Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Newcastle resigned to being without 3 Pumas for Prem start

(Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images)

Dave Walder, who has taken over the Newcastle Falcons director of rugby role vacated by Dean Richards, is resigned to being without his Argentina trio of Matias Orlando, Matias Moroni and Mateo Carreras for the start of the season.

ADVERTISEMENT

While attention has been focused on the limited use Premiership clubs will get from their England internationals in the league this season with the players likely to appear in just 11 of the 24 rounds due to test match duties and training camps, the requirements of other nations are also impacting the English game.

Centres Orlando and Moroni are in the Pumas team to face New Zealand in Christchurch this weekend while wing Carreras is also in the squad for the Rugby Championship which ends on September 24 and leads into the November test window. Newcastle have to weigh up the benefits of dragging them back to the UK for the short period between international duty as Argentina play England on November 6, Wales November 12 and Scotland November 19.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

It is particularly tough for Walder and Newcastle who have assembled a trio of Pumas they believe can help the club avoid another season of underachievement. Moroni is waiting to make his Newcastle debut having helped Leicester win the Premiership title last season.

Walder has moved up from head coach to replace Richards who is expected to have and advisory role with the club and said: “We can call them back in their weeks off but by the time you bring them back from Argentina to then go back it’s not worth it. We start against Harlequins at home on September 10 and the Argentine players are in the Rugby Championship squad while Quins won’t have their England guys and possibly Andre Esterhuizen who broke his arm. I want to see as many of my players appearing in test rugby as possible but there is a part of me saying that you shoot yourself in the foot.”

Walder’s view of the problem created by having England internationals away for long periods is central contracts which have not been possible in the English game as the players are “ loaned” from the clubs. He added: “You are almost in the argument for centrally contracted players because you get the situation where players are only available for 11 rounds of the Premiership and if you are an owner and you are paying someone top dollar but not getting for more half the season, then it becomes very interesting.

Related

“Clubs are going to have to decide how many guaranteed England players they can carry in their squad when they are away for so long. It’s a big dilemma. From the outside looking in it must seem madness and off the top of my head I cannot think of an easy answer. Somebody is going to have to take the financial hit.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Personally, I can see why coaches would take the attitude that why are we are paying a player 100 per cent of his wages and only seeing him for 50 per cent of the season. “

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
c
chris 849 days ago

Would central contracts be acceptable to the clubs and would they work?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search