Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Mouthguards that record collisions ready for a Test match trial

By PA
(Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

England and New Zealand will wear special mouthguards which measure the impact of collisions in their upcoming women’s Test matches, World Rugby has announced. The devices, which gather data around every impact when players collide with each other or with the ground, will be worn by the teams in the games on October 31 and November 7 and in training sessions around those matches. The devices even record impacts not directly involving the head.

ADVERTISEMENT

The study sits alongside community work using the same devices in Otago, New Zealand, to provide a detailed picture of head impacts at all levels of the women’s game. In the men’s game, the devices are being trialled at Leinster, Clermont Auvergne and Benetton Treviso, meaning more than 1,000 players will participate in the study overall. Gallagher Premiership champions Harlequins used a different product in their title run-in last season and were thrilled with the findings.

England captain Sarah Hunter said: “It’s great that ourselves and New Zealand are able to work with World Rugby on this important research ahead of our upcoming back-to-back autumn international matches. Making rugby safer for every player at all levels of the game is hugely important and we are pleased to contribute.”

Video Spacer

Andy Powell is the funniest man in rugby

Video Spacer

Andy Powell is the funniest man in rugby

The devices were developed by Prevent Biometrics. Dr Simon Kemp, the Rugby Football Union’s medical services director said: “We are delighted to collaborate with World Rugby on this research project. The findings will be an important addition to rugby’s developing understanding of head impact exposure.”

World Rugby is also conducting a separate study using eye-tracking technology which it hopes will support the head injury assessment and graduated return to play process.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

j
johnz 45 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

This is such a devisive issue in New Zealand, Razor is a brave man; people tend to take polarising stands of all or nothing positions. I suspect there's a balanced compromise, if people are able to discuss the pros and cons rationally. There are good arguments from both sides of the debate, and as with all controversial issues, the solution is rarely black and white.


But let's take the Barrett vs Mounga debate, a topic that never grows old. I think some context is in order when Barrett is proclaimed as "loyal", while it seems to be insinuated that Mo'unga is not.


A little history is needed regarding Barrett's loyalty - so far he has had 2 (or 3?) sabbaticals, which are really just overseas-based All Black's by stealth. Since he left the Hurricanes, he's 'been a bit part player at the Blues at best, while his performances at SR level have left plenty to be desired. As of last season, he quit NZ Rugby for Japan. It's concievable the rise of Mounga played a part in that decision, while Mounga's subsequent departure appears to have played a part in BB's return.


Prior to returning, BB tried to negotiate a contract to be the 1st official overseas-based player. So loyal? Maybe. Opportunistic? Probably. It's clear Barrett's first instinct was not commitment and sacrifice to the coalface of Super Rugby.


I don't recall a Mo'unga being awarded a sabatical at all, and he has been a far bigger contributor than Barrett has at Super Rugby level for quite some time. Perhaps NZR just didn't value Mo'unga enough to bend the rules the same as they have for Barrett?


NZR have always massaged the rules for Barrett and expended a lot of financial resources to keep his services. At the same time, our player depth get's stripped away, as premier SR players, such as Plumber and Burke, take off for better pay cheques elsewhere.


Personally, I wouldn't mind if the big wage bill for a few aging stars like Barrett are shared with Japan. I'm not convinced Barrett's adding much at SR level and the money could be used elsewhere. Just as long as there's no guarantee of a jersey for such marque players, I don't see a big issue.

33 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Seven Springboks make World Rugby men’s 15s dream team of the year Seven Springboks make World Rugby men’s 15s dream team of the year
Search