Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Nigel Owens' verdict on the 20-minute red card trial

Nigel Owens at work as a referee in 2019 (Photo by Athena Pictures/Getty Images)

Retired referee Nigel Owens has shared his verdict on the 20-minute red card trial which has been used in The Rugby Championship and Super Rugby Pacific. It was last May when World Rugby signalled it would also be trialling this revised sanction, explaining that the 20-minute red would be used in its tournaments such as WXV, the Pacific Nations Cup and U20 Championship.

ADVERTISEMENT

Results of this trial are to be evaluated with a recommendation made to World Rugby council in November. In the meantime, Owens has given his view on the 20-minute red after it emerged that French rugby bosses were poised to unveil the law proposals they want to see.

Mathieu Raynal, another retired Test referee, has been involved in formulating ideas such as increasing match day squads from 23 to 25 players but cutting the number of used replacements from eight to six. They also want do away with the 20-minute red card, an aspiration Owens agreed with.

Video Spacer

WATCH: Chasing the Sun Season 2 Trailer | RPTV

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      WATCH: Chasing the Sun Season 2 Trailer | RPTV

      The brilliant Chasing the Sun 2, charting the inspiring story of the Springboks at Rugby World Cup 2023, can be watched on RugbyPass TV

      Watch now

      Writing in his latest weekly walesonline.co.uk column, he stated: “As far as the 20-minute red card idea is concerned, I’m not a fan. As Mathieu has said, I don’t believe it will really solve any of the problems that we have in the game at the moment.

      “If someone on the pitch has committed a red card offence, they should be given a red card that sees them sin-binned for the rest of the game. Simple as that. The problem at the moment is that players are being sent off for things like accidental head collisions, which are not acts of thuggery or recklessness, but simply rugby collisions just accidentally gone wrong.

      Related

      “They should not be seen as red card offences in the first place – so do we need to change the laws instead? I think so, or we certainly need to look at the options, especially upright tackles. Too often, players are still not making the effort to go lower.

      “I’m against the 20 minute red card because if you have been sent off, you have done something reckless that has put another player at great risk, or you have committed an act of thuggery. A red card means you deserve to be off the pitch, so I don’t see why there should be a middle ground.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “In my view, having a 20-minute red card is a cop-out. It’s simply papering over the cracks, when the discussion that really needs to be had is defining exactly what constitutes a red card offence and what doesn’t. That would be far more constructive for the game of rugby.

      “Plus, we didn’t see any real changes in player behaviour when it was trialled this summer, including at The Rugby Championship. There is still a lot of careless, reckless conduct out there, so I don’t know if introducing these new cards has made much of a difference anyway.”

      New tickets for Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 are now available, with prices starting at £10 for adults and £5 for children. Buy now!

      ADVERTISEMENT

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

      France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Lions Share | Episode 4

      Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

      USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

      Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      16 Comments
      C
      CD older/wiser 289 days ago

      I have no problem with red cards if they are administered properly and for the right reason. It (the red card) should be a player only penalty, not a team penalty eg the player at fault gone completely from the field of play, but replaced. That way the game as a spectacle is not ruined. Having Referred Basketball in the past (36yrs) a Disqualified player is replaced, the game as a spectacle is not overly reduced, but the player concerned is gone completely (to the changing rooms or outside the stadium) in disgrace!. More often than not red cards are issued because the tackling player has not dipped enough, if the ball carrier decides to dip a lot lower than the lowering tackler, some of the onus must go ball carrier, he/she knows what he/she is doing going into the tackle. Too often Red cards completely spoil the game. One other point players have numbers, officials should use them, nothing worse than an official who uses the names of some players and not others, it gives the impression of bias. Officials are there to Judicate fairly and evenly.

      N
      NK 287 days ago

      In basketball there are only 5 players on the court, sending off one would be equal to sending off three in rugby. In that regard the argument is not valid. Also, when you leave your teammates a man down, the team becomes vulnerable which is seen as a factor in terms of deterrance. I agree there should be some common sense in the decision making around red cards of course. And around what is a high tackle for that matter.

      G
      George 289 days ago

      Clearly Nigel doesn't understand how the 20 min red card works. He says “I’m against the 20 minute red card because if you have been sent off, you have done something reckless that has put another player at great risk, or you have committed an act of thuggery. A red card means you deserve to be off the pitch, so I don’t see why there should be a middle ground." However for a 20 min red card you are sent off and can't return, just the team can replace you after 20 mins. He also says "Plus, we didn’t see any real changes in player behaviour when it was trialled this summer" Therefore if it makes not real difference to behavior isn't better to have the game 15 on 15 rather than like the world cup where it was 14 on 15 for 60 mins for just getting the tackle wrong and being high, not an act of thuggery as Nigels says red cards should be for

      W
      Werner 289 days ago

      Think his point is that a red card should be a punishment. So if it's not changing behaviour then it's not a very good disincentive which is counter to what WR are trying to do with head contact.


