Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Mike Brown delivers a brutal put-down of Wales and Alun Wyn Jones

Mike Brown clashes with Alun Wyn Jones in 2015 (Photo by Chris Lee/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Mike Brown has delivered a damning assessment of last Saturday’s lethargic Wales performance, even accusing the legendary Alun Wyn Jones of walking during the 10-20 home defeat to England in the Guinness Six Nations. Brown was on full-back duty for Leicester Tigers at London Irish in the Gallagher Premiership not long after the round three championship match in Cardiff.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, he saw more than enough of the Test match on TV to label that Wales team as the worst he had ever seen during his time involved in the sport – and that has been a while given that Brown is a 37-year-old who earned nine of his 72 England Test caps in matches against the Welsh, emerging victorious on six occasions.

Taking a break from his busy schedule at Leicester, who host Bath next Saturday in their latest Premiership fixture, Brown appeared on this week’s RugbyPass Offload and he didn’t shy away from negatively assessing how Wales played in their defeat to England.

Video Spacer

Mike Brown and Ollie Lawrence | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 66

Video Spacer

Mike Brown and Ollie Lawrence | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 66

“It wasn’t the greatest game to watch. Wales are in a real dark place on and off the field at the moment and you could see that. They have got some work to do,” he said before being asked by presenter Marc Edwards if that was the worst Wales side he had ever seen during his time in the game?

“It has got to be,” he replied. “Just for me, they were slow and ponderous. There was one moment when their nine who actually was quite good, I can’t remember his name now, did a quick tap and he was off and gone and actually made some good metres and caught England and the whole team were like 20 metres away…

Related

“That (slowness) was why they were getting beaten at breakdown, people walking. People like Alun Wyn, who is supposed to be the talisman leader, just walking around. I don’t think they were that physical and that was why they were getting turned over at breakdown. And then no adaption of their game plan.

“You were thinking at some point they are going to change it, shift to kick it or do something different because it was just every single kick was on him [Freddie Steward] and he was never going to drop it because also there was never really any pressure as well so it was like, ‘What are they doing?’ It was strange. Yeah, such a shame to see from the Wales team, isn’t it?”

ADVERTISEMENT

That last line of his Wales assessment was delivered by Brown with his tongue very much in cheek. What, though, about England and how he believes they are faring under new head coach Steve Borthwick? “England were at ground zero and are trying to build, so you can see why they played that game plan.

“At least they were kicking with purpose. It was as minimal rucks as possible and as soon as they can’t get momentum, they were going to kick it. That is what they did and to be fair, it worked for them. They won the aerial battle, they won the breakdown battle and then off the back of that you did see glimpses of what they are trying to work on in the attack.

“They were a lot better at taking opportunities. They left a few behind out there but you can kind of see what they are doing and why they are doing it because it is basic and hopefully they build off that.

“We knew when Steve came in that was what he was going to bring. He played in a Sarries team that played that way and he was (assistant) coach with England when we played that way when Eddie (Jones) first took over, and then what he did at Leicester was playing a similar way.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That was always what he was going to bring and then hopefully he will adapt and build off that but they have got to start somewhere and at least they are kicking with purpose. At the end of Eddie’s time, they were just kicking it for the sake of it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search