Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Nigel Owens calls for law rethink after incident during Italy-Scotland

Referee Nigel Owens gestures to France's prop Jefferson Poirot (R) during the Six Nations international rugby union match between England and France at Twickenham stadium in south-west London on February 10, 2019. (Photo by Adrian DENNIS / AFP) (Photo credit should read ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP via Getty Images)

Revered retired rugby referee Nigel Owens has voiced his concerns over the current rugby law relating to holding a player up over the goal line.

ADVERTISEMENT

The incident in question occurred at the Stadio Stadio Olimpico when Scotland’s Duhan van der Merwe lifted and held up Italy’s fullback Ange Capuozzo in Scotland’s dead ball area, winning a goal-line drop-out for Scotland.

According to the Laws of the game “When a player carrying the ball is held up in-goal, so that the player cannot ground the ball or play the ball, the ball is dead. Play restarts with a goal line drop-out or a 5m scrum, depending on how the ball entered.”

Video Spacer

‘Ireland’s true test will come in July’ – Boks Office | RPTV

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 1:42
Loaded: 0.00%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 1:42
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    ‘Ireland’s true test will come in July’ – Boks Office | RPTV

    The Boks Office crew dispel the notion that Ireland are the best team in the world right now. Watch the full show exclusively on RugbyPass TV

    Watch now

    Owens – who retired in 2020 – isn’t a fan of the law.

    Owens criticized the goal-line dropout rule for players being held up, arguing that the law favours defensive play over attacking efforts. He stated, “That is why I don’t like the goal line drop out held up law. We should be giving the benefit of the doubt and rewarding the attacking team not the defence. The game is far too much defence-oriented already.”

    His comments have ignited a conversation about the balance between attack and defence in rugby on X, with many supporting Owens’ call for a reevaluation of the rules to encourage and reward attacking play when these incidents occur.

    Related

     

    ADVERTISEMENT
    LIVE

    Australia vs Wales | Women's International

    Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

    Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

    The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    5 Comments
    G
    Gareth 502 days ago

    They also need to look at the scrum it's becoming a pointless part of the game. Scrum halfs practically putting it in the no8 feet . They just aswell just give a free kick hooker's used to be able to try and nick the odd one against the head so it was worth having a scrum just pointless now front row be obsolete soon. And I don't know if they have a front row specialist up with the tmo but they should because these refs have no clue what's going on there. Just a quick question on the radio and get the correct decision because their guessing at and get a lot wrong.

    M
    Morris 502 days ago

    That's great observation. The other absurd ruling is the double punishment of penalty try. In itself it punishment enough but adding a yellow card is just too much. This is a sport

    M
    MJ 503 days ago

    I think the law was changed to discourage pick and goes, and lineout mauls near the line…. But, as it goes with many law changes made to embellish the game, it hasn't worked.

    B
    Bull Shark 501 days ago

    Agreed. I remember that if a try was held up, the attacking team would be awarded a scrum. That would bring more scrums into the game which everyone seems to be against these days.


    I think more scrums would make the game more interesting. Especially 5m scrums. We’d see push over scrums (rare these days) and/or backline moves off scrums 5m out from the line. Much sexier than maul tries imho.


    Scrums have never been easier to officiate. TMOs, assistant refs are all looking for the same things now. The early shove. Limbs on the ground. Not scrumming straight. This has made scrums better for the viewer.


    But there are two areas that need to be addressed. Fewer restarts, I.e. immediate free kicks for not putting the ball in straight, early engages or technical faults. The good old ball to the 8th man and the quick tap needs a come back.


    Scrumhalves must also go back to putting the ball in straight. So that defending teams can compete for the ball. Same concept as a lineout. This will make scrums more than just about brute force but also about winning the ball first and then putting the shove on.


    Simple fixes - I love scrums. Long live the scrum.

    A
    Andrew 502 days ago

    Yes it was, trams and WR didn't like those kinds of tries. They only wanted flashy tries, I still say if you don’t like the way some teams play, find a better way to beat them, if you can’t do that then and want to stop watching, go watch Rugby League. Rugby is for all shapes and sizes, tacking the maul and scrum away prevents this.

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    TRENDING
    TRENDING Fissler Confidential: All Black to give Falcons wings Fissler Confidential: All Black to give Falcons wings