Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Mo'unga vs Sexton: 'A true honour and privilege to match up against him'

Richie Mo'unga. (Photo by Andrew Cornaga/Photosport)

There will be no shortage of blockbuster matchups when the All Blacks and Ireland take to the Stade de France field in what promises to be an all-time classic Rugby World Cup quarter-final this weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier in the week, Ireland named a matchday 23 oozing with the kind of power and class that have propelled the nation to world rugby’s No 1 ranked team, surviving multiple injury scares from round five’s Scotland Test.

The All Blacks have replied in kind, naming a team packed with explosive talent, with just one departure from the expected starting XV as Leicester Fainga’anuku steps in for the stood-down Mark Telea.

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live – RWC Semi Finals

Join Big Jim & special guests for the special live shows before and after each Semi Final live on Rugbypass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live – RWC Semi Finals

Join Big Jim & special guests for the special live shows before and after each Semi Final live on Rugbypass TV

Watch Free

Across the park, the matchups are mouth-watering, perhaps none more so than at first five-eighth.

Driving their respective teams around the park under the bright lights of Paris will be two of the rugby world’s master tacticians; Richie Mo’unga and Johnny Sexton.

Both players have a wealth of winning experience for club and country, but neither has touched the field in a Rugby World Cup final.

Fronting media after the All Blacks’ team naming, Mo’unga shared his admiration for his opposite.

“Johnny is all class, he’s a true director of his team,” he said. “Everything goes through Johnny.

“The way he’s able to play and be so consistent at the top level, he’s really transcended what it’s like to play as a first-five, fly-half.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Yeah, it’s just a true honour and privilege to match up against him. It’s really cool. For someone from the other side of the world, it’s really exciting.”

Team Form

Last 5 Games

4
Wins
4
3
Streak
1
16
Tries Scored
20
32
Points Difference
74
4/5
First Try
3/5
4/5
First Points
0/5
4/5
Race To 10 Points
4/5

Both teams have been ruthless in breaking down their opponent’s defence so far in the tournament, comfortably claiming the most points in their respective pools.

The knockout stages promise a very different challenge though, and Ireland’s defence in particular has proven a tough nut to crack. Andy Farrell’s men haven’t conceded more than 17 points all year and have only twice conceded more than 20 points during their current 17-game win streak.

ADVERTISEMENT

The match that preceded that win streak though was a 42-19 win to the All Blacks in the first Test of the historic Steinlager Series, which Ireland would go on to win.

Mo’unga was not employed as the preferred first five-eighth in that series, so will lead a refreshed attack against the Irish wall.

“Yeah, that’s a huge task. It starts up front, ball carrying and momentum, winning the speed of the ruck, making that ball as quick as we can.

“We’ve got to play eyes-up footy but do the basics really well to challenge these guys. If we can do that, we can get inroads and hopefully get awarded some penalties around the ruck.”

Related

That new attack is orchestrated by former Ireland coach Joe Schmidt. The coach joined Ian Foster’s staff after the Steinlager Series loss and has implemented new tactics to break down aggressive defensive lines, like that of the Irish.

Despite Schmidt’s relatively recent involvement in the Irish camp, the Irish players have insisted there are no tactical insights the coach could bring to the New Zealand scouting report, claiming a completely overhauled system under new coach Andy Farrell.

The All Blacks camp has been queried on the influence Schmidt has had in preparations for the do-or-die Test, but has consistently answered by pointing out the coach’s influence since joining the team in general.

“It’s been really great to have him in. He really is just a true passionate man of the game of rugby.

“You know, you get caught in the hallways talking code with him and you could be there a fair while. You’ve got to just turn your head the other way sometimes, try and avoid that,” Mo’unga joked.

“Nah, he’s awesome, the different perspective of footy he has. I would say that perspective is real basic, and the things that make a team tick really well.

“There’s been a few times too, you know, you’ve seen an angry Joe Schmidt as well, which has been pretty cool.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
B
Ben 435 days ago

When AB’s beat SA this year Mt Smart they employed a short kicking game to break SA defense, inside center and fly half both kicking early on. Expect that win was experiment to beat rush defense. Richie and BB ideal for game plan against Ireland. Cover defense by Ireland for sweeping behind backlin Johnny and Gibson both will be taken out of play with tactic.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 37 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search