Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Money no object, a New Zealand-only replacement for Super Rugby is the way forward

(Photos by Getty Images)

The current, widespread suspension of rugby across the globe is forcing a massive re-think of how the game is administered, organised and played and New Zealand Rugby must be seriously considering going it alone in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Super Rugby in its current form is coming to an end. The Sunwolves will be culled from 2021 and may have already played their last match.

Instead of the broken, somewhat confusing and entirely unfair set-up of the current conference system, Super Rugby will be reverting to a round-robin format.

Video Spacer

In this week’s episode, the team are joined by special guests Steven Luatua, Peter FitzSimons & Tim Horan.

Video Spacer

In this week’s episode, the team are joined by special guests Steven Luatua, Peter FitzSimons & Tim Horan.

There will still be fairness issues, no doubt; it’s hard to envisage that SANZAAR will stop the top ranked nation from each country progressing through to the finals because that would harm the ever-important viewership figures.

But even ignoring that, there’s a considerably greater problem at hand: the audience just don’t like Super Rugby.

Cross-country competitions work incredibly well when it’s the best of the best on display. The Heineken Cup and football’s Champion’s Cup are so popular not just because they’re European wide competitions but because teams actually have to regularly prove they belong in those competitions. That’s rarely been true for Super Rugby.

Super Rugby is no Southern Hemisphere Heineken Cup, as some folks will suggest. That may have been the case when the competition first kicked off in 1996 and the three original SANZAR nations were arguably the top three nations in the world, but now South Africa, New Zealand and Australia have as many of their players turning out for foreign clubs as they do for their local sides and the Wallabies in particular are a shadow of their former selves.

ADVERTISEMENT

If you want to compare competitions from the two Hemispheres then Super Rugby is much more akin to the Pro14, a tournament which incorporates five nations in an unusual conference format where the end result is inevitably that an Irish team will finish with the trophy.

Sound familiar to any Southern Hemisphere purists?

The Pro14 holds some significance, especially for the teams that don’t have a place in the Heineken Cup, primarily because it’s the only professional non-international rugby on offer in a calendar year. For a team like Leinster, however, who regularly rest their top players in order to keep them fresh for the considerably more illustrious Heineken’s Cup, the Pro14 is simply a sidequest.

Back to New Zealand and it’s easy to see why Super Rugby is losing it’s appeal, except when two Kiwi sides face off.

That’s not necessarily because the skills are better and the rugby itself is of a higher quality in those fixtures – though that certainly comes into it.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s simply because the players are more recognisable and familiar and viewers actually care about their success.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B9z_CjsgIu8/

There’s also the major factor that almost every player on display in a New Zealand derby is a potential All Black – and that’s what the viewers want to see; All Blacks.

It’s a powerful brand, that silver fern – the most powerful brand in world rugby, in fact. There’s a reason why NZR are so keen to slap the All Blacks moniker on every New Zealand rugby team.

Super Rugby has been heading downhill for a long time with New Zealand’s domination evident for everyone to see and now is the time to kick things up.

Conveniently, New Zealand’s provincial competition has also lost its shine in recent years, which creates a serious opportunity for NZR if they’re willing to take a risk.

If Super Rugby and the Mitre 10 Cup on both thrown on the scrap heap, New Zealand could produce the greatest domestic rugby competition in the world – one that cannot just rival but best England’s Gallagher Premiership and France’s Top 14.

As it currently stands, there are plenty of talented Kiwi players that are either forced to sit on a Super Rugby bench every week or head to other countries for game-time – players that would more than match-up to many of the men who are propping up some of the Australia and South African franchises.

The Mitre 10 Cup, which boasts 14 teams, probably stretches New Zealand’s talent a little too far. There’s a fine medium that could be found between the 14 provinces and the five Super Rugby franchises that would allow for a competitive competition that would provide enough variety, rivalry and tribalism for all to enjoy.

