Neither player concussed - findings of French HIA review published

The Six Nations have issued the findings of their review of France’s HIA protocol during their opening game of the tournament against Ireland in Paris on February 3rd.

The statement effectively clears all involved in the two incidents of any impropriety or any attempt by the French to gain a competitive edge.

It does however confirm that neither player was concussed in either incident. The two incidents caused an uproar among fans, pundits and former players on social media, many of whom branded it as an attempt by the French to gain an advantage.

You can read the text of the statements from the Six Nations below:

“In accordance with the (World Rugby-approved) Head Injury Assessment (HIA) Protocol that applies to the 2018 NatWest Six Nations Championships, following the senior men’s match between France and Ireland on Saturday, 3 February 2018, Six Nations Rugby referred two HIA-related incidents to its HIA Review Panel (this was the second stage of World Rugby’s HIA review process and followed an initial review by the HIA Review Processor appointed by Six Nations, Alligin (UK) Limited). The two incidents concerned, respectively, the replacement of French number 10, Matthieu Jalibert, in the 30th minute of the match, and the replacement of French number 21, Antoine Dupont, in the 76th minute of the match.

“The HIA Review Panel reviewed video footage of the two incidents, the forms completed by those carrying out the HIA in each case, the written conclusions of the HIA Review Processor and written statements from over a dozen individuals connected with one or both of the incidents.

“The HIA Review Panel has now concluded its review and reported its conclusions to Six Nations Rugby.

“In respect of the incident involving Mr Jalibert, the HIA Review Panel concluded (in summary) that: the player had not suffered a concussion during the relevant incident and therefore could (if not for an injury that he had sustained to his knee) have returned to the pitch after the HIA; the decision to call for an HIA was not made by anyone who was formally connected with the French team, rather it was made by the match day doctor, supported by the video doctor, and was based on the player having been on the ground (motionless) for a period of time; and while there was some debate about whether or not it had been appropriate for the match day doctor to call for an HIA in the circumstances, there was no evidence of anyone within the FFR seeking to gain a competitive advantage.

“In respect of the incident involving Mr Dupont, the HIA Review Panel concluded (in summary) that: the player had not suffered a concussion during the relevant incident and therefore could (if not for an injury that he had sustained to his knee and the match having come to an end) have returned to the pitch after the HIA; the decision to call for an HIA was not made by anyone who was formally connected with the French team, rather it was made by the match day doctor, supported by the video doctor, and was based on the match officials’ earlier indication that an HIA was required; although the match day doctor and the video doctor should not have simply accepted the match officials’ indication that an HIA was required, it was understandable that they called for an HIA in those circumstances; and again, there was no evidence of anyone within the FFR seeking to gain a competitive advantage.

“The HIA Review Panel also recommended certain issues be clarified in the future to try to avoid similar cases arising, and Six Nations Rugby will be liaising with World Rugby and the relevant parties on those issues. Six Nations Rugby will not be taking any disciplinary action against any of the parties involved in the two incidents.”