Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'My first taste of French rugby, the first scrum fell and it was a 15-on-15 brawl. It was sink or swim - I had to punch back'

(Photo by Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images)

It was quite the wait for ex-Scotland back row Josh Strauss to finally get his first Oyonnax start on Friday night ages after signing a six-month deal with the French Pro D2 club in early December as a medical joker for the injured Luke Hamilton.

ADVERTISEMENT

He missed out on the pre-Christmas action after contracting Covid the week following his arrival back in Europe. Then when the league resumed at the beginning of January, he was red-carded for a tackle after coming off the bench at Grenoble.

Add in the ensuing ban and it meant it wasn’t until Friday night’s draw at Mont-de-Marsan that he was at last on the pitch starting a match and remembering what it was like to a proper rugby player for the first time in eleven months.

Video Spacer

Jonny Wilkinson and Gregor Townsend appeared on RugbyPass All Access in the lead-up to Saturday’s Calcutta Cup match

Video Spacer

Jonny Wilkinson and Gregor Townsend appeared on RugbyPass All Access in the lead-up to Saturday’s Calcutta Cup match

It was March 14 last year in Brisbane when Strauss last ran out to play from the first whistle, the Bulls taking on the Reds before Super Rugby was shelved due to the pandemic. What followed was an incredibly difficult adjustment.

A sharp exit from the Bulls, an offer at the Stormers that fell through and then a lifeline from the French second tier after what had seemed an endless purgatory where the 34-year-old South African feared the end was nigh for a reputable career where he won 24 caps for Scotland on the back of a residency qualification.

The irony of it all is that Strauss has wound up at promotion-chasing Oyonnax, about 70kms up the Eastern France road from Lons-le-Saunier, the spa town where he spent his first year in the paid rugby ranks many moons ago. It was a baptism of fire for the then 20-year-old, a lesson in growing up very fast in order to survive the weekly anarchy of naughty wild west behaviour.

“I’ll never forget my first game, we played Massy in Paris,” Strauss told RugbyPass over the phone from France while seeing the final days out of his recent ban. “I was scrumming at No8 in my first taste of foreign rugby, the first taste of senior rugby, and the first scrum, the front row fell and it was a 15-on-15 brawl straightaway.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I stood there shocked and the No8 on the other team, a player from Ivory Coast, ran across the scrum trying to fight me. I had never seen this guy but he was marking the eight and he just came at me and started throwing fists. It was sink or swim. I had to punch back.”

Why Strauss was in France in the first place in 2007 was a reflection of the cut-throat business that is trying to make it as a pro in South Africa. If you don’t get an early look-in the door is effectively closed and even his French arrival wasn’t without its troubles, his plan taking a hit just before he was due to travel.

“In South Africa, it’s almost if you don’t make it at school it’s very tough to make it after. If you don’t make a name for yourself at schoolboy level playing for Western Province or the Bulls or the Lions U18s, U20s etc and South Africa U20s it’s very tough to make it.

“I never reached any of those milestones so the year after school I went to play in a small union which wasn’t too far from my house, about a 45-minute drive. I played for their U19s, it was still Currie Cup, still provincial rugby but we were the whipping boys of the competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was then on my way to Biarritz to try my luck there and literally the week of my flight they informed us that the French federation had brought in bans on having too many foreigners. That’s when the JIFF thing started happening.

“Biarritz already had too many foreigners on their books so that fell through the week of my flight and I managed to get the gig at Lons. It was still a decent level given that Federale 1 is semi-professional. It was my first taste of proper senior rugby. I had played amateur senior rugby in South Africa but it’s not on the same level.

Strauss Lions
Josh Strauss gets stuck in during his Lions days (Photo by Duif du Toit/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

“I came over to Lons and I didn’t know what to expect. I thought I was still playing juniors. I still remember asking the manager where is the U20s and he was like ‘no U20s, we play first-team’. I went, ‘Oh s***, here we go’. It was a tough league, especially back then there was a lot of fighting, really physical. A lot of old boys who had played Top 14 came down.

“We had a very good year, made the playoffs to go to Pro D2 but unfortunately we played Colomiers in the playoff game. They had just been relegated from Top 14 due to financial reasons and they absolutely spanked us. That is where that season ended.

“I did get an offer to stay but at that age being alone away from home for a year I wasn’t too keen on staying. If I had an offer from a Pro D2 team I would have considered it but I wasn’t keen on staying in Federale 1 for another year. 

“Not that I didn’t enjoy the club. I have to give you a bit of background: the president left the club and told us not to re-sign because he said the people taking over won’t run the club as professionally. That is when I actually made my decision not to stay. In hindsight, it was a great decision because they got financially relegated the next year by four divisions due to bankruptcy, so it worked out well.”

It sure did for Strauss. His maturation in France became the launchpad for multiple ensuing thrills, good form at Boland delivering him into the Super Rugby Lions. Five years at Glasgow was then followed by two more at Sale before he decided to head home via a pitstop at Stade Francais to fill the void of missing out on 2019 World Cup selection.

The Bulls had piqued his interest. However, rather than Pretoria being a match made in heaven for the twilight of his career, it was very nearly the death knell. “I signed a two-year deal with the Bulls, started all seven games before Covid hit and we were talking about extending. I loved the coach (Pote Human) and loved the set-up.

