Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New World Rugby rankings don't make for pretty reading for England

(Photo by Getty Images)

The new World Rugby rankings have been released and it’s not good news for England.

Eddie Jones’ stated goal for the England was to be the number one Test side by the time the 2019 World Cup came along, instead they’ve dropped to fourth, for the first time in two years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Things looked promising when England raced to an early 24-3 lead in Johannesburg against the Springboks, but they ended up losing 42-39 to slip to their fourth Test defeat in a row (the loss to the Barbarians is not counted).

Video Spacer

Australia are the team to leapfrog England, into third following their 18-9 win over Grand Slam champions Ireland, who remain in second despite the defeat in Brisbane.

In ending Ireland’s 12-match winning run the Wallabies earned 1.07 points and the difference between Joe Schmidt’s side and Australia is now down to one and a half points.

Video Spacer

And England will have to look over their shoulders as Wales are breathing down their necks too, a win of greater than 20-10 over Argentina in San Juan would have seen Warren Gatland’s side go ahead of England, but instead they trail by a mere six-hundredths of a point.

Despite South Africa’s win over England they stay seventh, behind Gregor Townsend’s Scotland, who beat Canada 48-10 in Edmonton.

Fiji have equalled their best ever World Rugby ranking, they’re up to ninth thanks to their narrow 24-22 win over Samoa in the World Rugby Pacific Nations Cup. Argentina’s loss to Wales see them slip to 10th.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand sit top of standings, they trailed France 11-8 at half-time in Auckland, but responded with 44 unanswered points to seal an emphatic victory.

World Cup hosts Japan remain in 11th thanks to their 34-17 win over Italy. Conor O’Shea’s side remain 14th behind Georgia and Tonga.

World Rugby Rankings:

1.(1) NEW ZEALAND 93.99
2.(2) IRELAND 88.05
3.(4) AUSTRALIA 86.56
4.(3) ENGLAND 85.19
5.(5) WALES 85.13
6.(6) SCOTLAND 83.83
7.(7) SOUTH AFRICA 83.81
8.(8) FRANCE 79.10
9.(10) FIJI 77.93
10.(9) ARGENTINA 77.54

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video

South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Lions Share | Episode 5

Play Video

Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

Play Video

The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

Play Video

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

Play Video

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

T
TL 34 minutes ago
'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

I agree, the comparison to Rassie in 2021 is unfair. Schmidt despite being highly emotional was scrupulous in not making it a personal grudge match, and in the circumstances I think he behaved in a decent way. What Rassie did was unhinged and extreme. Why fudge the two together? It’s much more common for coaches to do what Joe did, and it was unusual for him, he resisted efforts of journo’s to get him talking about the cards that weren’t in Test 1. He’s taken exception in this instance, if he was doing it all the time I’d dismiss it, but he’s got some cred so I take it a little more seriously when he speaks up.


Otherwise Mr Bishop/ Nick you have yet again proven your acumen as a selector and tactician this series, making calls before not after the event, like any good analyst would. Schmidt was cruelled by injuries this series, more than was apparent initially. In both games injuries to Bobby V and Skelton’s fitness hampered the WBs, and Gleeson in Test 1, and Noah before, and JAS leading in. Picking TT would have been a huge risk after SR form, but yes, seems like it would have been worth taking in hindsight and many were suggesting before. We just don’t have the depth for that not to make a big impact. But Joe seems to have put his chips on Williams as long termer and is investing in him, like he did players in Ireland, when Williams is yet to deliver in this series (although the lineout has been solid when he’s on). Perhaps his time will come. JAS defence is perhaps the biggest issue as Nick you’ve pointed out now on multiple occasions. I just get flummoxed myself thinking about it, as any solution creates another problem, perhaps he just needs time and it just had to be this way….At the very least we need an A/B test and see what the experiment uncovers.


As an Australian I stick to the paradoxical blend of unrealistic optimism and fatalism in reflecting on these decisions that has at once been the blessing and cruse of our culture historically.

21 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The forgotten art of the drop goal - and how it's making a comeback The forgotten art of the drop goal - and how it's making a comeback