Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New Zealand's elite players would be better served trying to win the odd test match rather than dictating terms of the Silver Lake deal

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Let’s assume the New Zealand Rugby Players’ Association are the smartest guys in the room.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s assume that it’s only the NZRPA and not the staff at New Zealand Rugby (NZR) and their board, nor our 26 provincial unions, who can see any issues with the proposed Silver Lake private equity deal.

Let’s also assume that it’s only the NZRPA – and none of the other folk mentioned above – who have the game’s best interests at heart.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks share their toughest opponents | Healthspan Elite

Video Spacer

The All Blacks share their toughest opponents | Healthspan Elite

While we’re at it, let’s also assume the NZRPA have more integrity and vision than anyone at SA Rugby or Rugby Australia. Both those outfits – like NZR – are going down the private equity route in an effort to bankroll the game in their country.

More fool them, eh?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but this is the narrative we’re being sold, right? That NZR and the provincial unions are dullards, who are going to sell off the family silver for a few years of prosperity, but will ultimately go broke.

That the NZRPA can see this clear as day and by declining to endorse the deal with Silver Lake, are saving rugby in New Zealand from the halfwits who laughably call themselves the guardians of our game.

Again, feel free to jump in any time, because I’d hate to misrepresent the NZRPA’s position here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Silver Lake – as we’re all well aware by now – are offering NZR $387.5 million for a 12.5 percent stake in a newly-created entity called Commercial LP.

New Zealand Rugby, as they’ve been at pains to point out, need this money in order to stay afloat. They put it in more positive terms than that, highlighting all the worthy programmes and initiatives the Silver Lake loot would fund, but this money basically represents the difference between having to shut up shop and not.

The union have just posted a deficit of more than $34m for the 2020 financial year and – to be perfectly frank – are going broke trying to satisfy the wage demands of the NZRPA.
It’s hard to pin down exactly what the NZRPA don’t like about the Silver Lake deal, other than they don’t like it. As senior All Black Dane Coles put it, by way of explanation, they don’t want the team becoming a “comic book.’’

Never mind the NZRPA’s cartoonish ideas of what might suit them better, such as NZR selling a stake 5 percent in the All Blacks to the man and woman in the street.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby is broke now. In New Zealand, in Australia, in South Africa and money – and lots of it – has to come from somewhere.

Never mind five years from now, NZR and the 26 provincial unions are already skint. They’re already making losses and $20 donations from rank-and-file fans won’t really change that.

Short of the players agreeing to pay for free, it is going to take deals such as the Silver Lake one to keep a few of these national bodies in business.

Rob Nichol, the ubiquitous boss of the NZRPA, says his body will come to an agreement with NZR eventually. Which, in recent years, has tended to mean NZR will cave in to the players’ requests.

These same players who, when NZR no longer offers them a wage they feel is worthy of them, inevitably upsticks and go and play somewhere else.

It’s funny, isn’t it? You assume there’s the odd NZR staffer or board member who think they know more about rugby than the All Blacks themselves or their coaches. Who spectacularly overstep the mark occasionally and tell someone such as Coles where they’re going wrong with their lineout throwing.

We would dismiss such a person as a fool and yet here we are, letting players dictate what kind of commercial deals their employers can enter into.

The NZRPA worries that NZR will be broke five years from now. They argue the Silver Lake deal is a poor one, with the potential to bring the game to its knees.

They fear the commercialisation of the All Blacks’ jersey and the haka, as if neither are turning a buck for all concerned already.

Again, you’ll have to forgive me if I’m wrong, but there isn’t a queue of companies lined up around the block, looking to give NZR $400 million. And if there are, none of them are offering that money with no strings attached.

Rather than offering NZR advice of what’s a good deal and what’s not, our elite players would be better served trying to win the odd test match.

For all the players’ business acumen, few All Blacks have come close to justifying their salaries in the last year or so.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hour ago
Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks'

I like the idea of Elrigh Louw as a long-term option for captaincy. Honestly, it’s hard to say who else could take on that role after Siya Kolisi, as 2027 is still a long way off. In my opinion, Siya will likely go to the Rugby World Cup in 2027 unless injury or a significant dip in form prevents him.


Between now and 2027, I think the captaincy will be shared among several players as Siya’s playing time is carefully managed—a strategy the Springboks have been implementing for some time. Younger players like Salmaan Moerat might get opportunities to captain in tier-two matches, as we’ve already seen. Other emerging talents like Jordan Hendrikse and Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu could also be considered, though the Boks have traditionally favored forwards for captaincy roles. Damian Willemse is another possibility, but he first needs to play his way back into the team.


My personal feeling is that there should be an effort to appoint a black captain to replace Siya. His captaincy has been pivotal in broadening rugby's appeal across racial groups in South Africa over the past 7 years. More so than any other period in the last 30 years.


Form permitting, Moerat is a strong contender, given his leadership qualities and pedigree. However, some might view such an appointment as political, potentially overlooking Moerat's real potential and the broader significance of such a decision.


Other players with leadership potential have been mentioned in the past, such as Phepsi Buthelezi. However, it remains to be seen whether the former DHS star will secure a permanent spot in the Springbok lineup. The first Zulu captain of the Springboks? Would be nice, but unlikely given the competition for the 8 jersey.


One positive aspect of the uncertainty around Siya’s long-term successor is the way the Springboks have emphasized shared leadership among senior players. This approach has lessened the pressure on a single captain and allowed the team to thrive collectively.


When Siya was first appointed, there was skepticism about his leadership credentials. And whether he was the best 6 in the country. The shared leadership strategy gave him the support and platform to grow into the exceptional captain he is today. And he's proven critics wrong about his abilities as a player.


I find it interesting that he's playing at 8 for the Sharks. Rassie has made a habit of taking 36ers and above to the World Cup, players who bring options to the table like Frans Steyn, Schalk Brits, Duane Vermeulen and more recently Deon Fourie.


All of SA wants to see Siya win a 3rd World Cup. That's for sure.


And if he goes, he'll lead.

4 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Best forward in the country': Dallaglio calls for new England captain 'Best forward in the country': Dallaglio calls for new England captain
Search