian system though make him a prime candidate, whose convenient availability cannot be overlooked.

Should Cheika reassume the Wallabies’ reins, he would return to the role he gave up in 2019 having lifted Argentina to two historic wins over the All Blacks in addition to wins over both Australia and England. He would also return perhaps with more public compassion for his results during the latter end of that previous stint in green and gold.

Rugby Australia’s interest in Cheika’s services must be considered a given, but the question would be whether Cheika would be willing to take on a role that involves so much more than just leading the national team.

Eddie Jones’ aforementioned and historically unsuccessful appointment included the job of overseeing the Wallaroos program, something that Jones admitted took a back seat during his short-lived tenure.

Any preference of Cheika’s to take up a more specific role would be understandable given the scale of the undertaking, and the appointment of new full-time Wallaroos head coach Jo Yapp.

Rugby Australia’s recent desire to hire a countryman to lead the Wallaby charge would be fulfilled by Cheika’s return, and Australian fans can only hope that it’s the man’s devotion to the game he loves in the country he loves that brings him back home to steer the Wallabies through a pivotal moment in Australian rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
P
Pecos 364 days ago

The way forward ain’t backwards. Larkham if the Aussies have any sense.

R
Rouan 368 days ago

It would be a mistake for Michael Cheika to return to a tier 2 rugby country, the drama and the chaos that engulfs Rugby Australia. Personally Jake White will be an excellent coach to rebuild Australian structures and identify young players

A
Ardy 369 days ago

No Thanks…

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 58 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search