Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Need for simplicity’: World Rugby to tweak WXV post-Women’s RWC 2025

VANCOUVER, CANADA - SEPTEMBER 24: (Back row L-R) Edel McMahon of Ireland, Zoe Aldcroft of England, Tyson Beukeboom of Canada, Ruahei Demant of New Zealand, (Front Row L-R) Kate Zackary of the United States, and Marine Ménager of France pose for a photo during the Captains Photocall ahead of the WXV1 Tournament on September 24, 2024 in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo by Ethan Cairns - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

On the eve of WXV 2024 World Rugby has said the competition “will evolve and change” before it returns in 2026, with an announcement on its future direction expected as early as the new year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The second edition of WXV, World Rugby’s 18-team annual global women’s competition, will get underway this weekend in Canada, South Africa and the United Arab Emirates with the final six places at Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 to be decided.

Launched in 2023 with the aim of raising standards and improving competitiveness on the road to that expanded 16-team World Cup in England, the inaugural edition was staged across New Zealand, Cape Town and Dubai last October and November.

Video Spacer

Watch the best tries of WXV 2023

Video Spacer

Watch the best tries of WXV 2023

The Red Roses claimed the first WXV 1 title, while Scotland won the second level and Ireland emerged victorious in the third.

Scotland and Ireland have used those campaigns as a springboard to further success, the former rising to fifth in the World Rugby Women’s Rankings while the latter qualified for WXV 1, which gets underway in Vancouver on Sunday.

However, there have been teething problems too and World Rugby Chief of Women’s Rugby, Sally Horrox reiterated on Tuesday that the format has been under review, with participating unions part of that process.

“WXV came into shape as a two-year commitment to take us on a sprint to the Rugby World Cup in 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So, [it created] foundational building blocks and I think it was absolutely essential that World Rugby took the initiative there to build that increased competitiveness, to build that increased opportunity on and off the pitch for those teams to be together,” Horrox said.

Related

“Our responsibility is to build that global profile in the game, not just with the top-ranked countries. So, it was essential and those foundational building blocks are now clearly in place.

“But we absolutely understand and are working with all 18 unions. They all were in town; we were with them last week. We’ve had a working group all the way through the last 12 months.

“So, we understand and agree that there is a greater need for certainty. There is a greater need for simplicity, there is a greater need for more home content as we all seek to grow the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So, we are confident with our unions that the model will evolve and change. We’ve got some really clear options on the table that have got strong support from the unions, but we’re going to debrief after WXV, this edition, and then we’ll go into the end of this year and then we’ll make some announcements early next year.

“Because what’s critical is that everybody has a clear route from ’25 through the new evolution of WXV and ’26 to ’28 with a clear pathway to qualification for the Rugby World Cup in ’29.”

Related

Red Roses head coach John Mitchell last week voiced concerns over the expected crowd numbers for WXV 1, intimating that the rest of the world has a responsibility to grow attendances to the levels seen in England and France.

Horrox is confident Canada, whose record attendance for a women’s match is the 10,092 set during the 2023 Pacific Four Series, will rise to the challenge of hosting the top level.

“I was there last week at Twickenham, and it was incredible, and we know that the Canadian public, they are learning to love rugby,” Horrox said.

“I was out there for Pac Four when they pulled a 10,000-plus crowd and it was amazing. So, we know they can do it.

“We also know there’s education and they have to work really, really hard in a sports market where rugby isn’t their first sport. We know they’re doing that.

“They’re a great partner, they put their hands up to host this event, they are putting women at the heart of their growth plan for the sport in Canada. So, we’re delighted that we’re working with them.

“But building audience, building fans takes time and it’s still a relatively young sport in Canada. But we’re going there because we’re confident, because they’ve done a good job for us last time.”

Related

Horrox added that while getting fans into stadiums is “really important” to World Rugby, extending the game’s global reach through broadcasters and streaming platforms, such as RugbyPass TV, is “critical”.

The success of the women’s sevens tournament at the Paris 2024 Olympics, which was played in front of sold-out signs at Stade de France, has perhaps done more than any other single event to increase that reach.

Ilona Maher, the breakthrough star of those Games, has made clear her desire to represent USA at next year’s World Cup and Horrox suggested the new global calendar will allow for greater movement between the two formats.

“We’re working with the chief executives of the unions on the men’s and the women’s game, on the future shape of the sevens and 15s game specifically for women,” she said.

“Not everyone will share the same perspective but if I can generalise a little bit, that twin track approach [is an opportunity] provided we can deconflict the calendar sufficiently, which is a critical point specifically in the women’s game.

“Because we see talent transfer between the sevens and 15s game in several markets. Speaking with many of the coaches and the chief executives [they see it] as a real opportunity.

“So, there is player interest in talent transfer. The coaches are educating us and our performance teams in their ability to basically run a core training programme and then allow players to shift provided the calendar allows them to support them in that way.

“So, we see that as an opportunity, but we’ll be player-led and we’ll be union-led in that approach.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 20 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025? What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025?
Search