Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New Zealand rugby set for conflict as provincial unions reject NZR's recommendations

New Zealand Rugby Union headquarters in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

The provincial unions have rejected NZR’s ‘Proposal 1’ governance changes, instead voting in ‘Proposal 2’ at the New Zealand Rugby special general meeting held in Wellington today.

ADVERTISEMENT

Proposal 2, put forward as an alternative plan by the provincial unions to the recommendations given by the Pilkington Report last year, garnered more than two thirds of the votes required with 69-21 in favour.

A key sticking point of Proposal 2’s plan is that three of the nine NZR board members must have experience on a provincial board.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

Proposal 1 backed by NZR and the NZRPA wanted nine independent directors.

NZRPA Chief Rob Nichol has been vocal in his opposition to Proposal 2, threatening to create a breakaway governance model should it by voted in.

That has become reality now as the provincial unions rallied to shoot down Proposal One.

The NZRPA along with high profiler ex-All Blacks, such as Richie McCaw, Ian Kirkpatrick, Sean Fitzpatrick and Sir John Kirwan, urged the provinces to endorse an independent board under Proposal 1.

The landmark decision threatens to ripple through New Zealand Rugby with conflict now inevitable should Nichol and the NZRPA follow through with his threats.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video

South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Lions Share | Episode 5

Play Video

Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

Play Video

The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

Play Video

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

Play Video

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

17 Comments
J
JW 425 days ago

The provincial unions have rejected NZR’s ‘Proposal 1’ governance changes

Wait, wasn’t in the NZR Board that voted today?


That would be why the vote passed, it support from other key members, either NZR, the RPA, or Maori and other etc. Otherwise we would have the status quo until a better proposal came along.


The voting is of course secret, but I’ll be interested who shares their votes and were the tipping point came from. We know it likely, from wehat they have publicly said, that several PUs stopped proposal 1 from happening, but that wasn’t enough votes to elect proposal 2.


I don’t see why all board members aren’t required to have served time with a union. Obviously that can’t be on the board, as there are only so many places available, I assume, but to me that is what a board should be. Just like how canterbury said Fonterra’s board is all made up of former (or maybe still) farmers. I would laugh to find out of that statement wasn’t true though.


Good day for NZ Rugby, excited to see if RPA can setup another body to ensure their interestes. Hopefully this new board would say that all NPC players join the RPA, as they rightfully should, and then we can possible see a true sustainable future at the top of our game rather than this b@arstad SR setup.

C
Chiefs Mana 425 days ago

NZR's voting members comprise of the 26 Provincial Unions and the New Zealand Māori Rugby Board - there were 90 votes all up and this is based on larger provinces with more unions having more votes.

B
Blair 425 days ago

Shame on the PU’s I say. It sounds like old boys who don’t want to give up their grasp on power. Let’s hope we can move through this quickly

C
Chiefs Mana 425 days ago

I reckon you’ve hit the nail on the head - this is self-interest playing out again just like we’ve seen for decades. They know they wouldn’t stand a chance on getting on this board otherwise through a proper, competitive process.

N
NHinSH 426 days ago

Very interested to see what happens, your move NZRPA

C
Chiefs Mana 425 days ago

Feel like they’ve called NZRPA bluff well (as much as i disagree with the result).

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

T
TL 1 hour ago
'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

I agree, the comparison to Rassie in 2021 is unfair. Schmidt despite being highly emotional was scrupulous in not making it a personal grudge match, and in the circumstances I think he behaved in a decent way. What Rassie did was unhinged and extreme. Why fudge the two together? It’s much more common for coaches to do what Joe did, and it was unusual for him, he resisted efforts of journo’s to get him talking about the cards that weren’t in Test 1. He’s taken exception in this instance, if he was doing it all the time I’d dismiss it, but he’s got some cred so I take it a little more seriously when he speaks up.


Otherwise Mr Bishop/ Nick you have yet again proven your acumen as a selector and tactician this series, making calls before not after the event, like any good analyst would. Schmidt was cruelled by injuries this series, more than was apparent initially. In both games injuries to Bobby V and Skelton’s fitness hampered the WBs, and Gleeson in Test 1, and Noah before, and JAS leading in. Picking TT would have been a huge risk after SR form, but yes, seems like it would have been worth taking in hindsight and many were suggesting before. We just don’t have the depth for that not to make a big impact. But Joe seems to have put his chips on Williams as long termer and is investing in him, like he did players in Ireland, when Williams is yet to deliver in this series (although the lineout has been solid when he’s on). Perhaps his time will come. JAS defence is perhaps the biggest issue as Nick you’ve pointed out now on multiple occasions. I just get flummoxed myself thinking about it, as any solution creates another problem, perhaps he just needs time and it just had to be this way….At the very least we need an A/B test and see what the experiment uncovers.


As an Australian I stick to the paradoxical blend of unrealistic optimism and fatalism in reflecting on these decisions that has at once been the blessing and cruse of our culture historically.

21 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne 'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne