Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

A new ball has had a remarkable statistical effect on the Pro14

The PRO14 has been suspended as a result of Covid-19.

Try-scoring and goal-kicking success rates are up right across the Guinness PRO14 since the introduction of a new ball – it has been revealed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since Gilbert’s arrival as official match ball partner to the Guinness PRO14 in August, their MATCH-XV ball has been used in all 70 Championship games to date and already its impact is clear to see.

When compared to last season’s statistics after 10 rounds it’s obvious that players in the Guinness PRO14 have wasted no time in getting to grips with the new ball.

How much other factors have played into those statistics is unclear, but a strong argument can be made that the ball has played a fundamental role in the increasing accuracy of kicking.

The statistics bear out a significant change: The average tries scored per game has risen from 5.4 to 5.8; goalkicking success among the Top 10 kickers is up by 7.8%; goalkicking success among the Top 20 kickers is up by 7.65%; and three players (Finn Russell, Dan Jones, Jarrod Evans) have a success rate above 90% compared to none after Round 10 last season.

All of the Top 10 kickers are above 80% success rate while four players were below that mark after Round 10 last season

Top 10 Goal Kickers 2017/18

Finn Russell (Glasgow Warriors) 95.24% (20/21)
Dan Jones (Scarlets) 92.86% (13/14)
Jarrod Evans (Cardiff Blues) 91.67% (22/24)
Leigh Halfpenny (Scarlets) 86.96% (20/23)
Pete Horne (Glasgow Warriors) 85.71% (18/21)
Steve Shingler (Cardiff Blues) 85% (17/20)
Duncan Weir (Edinburgh) 85% (17/20)
Jason Tovey (Edinburgh) 83.33% (15/18)
Ernst Stapelberg (Toyota Cheetahs) 82.86% (29/35)
Sam Davies (Ospreys) 80% (12/15)

ADVERTISEMENT

Top 10 Goal Kickers 2016/17

Finn Russell (Glasgow Warriors) 85.71% (12/14)
Johnny Sexton (Leinster) 85.71% (12/14)
Sam Davies (Ospreys) 84.85% (28/33)
Isa Nacewa (Leinster) 84.62% (22/26)
Tyler Bleyendaal (Munster) 83.87% (26/31)
Tommaso Allan (Benetton Rugby) 82.35% (14/17)
Rhys Patchell (Scarlets) 78.05% (32/41)
Gareth Anscombe (Cardiff Blues) 76.19% (16/21)
Ian Keatley (Munster) 72.22% (13/18)
Jason Tovey (Edinburgh) 71.43% (10/14)

Goal-kicking statistics refer to those players ranked in the Top 10 and 20 who had attempted a minimum of 10 shots at goal by Round 10 in each of the seasons referenced.

Last year the Pro14 used a Rhino ball across the competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Wallabies have a serious problem The Wallabies have a serious problem
Search