Merging provinces has had mixed results in the past. It’s gone very well for Tasman, who were formed by an alliance between two second division sides, Nelson Bays and Marlborough, and are now a powerhouse in the provincial game.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B_lp9KRAi-K/

Back in the 90’s, it didn’t work so well off the field for Hawke’s Bay and Manawatu when they were merged into the Central Vikings with financial issues eventually causing the side to split, but better planning and professionalism could likely solve that problem in the current day.

The major problem with this, of course, is the money factor. South Africa and Australia both have populations dwarfing New Zealand. Even if rugby isn’t quite as popular in either of those countries, the number of viewers far exceed those in NZ, particularly in South Africa, which is why the NZR are so keen to have them involved in some form or another.

But that’s overlooking the fact that a premier provincial club competition is considerably more marketable on a world scale than the current Super Rugby product.

If NZR can take their new product to America, Asia or Europe and illustrate that the rugby is of the highest quality and the All Blacks are on display in almost every fixture (especially if we’re taking the wider definition of the brand and including sevens players and B-team members), then the audience for the competition is actually significantly larger than Super Rugby’s.

It also opens the door for other complementary events such as the much-discussed North Island v South Island clash, a game between New Zealand’s Possibles and Probables, and a few one-off matches against Australian and South African teams.

It’s desperate times around the world right now and that’s forced rugby unions to start re-thinking their strategies. New Zealand Rugby could do a lot worse than focussing on their own backyard and reinvigorating the provincial game.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 2 hours ago
David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner

Why is Joe Schmidt the best option for Australia? (LONG READ)


An essay for @OJohn with love from South Africa.


OJohn keeps banging on about kiwis and Saffers and everyone else seeking to undermine and bring down Australian rugby… Blah, Blah, Blah. It’s boring and not worth responding too 99 days out of 100.


He misses the point completely that Australians either are or are not the masters of their own destiny. So to blame anyone else but themselves for what the state of Australian rugby is in - is hypocritical.


But recently, Australia has shown signs of life. Personally, I always believed they would be back at some point. At the beginning of this year I predicted that the wallabies would bounce back this year. I predicted that they would overtake England in the world rankings. I am predicting that they could finish second in the RC, could win the Lions series and could make it to a RWC final at home.


I tend to get ahead of myself when I’m excited... Ask my wife. But forgive me for getting excited about the Wallabies looking good! Is it so bad?


Like OJohn, I believe that Australia’s lands abound with natures gifts, including athletic specimens across any sporting code the Aussies compete in. It’s one of the reasons most of us don’t like Aussies. They win sh1t. Regularly. And look smug when they do...


But back to OJohn. And his banging on about the need for Australia to have an Australian coach. Here are a few highlights of his argument:


Several times I've given a list of half a dozen Australian coaches who would be more Australian than Schmidt and just as successful.

Tell me which Australian coaches would be acceptable to coach the All Blacks ......?

Because South Africans and Kiwis and Welshmen and Scotsman are all s.... scared that if an immensely talented and athletic team like Australia is ever able to harness nationalistic Australian passion with an Australian coach, you'll all be s.c.r.e.w.e.d.


And then finally – the list of 6 🥴:


Ewen McKenzie, Less Kiss, Stephen Larkham, Jim McKay, David Nucifora, Scott Wisenthal, Ben Mowen, Rod Kafer, Mick Byrne, John Manetti, Jason Gilmore, Dan McKellar.

Plus, a special request:


Keep in mind Rod MacQueen never won a Super Rugby title before he was appointed Wallaby coach but he ended up the greatest rugby coach the world has ever seen. Better than Erasmus even. Who is probably the next best.

Right. I don’t care about the tinfoil hat theories. I want to assess OJohn’s list and determine whether any of them fit the mold of a Rod Macqueen.

