Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New Zealand continue their winning streak in the World School's Festival as Westlake take the spoils

Westlake prevailed against a spirited St Michael's side from Ireland

In a match hosted at the Pattana Sports Resort in Thailand, Westlake Boys’ of New Zealand secured victory in the World Schools Rugby Festival, prevailing over Ireland’s St Michael’s College in a closely contested 28-21 win. The tournament, known for attracting top schools from around the world, witnessed Westlake Boys’ adding to New Zealand’s rugby legacy.

ADVERTISEMENT

The setting for the match, just an hour from Bangkok, provided an international backdrop for the tournament, highlighting school’s rugby’s global appeal. The competition featured teams from various countries, such as England, South Africa, Wales and Ireland showcasing their skills and strategies on an inclusive platform.

Westlake Boys’ faced St Michael’s College in a hard-fought match, with both teams exhibiting tactical prowess. The closely contested encounter saw Westlake Boys’ demonstrating their proficiency in both the pack and backlines. The decisive moment came when Westlake Boys’ secured a from their superstar 12, Jarlon Lesatele, establishing a lead that proved insurmountable for their Irish counterparts.

St Michael’s put in a spirited performance, coming back from 14-0 down at half time and giving the Auckland-based side a serious scare.

@rugbypass This is just amazing 🔥 #rugby #WSF2023 #rugbyboys ? original sound – F✝️🅱️L®️5️⃣

The final whistle marked Westlake Boys’ School’s victory in the World Schools Rugby Festival, underscoring New Zealand’s ongoing dominance in the competition in recent years. This achievement follows the 2022 tournament, where Hamilton Boys’ High claimed victory by defeating Grey College from South Africa.

Looking ahead to future editions, questions arise about potential participants. Many express the desire to see Grey College back in the tournament, given their impressive performance in 2022. Additionally, there is anticipation for the inclusion of Kelston Boys’ from New Zealand and schools from France, adding further international flavour to the competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, the significant digital audience cannot be overlooked, as over 5000 viewers tuned in to watch the live stream of the final. This substantial viewership underscores the growing global interest in school-level rugby and highlights the World Schools Rugby Festival’s role in connecting fans worldwide with the sport. As the rugby community reflects on the recent tournament and looks ahead, discussions around potential participants and the remarkable viewership emphasize the enduring appeal and international reach of this prestigious event.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
J
Jan-Charl 368 days ago

Winning against South African teams that are not even in the top ten of the country. This world school festival should be named, second rate schools festival not world schools festival as non of the worlds top schools actually play in it. What a joke of a tournament

M
Mzilikazi 370 days ago

“Looking ahead to future editions, questions arise about potential participants”. How are the schools selected ? St Michael’s were not the top school in Leinster last year.

Gonzaga won the Schools Cup last season, beating giants Blackrock in the final. St Michaels did reach the semi, narrowly beaten by Blackrock.

Looking at the SA schools, I’m not an expert there, but have some knowledge of the rugby schools. I would have thought any of Paarl Gim, Grey College, Paarl Boys, Bishops would be around the top schools ?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 20 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search