Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'My mindset hasn't changed': Rennie wants home-based Wallabies

(Photo by David Ramos - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

The selection of European-based players Will Skelton, Tolu Latu and Rory Arnold in the Wallabies squad for the November end-of-year tour has added further confusion to the state of the Giteau-law eligibility for overseas based Australians.

ADVERTISEMENT

Originally requiring 60-Test caps, exemptions were made this year to allow for two players who didn’t met the threshold based overseas to be picked. With Covid restrictions further complicating matters with certain Wallaby players stuck in different states, more relaxations were made.

Although Quade Cooper satisfied the criteria under the Giteau law, the exemptions allowed for Samu Kerevi and Sean McMahon to return during the Rugby Championship and now a handful of European stars will join them.

Video Spacer

Michael Cheika on life as the Wallabies coach

Video Spacer

Michael Cheika on life as the Wallabies coach

Head coach Dave Rennie explained that his thinking around the rule hasn’t changed and he still wants to pick Australian-based players, despite leaving young Reds players Harry Wilson, Fraser McReight and Brumbies flyhalf Noah Lolesio at home for the European tour.

He hoped that the tase of top flight international rugby again would lure back some of the country’s top players back to Australia to bolster the Super Rugby teams.

“For want of a better word, the Giteau Law, there’s nothing based in concrete at this stage,” Rennie explained to reporters on Friday.

“Preference is still to pick from here. My mindset hasn’t changed around that. I think it’s important we’re promoting from within.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think some of these guys coming in and getting a taste of the environment and the culture, hopefully that encourages them to come back and play here.

“Some of them have got existing contracts that will take them through to all of next year and some of them right through to the World Cup, but I guess we’re trying to bring as many home as we can to add to the quality of our Super teams to help from an experience point-of-view to help with all the young men coming through which will eventually benefit us.”

Rennie clarified just what had happened to the Giteau Law due to Covid, and that the relaxations offered will be reviewed following the end of the November tour which will see the Wallabies play Japan in Oita before heading to Europe to play Scotland, England and Wales.

“There’s been exceptions based on Covid,” he said.

“Historically, there’s been the 60-plus [tests] rule. We talked about being able to bring a couple of guys in, and that was our plan to go with that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Once Covid restrictions had come in, we couldn’t get any players out of New South Wales, couldn’t get them out of Victoria.

“We had a couple of other players at home, and so we got an exemption to utilise some of those guys who were actually here in between seasons, so that’s not necessarily the plan going forward.

“They’ll be discussions we have post-Spring Tour.”

One of the overseas based stars who could join the squad is Kurtley Beale, who with 92-Test caps already satisfies the original Giteau law threshold. Rennie was coy about bringing back Beale, saying that they are ‘constantly talking’ with a host of players that are based offshore.

In terms of players that can cover fullback, Rennie floated Luke Morahan as an option as well as plenty of guys in the squad already who can cover the role.

“We’re constantly talking about players who are overseas and Luke Morahan is another guy who comes in,” he said.

“We’ve certainly spoken about everyone who’s over there. Obviously we’re still trying to promote from within. We think Hodgey can do a job for us there. We’ve got Andrew Kellaway, who’s played a little bit of 15, certainly trained a lot at 15 for us. W

“We’d like to see Jordy [Jordan Petaia] play a lot of 15 at Super level before considering him at test level. The plan is, from a Barbarians point-of-view, Jordy will stay and play 15 in that game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search