Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Needed to change': The reason why England named 3 vice-captains

(Photo by David Rogers/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Eddie Jones has explained the reasons why he has chosen Ellis Genge, Courtney Lawes and Tom Curry as England vice-captains to back up skipper Owen Farrell in this Saturday’s Autumn Nations Cup opener versus Tonga at Twickenham. Vice-captaincy was something that flew under the radar in recent times, the team naming just listing Farrell as skipper with no reference made to who was the deputy leader.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Thursday’s team announcement stated how Genge, Lawes and Curry would all be vice-captains for the upcoming three-game series which also features matches versus Australia and South Africa. 

The England team chosen by Jones is an XV showing nine changes from the loss last March versus Ireland in round five of the Six Nations and having added multiple rookie players to the squad since then, Jones felt a greater need to have all bases covered when it came to the leadership of the team with the countdown now on towards the 2023 World Cup in 22 months’ time.  

Video Spacer

Jack Nowell lifts the lid on ‘New England’

Video Spacer

Jack Nowell lifts the lid on ‘New England’

“The leadership team should always reflect the team,” suggested Jones. “The leadership team’s job is to influence and get the best out of the team and we feel that the greater the diversity in the leadership team, particularly with the number of young guys in the team, is suited by having those three guys as vice-captains. 

“There is a nice spread, Courtney has been a Test player for a number of years. Tom Curry is a young guy coming through as is Genge, so we feel like we cover the interests of the team better than we did with the previous leadership team. That is not to say they didn’t do a good job but we needed to change.

“They all bring to the party something a little bit different. Tom Curry is a very tough, aggressive player. Ellis Genge is the same, but he has also got a great set of human qualities. He had quite a tough upbringing, he understands what young players go through. 

“Just for this game, for instance, the challenge for young players playing this Test match is enormous. A lot of them haven’t played in front of a full house and now they are going to play in front of 82,000 people against a Tongan side that hits harder than any side in the world. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Genge’s ability to be able to relate to those players and Courtney has years of experience. He has probably seen the best and the worst of English rugby and he can share those experiences with the players, and Owen is the best man for the job as captain.

“We have got a couple of people internally, consultants to the team (helping the leadership group). We are also using Deloitte for some personal leadership programme work which has just started so it is just in its infancy at the moment, but we are certainly looking to give them the necessary support to be the best leadership team in the world.”

Saturday will be skipper Farrell’s 100th Test match appearance. He currently has 93 England caps and another six for the Lions, and Jones paid tribute to the newly minted Test centurion. “He has been a fine ambassador for English rugby.

“He is a hard-working player, he has copped a lot of criticism throughout his career and he has had to battle hard to be a Test player and he continues to battle hard, continues to battle to be his best and we haven’t seen the best of him yet and that is the exciting thing. He is still a young man, 29 years of age. He has played nearly 100 Tests and there is still to come for him.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search