 

Like Rod Macqueen the following world cup winning coaches never won a Super Rugby Title:


·       David Kirk, 1987 (17 appearances for New Zealand)

·       Kitch Kristie, 1995

·       Rod Macqueen, 1999

·       Clive Woodward, 2003 (21 Appearance for England)

·       Jake White, 2007 (School Teacher)

·       Graham Henry, 2011 (School Teacher)

·       Steve Hansen, 2015 (Policeman)

·       Rassie Erasmus, 2019 (36 Appearances for South Africa)

·       Jacques Nienaber, 2023 (Physiotherapist).


I couldn't find out what Rod or Kitch did other than coach.


The only coach who has won a Super title and a World Cup?

·       Bob Dwyer, 1991 (A Tahs man wouldn’t you know!)


In fact coaches that have won super rugby titles have not won world cups. Robbie Deans. Heyneke Meyer to name just two.


I know I’m being childish, but I needed to bring this list in somehow because it’s quite obvious that whatever these coaches did before they became international level coaches is largely immaterial. Or is it?


Interestingly Ewan McKenzie (A Tah Man!) has won a Super title. And despite being a Tah Man made it into OJohn’s list. That’s two strikes for Ewan Mckenzie based on OJohn’s criteria so far. Not to mention his 50% win rate as head coach of the Wallabies between 2013 and 2014 (and the laundry list of off the field fcuk ups that swirled around the team at the time).


So Ewan is out.


I find it interesting that, as we speak, eight out of the ten top ranked men’s teams are coached by former international players:

1.      South Africa, Rassie Erasmus (36 appearances for South Africa)

2.      Ireland, Andy Farrell (8 appearances for England)

3.      New Zealand, Scott Robertson (23 appearances for New Zealan)

4.      France, Fabien Galthie (64 appearances for France)

5.      Argentina, Felipe Contemponi (87 appearances for Argentina)

6.      Scotland, Gregor Townsend (82 appearances for Scotland)

7.      England, Steve Borthwick (57 appearances for England)

8.      Australia, Joe Schmidt (School Teacher)

9.      Fiji, Michael Byrne (Aussie Rules Player)

10.  Italy, Gonzalo Quesada (38 appearances for Argentina).


It would appear as though we have entered an era where successful international coaches, largely, have played rugby at international level in the professional era. Or are ex school teachers. Much like Jake White and Graham Henry! Or a policeman.

 

Back to OJohn’s List. That leaves us with:


·       Less Kiss, (I like the look of)

·       Stephen Larkham, (I like the look of)

·       Jim McKay, (Very little to write home about)

·       David Nucifora, (Too old)

·       Scott Wisenthal, (I literally can’t find anything on him on the Google).

·       Ben Mowen, (Too young, no coaching experience)

·       Rod Kafer, (No coaching experience)

·       Mick Byrne, (He’s coaching the Fijians, Aussie rules!)

·       John Manetti, (Can’t find him on the google)

·       Jason Gilmore, (Seems to be working through the ranks, coaching Wallabies A)

·       Dan McKellar, (Not much to write home about, but could be an option).


Applying some logic, I would say the following are viable options based on age, experience in coaching AND the fact that they have played rugby for Australia in the professional era:

·       Less Kiss, (I like the look of)

·       Stephen Larkham, (I like the look of)

·       Jason Gilmore, (Seems to be working through the ranks, coaching Wallabies A)


After having done all this research, I think it’s fair to say that none of these three have the same pedigree as Joe Schmidt, the teacher. Who took a sh1tty Ireland team to no.1. Won a few 6 Nations and helped get the All Blacks to a world cup final in 2023.


Joe’s the best option for now. But if Kiss, Larkham and Gilmore are the business for the future for Australia get them in now as assistants to Joe and stop moaning!!


And, for the record, NONE of the above are good enough to coach the All Blacks. The All Blacks have the guy that hasn’t won a single Super title. He’s won 6.


Errors and Ommissions Excepted. Mispelling of names is OJohn's fault.

12 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search