Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New year, new WRU? The finer details suggest otherwise...

Wales v Ireland - Guinness Women's Six Nations - Cardiff Arms Park, Photo: Getty Images

New year, new WRU? I think not. Christmas seemingly came early for the Welsh women’s squad, who are now set to be granted ‘professional’ contracts from January 1 next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

A total of ten full time contracts and fifteen retainer contracts will be offered to the women’s squad. My timeline was flooded with people coming out to congratulate the WRU on its investment in the women’s game, yet I saw very little criticism – perhaps because the finer details where only revealed in a press conference later in the day.

When you look deeper into this so called ‘investment’ it really is laughable. Each full-time contract is set to be worth around £19,000 per year, with retainer players earning significantly less on £7,500.

You would earn more working as a Retail Sales Associate in Aldi than you would being a professional female rugby player for Wales, which is ridiculous. These women have mortgages to pay, children to feed – and the WRU expect them to drop it all for a measly £19,000 a year? Then, to add insult to injury, you expect these women to be grateful to the WRU for investing in them? No.

It is not enough to accept this decision and celebrate it, we must question the motives behind the choice, and demand more, we aren’t even scratching the surface here.

I am sick and tired of this grateful narrative that is repeatedly shoved down our throats, women are given scraps and then expected to be ecstatic about it. No. We need to be teaching the next generation, the girls and boys that will come after us, that we deserve more, we are worth more and we need more.

To those who will inevitably come back at me saying the contracts are good news and a positive first step shown by the WRU, I would say I don’t think there is any shame in asking for more. In fact, I think the shame lies in accepting something that is significantly lower that what you deserve.

ADVERTISEMENT

You’re effectively telling these women and the rest of the world that they aren’t worth it, which let’s face it doesn’t stem too far from the WRU’s behaviour in the past few years.

It is possible that the news is only being so well received because the WRU set such a low bar for themselves with its treatment of the women’s team, that this miniscule offering is seen as something far bigger than it actually is.

Let me be clear here, fault does not lie with the players themselves. I actually think it’s a smart move from the WRU to frame the decision as a joint one between the players and the union. They are unable to criticise the decision because they supposedly chose it themselves. Their hands are tied, and they must adhere to showing the world they are grateful for the investment, when actually behind closed doors they have very different thoughts.

In the video below, Wales captain Siwan Lillicrap gives credit to the 123 players who banded together to write an open letter to the WRU demanding more. She also speaks of the consultations which have been happening behind closed doors over the past few months. Although this is admirable, as Ali Donnelly hints at below, it must be exhausting being a female in sports. Players have to fight tooth and nail to receive the bare minimum and are then expected to brand it up as a fantastic opportunity.

ADVERTISEMENT

When a decision like this is made, its always essential to analyse the motivations behind it. A few weeks ago, we saw arguably one of the best women’s rugby players come out and indirectly criticise the WRU for its lack of investment. After Jaz Joyce inadvertently called out the WRU, we started to see some rumblings of change. This added to the pressure mounting from the open letter signed by 123 former players, and we saw the WRU appoint two interim coaches to guide the squad to the World Cup. With yesterday’s news in mind, the question of authenticity must be raised here. Did the decision stem from a genuine want to invest and build in the women’s game, or was the WRU attempting to rebuild its shambolic reputation in the rugby world?

We need to be inspiring younger children to ask for more, we need to move out of this cautious gratitude to unashamed ambition. We need to be teaching young girls to ask for more, and to do that we have to lead by example and take no less than what we deserve.

This offering is an insult. If you are going to do something, then do it properly. Women’s rugby has fallen into a gratuity trap, and we need to break out of it. I am sick of saying thank you for receiving the bare minimum in this sport. If you think the issues in this article are restricted to women’s rugby alone, you are wrong. They run deep into the fabric of society, and its about time some one started asking for more, after all if you don’t ask you don’t get.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 9 hours ago
How the four-team format will help the Wallabies defeat the Lions

Have to imagine it was a one off sorta thing were they were there (saying playing against the best private schools) because that is the level they could play at. I think I got carried away and misintrepted what you were saying, or maybe it was just that I thought it was something that should be brought in.


Of course now school is seen as so much more important, and sports as much more important to schooling, that those rural/public gets get these scholarships/free entry to play at private schools.


This might only be relevant in the tradition private rugby schools, so not worth implementing, but the same drain has been seen in NZ to the point where the public schools are not just impacted by the lost of their best talent to private schools, there is a whole flow on effect of losing players to other sports their school can' still compete at the highest levels in, and staff quality etc. So now and of that traditional sort of rivalry is near lost as I understand it.


The idea to force the top level competition into having equal public school participation would be someway to 'force' that neglect into reverse. The problem with such a simple idea is of course that if good rugby talent decides to stay put in order to get easier exposure, they suffer academically on principle. I wonder if a kid who say got selected for a school rep 1st/2nd team before being scouted by a private school, or even just say had two or three years there, could choose to rep their old school for some of their rugby still?


Like say a new Cup style comp throughout the season, kid's playing for the private school in their own local/private school grade comp or whatever, but when its Cup games they switch back? Better represent, areas, get more 2nd players switching back for top level 1st comp at their old school etc? Just even in order to have cool stories where Ella or Barrett brothers all switch back to show their old school is actually the best of the best?

115 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks' Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks'
Search