“Then Covid happened and they fired that coach, fired the CEO who signed me and implemented a 46 per cent pay cut on everyone. I contacted South Africa rugby and said I have already come back on a massive pay cut. I was offered a deal to stay in Paris with Stade but I wanted to go back to my family.

“I had it all planned out but Covid happened and all this planning fell through. The option was to stay in Pretoria away from my family in Cape Town for half the salary and not see them anymore. With the old coach, the agreement was that every week I could go home for two days to see my family.

“When the new coach (Jake White) came in he said, ‘No, that won’t be the case anymore’. He wanted me there full-time and I just said I’d rather not do that, thank you, so we parted ways. To be fair at that stage I didn’t think Covid would have that much effect on the global market. I just assumed I would walk into another contract and that unfortunately wasn’t the case.

“I have been chatting to mates, especially older mates, and Covid has had a massive effect on the older market. Hindsight is a beautiful thing. I didn’t know what would happen. I just made decisions based on my experiences and now we are where we are.”

It didn’t help that a suggested deal with the Stormers fell through, a mishap that further convinced Strauss of the need for SA Rugby to allow its franchises be 100 per cent privately owned businesses so they can properly thrive.

“It needs private ownership,” he said. “In South Africa, the rugby law states that no one can own more than SA Rugby. So even though I might be the owner of the Stormers I’m only allowed to own 49 per cent. That is how SA Rugby keeps control of the union.

“It should be 100 per cent privately owned because there are people in the country that have enough money to make South Africa, especially with the talent there, a global powerhouse. But because SA Rugby rules the roost there they undermine everything and that is why salaries are smaller.

“If it was privately owned they could pay players what they wanted within the cap. South African players are very underpaid compared to the rest of the world. They get paid peanuts compared to Europe.

“The thing with the Stormers, the coach (John Dobson) wanted to sign me because they were in talks with a private company to buy the Stormers and be the owners. If that went through I would have signed a two-year deal. That never went through and then there wasn’t money to sign me.

“That is why I said it should be privately owned. The Stormers are going down the road of bankruptcy at the moment if things don’t change and it shouldn’t be the case. Cape Town is a lovely place and you should be able to run a great rugby union.”

The fallout left Strauss hanging by the phone and contemplating retirement. “It’s definitely stressful. All of a sudden your whole plan changed. I had a two/three-year plan for my transition from playing to life after rugby and all of a sudden that is cut short.

“Your agent is telling you don’t worry, we’ll find something. A month goes by, then two months, three months and you’re like, ‘S***, what’s happening here?’ Then you start realising the market isn’t what it used to be. I’d plenty of offers but some were laughable compared to what I used to earn.

“I spoke to my wife, decided on a number I would be able to play rugby for or else I would go working at something else. I did stress but there was also an element of if I work hard and back myself, I will find something and prove myself. It’s almost like a bit of psychology, you calm yourself down by saying that to yourself.

“There were times when I was phoning my agent and saying, ‘I think I should retire, I should just start doing something else’. But the market, I have spoken to a few players in the same boat as me, including one at Oyonnax who is an ex-French international (Benjamin Fall). He sat it out waiting six months for a contract and he is a very good player, but it’s just the market.”

The state of flux is why Strauss doesn’t know yet what the future holds after June. A deal in France would see his family join him from Cape Town, but until then he’s in limbo, contemplating taking a business degree and teasing out other plans for a post-playing career that could involve coaching, preferably at schools/university level, as he has taken his badges.

“People close to me, they see what I do and still they think that rugby is just this glamorous job where you have these accolades and you’re travelling. But there is a lot of other sides to rugby people don’t see and one of them is the time with the family.

“At the moment I’m on my own in Oyonnax hoping to get re-signed long-term and then my family will come over, but there is a lot of sacrifices involved. I went home for Christmas and was going to be there for eleven days and I had to cut it short because they started closing the borders because of this new strain.

“I don’t know when I will see them again. Hopefully, before my six-month contract is up. Life is crazy at the moment, but you have just got to roll with it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
L
Leslie 1086 days ago

Why I love and hate rugby .Love . It’s a beautiful game that can only be successfully played with great skill and uncompromising aggression . Hate . As a violent game you must play within the laws and I hated that a huge amount of good rugby players where actually just thugs . Getting punched by your opposite number when the ball was 50m away was par for the course in French and SA rugby in the mid 70s when I played . Hated that . Why train so hard , build up skill only to ruin your life with a broken jaw caused by some thug . Why were they allowed to play ? I advised all my sons never to play rugby because of the thuggery . Fortunately today things have greatly changed but in the early 80s rugby had ( especially in France ) an extremely dirty side which caused life long injuries .

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 14 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

46 Go to comments
f
fl 29 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

46 Go to comments
J
JW 33 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?


I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).

Because I don't think that having the possibility of a team finishing outside the quarter finals to qualify automatically will be a good idea. I'd rather have a team finishing 5th in their domestic league.

fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.


The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.

46 Go to comments
J
JW 51 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

46 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

46 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Former All Blacks coach offers progress report on Joseph Manu's preseason Former All Blacks coach confident in Joseph Manu's progress
Search