      Maybe the right answer is a new card for accidental head contacts which have the 20mins sin bin? And reserve the red card for deliberate thuggery ie eye gouging, raking and stomping etc

      S
      SadersMan 289 days ago

      Firstly, I think we need to change the two yellow cards = a red card law, esp when reds are meant to be for serious, dangerous, foul play. Maybe the player gets an automatic one test stand down. I'm sure that'll change repeat serial cynical reoffending, behavior.


      And Owens is correct. A red card should be a red card. Unfortunately, under the 20 minute red card law, we have two classes of red card:


      1. An "in real time" red card for serious dangerous foul play where the ref ejects the offender & reduces the team for the remainder of the game (I think Owens is hinting that refs may be copping out by using the upgrade option?), and,


      2. An upgraded red card for serious dangerous foul play where the offender is ejected for the remainder of the game but can be replaced after 20 minutes.


      Why the difference in punishment? Surely for consistency, #1 must have the 20 minute replacement law too. A red card is a red card!! Further pro rata punishment will of course be meted out by the judiciary.


      So, no, I don't think a further law is needed. Just the tweaks I suggest to bring consistency of punishment for a red card, & to punish 2 yellows differently. It's a system definitely worth keeping imo.

      J
      JW 289 days ago

      “If someone on the pitch has committed a red card offence, they should be given a red card that sees them sin-binned for the rest of the game. Simple as that.

      Sorry Owen, it's not that simple. People get sent off for a simple offside these days. You'd think someone like this would actually have something to say? "Simple as that" lol

      J
      JW 289 days ago

      Alright, to his credit he did have something to say after that..

      “As far as the 20-minute red card idea is concerned, I’m not a fan. As Mathieu has said, I don’t believe it will really solve any of the problems that we have in the game at the moment.

      So we might as well start here, which I'm assume was the topic he started with as well. The only reason 20min rec cards were brought in was to make the game fairer, a problem highlighted by their recent frequency.


      A player, and team, should receive the same punishment for a particular foul, no matter what. Red cards (as they were) don't achieve that as the punishment is purely dependent and what stage of the game it is (if you think a punishment has an effect on the frequency of offenses, ask yourself if you've noticed more people committing red card offences towards the ends of game). So a team who receives a red card in the first minute of the game, is overly punished and that is obviously going to be the case for the viewers as well. That is the problem a fixed length red card 'solves'.


      Now, onto the other topics he raises..

      “They should not be seen as red card offences in the first place – so do we need to change the laws instead?

      They're not!!!! They are now seen as 20min red card offences. Here at least, you could still be given a straight red no replacement card on the field for 'thuggery'. This is the law change you're asking for!

      Too often, players are still not making the effort to go lower.

      Going lower is the cause of these problems. There is nothing wrong with upright tackles, they are safe. Shoulder charging and swinging arms are long out of the game Nigel!

      if you have been sent off, you have done something reckless that has put another player at great risk

      No, not necessarily. But in the few cases where they were, that punishment is for the player. Not the team. You can be sent off for receiving a 'team' yellow, this is a case were the rule should directly be rectified however. It's outside this discussion.

      A red card means you deserve to be off the pitch, so I don’t see why there should be a middle ground.

      There is still a lot of careless, reckless conduct out there, so I don’t know if introducing these new cards has made much of a difference anyway.”

      I don't recall any careless or reckless behaviour, not at least in TRC, what is he referring to? What we did just see was the game last week be saved by the 20min RC rule. We had what Nigel is describing as an accidental head collision which saw Argentina receive a read card (must have been very close to yellow). Normally that would have destroyed the game (and it did for that period), but by returning to 15 players it was still able to be a contest, which Opta suggests would normally have had just a 7 point gap between the teams. This is why there is a middle ground (what you have been saying you want!!).

      do we need to change the laws instead?

      Back to his poorly made point. I would suggest bigger off field penalties that are far more involved that a 'tackling' school, and obviously not just for the player, the whole team, especially the coachs, needed to be doing the penance. A definite review to team based yellow cards and how infringement sequences can be better handled is required as well.

      H
      Hellhound 290 days ago

      Too many rules that they make more complicated than is necessary. Rugby is a team sport. Should a player overstep the rules, they should accept the punishment. Accidental or not, head collisions is bad. Red carded players should NOT be replaced. The team must be punished because the players will hold that player accountable. I'd rather say the defence coaches should be fined and there should be repercussions for those coaches. It is their job after all to ensure the right techniques are used and applied. