Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'My players are not safe': Ex-All Black at the centre of high shot controversy

(Source/URC TV)

Former All Black Vaea Fifita was at the centre of controversy in the Scarlets 32-15 loss to the Lions in South Africa after copping a high shot across the face that left him with a bloody nose.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Scarlets lock was forced from the field in the 45th minute after taking a swinging arm from Lions loose forward Darrien Landsberg, which wasn’t deemed worthy of a card by referee Ben Blain.

Fifita had braced himself for contact for a defender going low, cocking his forearm and raising his knee to bump off the first defender, but his low angle put him in the firing line of a swinging arm from Landsberg.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The former All Black, who now represents Tonga, took most of the contact from the arm across the face and nose. Play was stopped immediately as Fifita didn’t move on the ground and medics rushed to his attention.

But Welsh test international and British & Irish Lion Jonathan Davies, a veteran of 99 Tests, was left in frustration after seeing Fifita fouled and pleaded with the referee to review the tackle.

Protests over contact to the head fell on deaf ears as Blain responded to Davies: “There can be contact to the head and not be foul play, not all contact to the head is foul play.”

Lions players also protested the incident: “Is he allowed to lead with his knee? When he carries, he can’t lead with his knee.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier in the game the Scarlets’ flyhalf Sam Costelow had been yellow carded for a tackle around the neck area of Lions scrumhalf Sanele Nohamba.

The two incidents left Davies incensed enough to approach the Scottish ref at full-time to discuss the rulings which he called ‘not fair’ and questioned Blain over player safety.

“A guy gets his nose across his face,” Davies is heard saying.

“My players are not safe when there are shots like that.

“Our 10 got sin-binned — right, a little hit on the side of the neck like that.

“Our guy’s nose across his face. The safety of my players is at risk.

“It’s not fair. It’s not fair.”

The Lions never looked like losing after a double from man-of-the-match No 8 Emmanuel Tshituka helped the home side to a healthy bonus point win.

ADVERTISEMENT

Right winger Rabz Maxwane and Jaco Kriel also crossed over, with Maxwane coming up with the try of the match after turning Davies inside-out and outpacing Fifita on a winding run in the first half.

Scarlets picked up a late consolation try through Tongan international Sam Lousi, who crossed over from a pick and go close to the line, but it failed to prevent a fourth-straight URC loss for the Welsh outfit.

The Lions moved up into fifth on the United Rugby Championship ladder with the 32-15 win.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search