Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Multiple cancellations incoming as French government impose travel bans

By PA
Heinken Champions Cup generic

New travel restrictions brought in by the French government are threatening to play havoc with the weekend’s Heineken Champions Cup fixtures.

ADVERTISEMENT

It comes as Leinster’s trip to Montpellier on Friday night was the first match to fall to Covid-19 after the Irish province produced a number of new cases. The cancellation results in a 28-0 victory being awarded to Montpellier.

Leinster have released a statement expressing their “disappointment” with the decision to award all five match points to the Top 14 side having been given the green light to travel by Public Health Ireland.

Video Spacer

Ali Price, Quarantine Hotels & Champions Cup Rugby | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 14

Video Spacer

Ali Price, Quarantine Hotels & Champions Cup Rugby | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 14

Tournament organisers EPCR have confirmed that they are in discussions with the French authorities over what the new measures mean for the round two games still due to take place this weekend.

Tourism and work are no longer sufficient reasons for travel regardless of vaccination status with Paris declaring only essential travel is permitted.

Also adding to the problems for visiting teams is that all arrivals from the UK must provide a negative test within the previous 24 hours as well as quarantine in France for seven days, although a fresh negative test will reduce that to 48 hours.

While the restrictions cast a cloud over an additional seven games this weekend, the fact that they come into effect from Saturday evening places the following day’s action in major doubt.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two Gallagher Premiership clubs are involved with Wasps travelling to Toulouse and Bristol visiting Stade Francais.

Bears director of rugby Pat Lam admits the game is shrouded in uncertainty.

“I wouldn’t say I’m confident that it will go ahead but we are confident we can go over there and prepare well,” Lam said.

“There are talks going on, we are expecting to fly out on Saturday and are just waiting to see what is happening.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The French government are involved now which is the stumbling block at the moment. It’s out of our control.

“Getting over there is one thing, but you have to do all the PCR tests with all the timings.

“You might end up flying over there, not getting your results until you arrive and then players are ruled out and you are coming all the way back again.

“Now it’s not only about being able to get in, but the testing process and a 48-hour quarantine, which obviously can’t happen.

“These are the things our decision-makers are going through and hopefully they’ll let us know asap.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search