Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New Zealand schoolboy rugby players to be tested for drugs

Photo: Getty Images

For the first time in New Zealand school sports history, players at this year’s National 1st XV semi-finals will be subject to anti-doping testing, reports Scotty Stevenson.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New Zealand Secondary School Sports Council (NZSSSC) and Drug Free Sport NZ (DFSNZ) have advised school principals of their intention to carry out anti-doping testing at this year’s 1st XV national top four tournament – an unprecedented move in high school sport in New Zealand.

Yesterday, principals of the top rugby schools in the country were advised of the plan via an email from NZSSSC CEO Garry Carnachan. One spoken to yesterday said the plan poses “a consenting nightmare” given players are in some cases as young as 14 or 15.

In an accompanying letter from DFSNZ Chief Executive Graeme Steele, it is noted that players under 18 will have the ability to be accompanied by parents or other representatives during all elements of the test. But DFSNZ says it does not require consent to test athletes who are participating in any sport that is a signee to New Zealand Sport’s Anti-Doping Rules – and New Zealand Rugby is.

A spokesperson said that while it is the first time DFSNZ has tested in a secondary schools event, they can test any athlete of any age at any time and have in the past tested school-aged athletes.

It seems clear that there is a genuine worry that some high school rugby players in New Zealand could be taking banned substances, either due to a lack of education around “extensive and uncontrolled supplement use” or, worse, through the use of anabolic steroids.

The NZSSSC points to research from Otago University that says there is knowledge that anabolic steroid use is occurring in “comparable environments overseas, notably South Africa and the UK” and says DFSNZ has identified elements within the schools rugby environment which indicate “a significant potential for doping to occur.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Steele adds in his letter that he is “hopeful our approach will receive the full support of the school community and all parents who see sport as a valuable tool for the development of their child.”

The NZSSSC says it supports an education approach, but also knows that as New Zealand Rugby is has  committed to New Zealand Sport’s Anti-doping rules. If DFSNZ undertakes tests that return positive for banned substances, they will have to follow the New Zealand Sport Anti-Doping processes accordingly.

It is understood that that schools will all have to go through a ‘Good Clean Sports – Youth’ workshop before the national tournament, which is scheduled to take place in Palmerston North in September. This gives schools little more than a month to schedule the workshop, address the myriad issues around parental consent, and learn about the specific substances that will be tested for.

According to DFSNZ, those workshops have been available to schools since February and, remarkably, only five of the 24 schools still in contention for the national Top 4 tournament have taken up the chance to take part since that time. According to sources, one high profile rugby school said it wanted nothing to do with the workshop or the education programme around it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Top 4 testing plan, as outlined, will limit the range of substances being tested for, and will “focus on substances with long term health consequences for adolescents and limits the risk of inadvertent positive tests.” Only players from boys’ schools will be tested at the tournament, which also features co-ed and girls’ school teams.

This approach was championed by Carnachan in his email to principals, in which he says, “Given the potential for a player to test positive and the high stakes of doing so, NZSSSC has worked extensively with DFSNZ and NZR to ensure that the risk of such an outcome for those who are not setting out to break the rules is minimised.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BeamMeUp 3 hours ago
The Springboks have something you don't have

A few comments. Firstly, I am a Bok fan and it's been a golden period for us. I hope my fellow Bok fans appreciate this time and know that it cannot last forever, so soak it all in!


The other thing to mention (and this is targeted at Welsh, English and even Aussie supporters who might be feeling somewhat dejected) is that it's easy to forget that just before Rassie Erasmus took over in 2018, the Boks were ranked 7th in the world and I had given up hope we'd ever be world beaters again.


Sport is a fickle thing and Rassie and his team have managed to get right whatever little things it takes to make a mediocre team great. I initially worried his methods might be short-lived (how many times can you raise a person's commitment by talking about his family and his love of his country as a motivator), but he seems to have found a way. After winning in 2019 on what was a very simple game plan, he has taken things up ever year - amazing work which has to be applauded! (Dankie Rassie! Ons wardeer wat jy vir die ondersteuners en die land doen!) (Google translate if you don't understand Afrikaans! 😁)


I don't think people outside South Africa fully comprehend the enormity of the impact seeing black and white, English, Afrikaans and Xhosa and all the other hues playing together does for the country's sense of unity. It's pure joy and happiness.


This autumn tour has been a bit frustrating in that the Boks have won, but never all that convincingly. On the one hand, I'd like to have seen more decisive victories, BUT what Rassie has done is expose a huge number of players to test rugby, whilst also diversifying the way the Boks play (Tony Brown's influence).


This change of both style and personnel has resulted in a lack of cohesion at times and we've lost some of the control, whereas had we been playing our more traditional style, that wouldn't happen. This is partially attributable to the fact that you cannot play Tony Brown's expansive game whilst also having 3 players available at every contact point to clear the defence off the ball. I have enjoyed seeing the Boks play a more exciting, less attritional game, which is a boring, albeit effective spectacle. So, I am happy to be patient, because the end justifies the means (and I trust Rassie!). Hopefully all these players we are blooding will give us incredible options for substitutions come next year's Rugby Championship and of course, the big prize in 2027.


Last point! The game of rugby has never been as exciting as it is now. Any of Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Argentina, Scotland, England & Australia can beat one another. South Africa may be ranked #1, but I wouldn't bet my house in them beating France or New Zealand, and we saw Argentina beating both South Africa and New Zealand this year! That's wonderful for the game and makes the victories we do get all the sweeter. Each win is 100% earned. Long may it last!


Sorry for the long post! 🏉🌍

12 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Wallabies have a serious problem The Wallabies have a serious problem
Search