Northern | US

New Zealand Rugby to consolidate Super Rugby and NPC from 2028

New Zealand Rugby Interim CEO Steve Lancaster, during a press conference announcing the assistant coaches for the New Zealand All Blacks on March 24, 2026 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)
Comments
10 Comments

New Zealand rugby has moved to streamline its professional pathways and operations by consolidating the NPC and Super Rugby from 2028.

ADVERTISEMENT

The changes come as the union looks to cut spending by five per cent, and are expected to come with the added benefit of simplifying the pathways system and freeing up resources to better promote the NPC and focus on the community game.

With a more direct spine from community level to the professional game, NZR expects the changes to improve community rugby, high performance and financial outcomes. The changes also include stronger player protections for talent coming through the regional unions, helping keep them in local pathways.

VIDEO

The plan confirms the two competitions and each of their 19 teams’ futures in New Zealand after a period of uncertainty stemming from the revelation of NZR’s financial woes. The governing body faces a “structural deficit” of approximately $20 million NZD per year.

Super Rugby will become more independent when the changes take effect, but NZR will work closely with Rugby Australia and the competition’s stakeholders to transform it with what NZR describes as “more ambition and bold thinking.”

NZR CEO Steve Lancaster said: “New Zealanders should be proud of what sets us apart as a rugby nation, being the layers in our game from club and school to the NPC, Super Rugby and the All Blacks.

“We are making changes to our game from a position of strength, and we have two men’s competitions that support the All Blacks to win, excite fans and players and, with these changes, can be financially successful.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Together with our stakeholders, we’re now focused on improving the way Super Rugby Pacific engages fans, continuing to strengthen the NPC and ensuring talented players can develop in a clear, aligned pathway.

“We’re aligned with Rugby Australia and the Super Rugby clubs that we need people who wake up every day focused on engaging fans, growing revenue and working with broadcasters and the media.

“We’re open to working on things like player movement, a competition-wide salary cap and centralising commercial assets across the key markets.

“Those are conversations we will now have with Rugby Australia, the Rugby Players Association and the Super Rugby clubs. We know it’s a great product on the field and it now needs to generate the level of attendance and revenue that it warrants.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Lancaster’s comments signal an open-minded approach from NZR to growing Super Rugby as a competition, though it remains to be seen how aligned their Australian counterparts and other stakeholders are.

NZR High Performance Director Don Tricker endorsed the changes for how they can benefit the All Blacks.

“One of the most important factors in developing players the All Blacks want to select is having competitions that excite players and energise our fans,” he said.

“For 30 years, Super Rugby has proven to be a great competition that meets a key high performance principle, which is to ensure that our best players are playing with and against each other more often. The NPC is equally as critical to ensuring that our pipeline of talented players maintains its depth through 14 teams.”

NZR Chief Rugby Officer Mike Collins said the union will be better placed to invest time in the NPC once it is free from some Super Rugby operational duties. Once it completes a review of community rugby delivery, NZR hopes to be better placed to act on its findings.

“The NPC is absolutely the jewel in New Zealand rugby’s pathway and provides opportunities for players wherever they are in the country. It keeps our playing base wide and is critical to player, coach and referee development,” Collins said.

“While these changes will reduce duplication and cost, more importantly they simplify rugby operations and player pathways in our major cities and ensure we are operating as one team from community rugby through to the All Blacks.

“We want the community and professional game working as one, with a single, clear pathway for talented school leavers into professional and international rugby.”

1 YEAR TO GO - RWC27

1 YEAR TO GO 

The countdown is on until the biggest Men’s Rugby World Cup ever kicks off in Australia. Go All Out and secure your seats with tickets now available! 

BUY TICKETS NOW

Watch the Dakar 2026 Youth Olympic Games Rugby Sevens

Enjoy all of the Rugby Sevens matches from the Dakar 2026 Summer Youth Olympic Games live and free

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
T
Ting Tong 9 hours ago

That rubbish sounds like it was written by AI.

W
Wayneo 9 hours ago

“Consolidating pathways” and “bold thinking” are just poetic ways of saying “we’re broke and desperately need to delete 5% of our budget”


At this rate I won’t be surprised if folks have to pay a premium subscription just to watch the “competition merger” presentation.

B
BleedRed&Black 9 hours ago

Be a big change if NZR are able to force through the changes in the Super rugby host unions. The SR organisations will end up running the Otago, Canterbury, Wellington, Waikato and Auckland NPC teams, just like they do in SA, where the URC teams run their Currie Cup team.


Assistant coaches, maybe even head coaches from the SR teams will be given the NPC head coach job as part of succession planning. There will be a lot of crossover in general between the teams to create a coherent coaching group. NZR made a massive mistake 15 years ago forcing a divorce between SR and host province NPC. Hopefully that is about to be undone.


Crucially, there will be no provincial academies in the host unions. They at least will be run by the SR organisations. Crusaders will be unaffected, they have run the academy in Christchurch for more than twenty years, but the Auckland/Waikato/Otago academies will be amalgamated with Blues/Chiefs/Highlanders, while the Hurricanes will take over the Wellington academy. Just like happened with Canterbury when Crusaders took them over.


All those organisations will then be focused on developing players through to SR level, not just NPC. Standards will rise in the host provinces as the demands on the players increase. It will however create a two tier development system, where development players drift to the SR hosts because of those higher standards and perception of access to SR contracts.


That will in all likelihood lead to the SR teams taking over the academies outside the host provinces as well, so Blues taking over the North Harbour academy. Again, just like happened when the Crusaders took over the Tasman academy in 2015. I get the feeling that is what NZR wants, the Crusaders being best practice and all that.


As for the non-host unions fear that the host unions will take all the best players, that's limited by the salary cap and the fact that once the SR organisations are running their local NPC team they will look to only recruit players into that NPC team who are in/will be available for their SR team, contributing to their SR player development. Giving NPC minutes to players who are in another SR team is effectively cannibalizing your own SR teams PD, which from a SR point of view is nuts.


Canterbury, for example, had nine players in its NPC final team that were not available for the Crusaders 2027. Once Canterbury NPC is run by the Crusaders, not Canterbury RFU, they will have no reason to give contracts to those nine players. Canterbury will be defined primarily by how much it helps the Crusaders, not an entity in its own right.


So no more Isaac Hutchinson, [Chiefs] Jone Rova [Hurricanes] and Sam Darry, [Blues] but contracts for Rivez Reihana, Jake Te Hiwi and Xavier Saifoloi, all of which are 2027 Crusaders.


It is entirely possible that in time the SR organisations running their own team and the host unions NPC team will also end up running the other NPC teams in their franchise area as well as their academies, so Crusaders running Tasman, Canterbury and itself. Now that's alignment.

W
Wayneo 8 hours ago

Do you think they will relax the player eligibility requirements?


IMHO, I don’t see how the NZR can sustain hemorrhaging NZD $20 million annual and will inevitably have to bin them completely to survive.

B
B 9 hours ago

Is NPC fully professional right across the board? As in contracted/salaried?


Or is just ‘pay as you play’ - I’ve limited access to it in my part of the world and always found it hard to get a firm answer


Some of what they propose makes sense but I agree that the obvious problem could be around a two tier development system with players chasing the academy rather than the club

S
SS 10 hours ago

Firm handshakes ouens. Absolutely useless union bosses (NZ and literally any and all others). “relaxed selection policy for Aussie clubs”? What in the name of martha anderson are these clowns talking about??? Show me any AB or potetnial AB that would rather play for Brumbies instead of Saders? These guys have no clue what they are doing and must be the greediest breed of human alive.

A
Alex 11 hours ago

….how is it different to what we have now?

A
Andrew Nichols 11 hours ago

Indeed. I see nothing that tells us what “streamlining” means.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close