Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New year, new WRU? The finer details suggest otherwise...

Wales v Ireland - Guinness Women's Six Nations - Cardiff Arms Park, Photo: Getty Images

New year, new WRU? I think not. Christmas seemingly came early for the Welsh women’s squad, who are now set to be granted ‘professional’ contracts from January 1 next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

A total of ten full time contracts and fifteen retainer contracts will be offered to the women’s squad. My timeline was flooded with people coming out to congratulate the WRU on its investment in the women’s game, yet I saw very little criticism – perhaps because the finer details where only revealed in a press conference later in the day.

When you look deeper into this so called ‘investment’ it really is laughable. Each full-time contract is set to be worth around £19,000 per year, with retainer players earning significantly less on £7,500.

You would earn more working as a Retail Sales Associate in Aldi than you would being a professional female rugby player for Wales, which is ridiculous. These women have mortgages to pay, children to feed – and the WRU expect them to drop it all for a measly £19,000 a year? Then, to add insult to injury, you expect these women to be grateful to the WRU for investing in them? No.

It is not enough to accept this decision and celebrate it, we must question the motives behind the choice, and demand more, we aren’t even scratching the surface here.

I am sick and tired of this grateful narrative that is repeatedly shoved down our throats, women are given scraps and then expected to be ecstatic about it. No. We need to be teaching the next generation, the girls and boys that will come after us, that we deserve more, we are worth more and we need more.

To those who will inevitably come back at me saying the contracts are good news and a positive first step shown by the WRU, I would say I don’t think there is any shame in asking for more. In fact, I think the shame lies in accepting something that is significantly lower that what you deserve.

ADVERTISEMENT

You’re effectively telling these women and the rest of the world that they aren’t worth it, which let’s face it doesn’t stem too far from the WRU’s behaviour in the past few years.

It is possible that the news is only being so well received because the WRU set such a low bar for themselves with its treatment of the women’s team, that this miniscule offering is seen as something far bigger than it actually is.

Let me be clear here, fault does not lie with the players themselves. I actually think it’s a smart move from the WRU to frame the decision as a joint one between the players and the union. They are unable to criticise the decision because they supposedly chose it themselves. Their hands are tied, and they must adhere to showing the world they are grateful for the investment, when actually behind closed doors they have very different thoughts.

In the video below, Wales captain Siwan Lillicrap gives credit to the 123 players who banded together to write an open letter to the WRU demanding more. She also speaks of the consultations which have been happening behind closed doors over the past few months. Although this is admirable, as Ali Donnelly hints at below, it must be exhausting being a female in sports. Players have to fight tooth and nail to receive the bare minimum and are then expected to brand it up as a fantastic opportunity.

ADVERTISEMENT

When a decision like this is made, its always essential to analyse the motivations behind it. A few weeks ago, we saw arguably one of the best women’s rugby players come out and indirectly criticise the WRU for its lack of investment. After Jaz Joyce inadvertently called out the WRU, we started to see some rumblings of change. This added to the pressure mounting from the open letter signed by 123 former players, and we saw the WRU appoint two interim coaches to guide the squad to the World Cup. With yesterday’s news in mind, the question of authenticity must be raised here. Did the decision stem from a genuine want to invest and build in the women’s game, or was the WRU attempting to rebuild its shambolic reputation in the rugby world?

We need to be inspiring younger children to ask for more, we need to move out of this cautious gratitude to unashamed ambition. We need to be teaching young girls to ask for more, and to do that we have to lead by example and take no less than what we deserve.

This offering is an insult. If you are going to do something, then do it properly. Women’s rugby has fallen into a gratuity trap, and we need to break out of it. I am sick of saying thank you for receiving the bare minimum in this sport. If you think the issues in this article are restricted to women’s rugby alone, you are wrong. They run deep into the fabric of society, and its about time some one started asking for more, after all if you don’t ask you don’t get.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

j
johnz 47 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

This is such a devisive issue in New Zealand, Razor is a brave man; people tend to take polarising stands of all or nothing positions. I suspect there's a balanced compromise, if people are able to discuss the pros and cons rationally. There are good arguments from both sides of the debate, and as with all controversial issues, the solution is rarely black and white.


But let's take the Barrett vs Mounga debate, a topic that never grows old. I think some context is in order when Barrett is proclaimed as "loyal", while it seems to be insinuated that Mo'unga is not.


A little history is needed regarding Barrett's loyalty - so far he has had 2 (or 3?) sabbaticals, which are really just overseas-based All Black's by stealth. Since he left the Hurricanes, he's 'been a bit part player at the Blues at best, while his performances at SR level have left plenty to be desired. As of last season, he quit NZ Rugby for Japan. It's concievable the rise of Mounga played a part in that decision, while Mounga's subsequent departure appears to have played a part in BB's return.


Prior to returning, BB tried to negotiate a contract to be the 1st official overseas-based player. So loyal? Maybe. Opportunistic? Probably. It's clear Barrett's first instinct was not commitment and sacrifice to the coalface of Super Rugby.


I don't recall a Mo'unga being awarded a sabatical at all, and he has been a far bigger contributor than Barrett has at Super Rugby level for quite some time. Perhaps NZR just didn't value Mo'unga enough to bend the rules the same as they have for Barrett?


NZR have always massaged the rules for Barrett and expended a lot of financial resources to keep his services. At the same time, our player depth get's stripped away, as premier SR players, such as Plumber and Burke, take off for better pay cheques elsewhere.


Personally, I wouldn't mind if the big wage bill for a few aging stars like Barrett are shared with Japan. I'm not convinced Barrett's adding much at SR level and the money could be used elsewhere. Just as long as there's no guarantee of a jersey for such marque players, I don't see a big issue.

33 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Welsh regional rugby has failed conclusively and there is no way back' 'Welsh regional rugby has failed conclusively and there is no way back'
Search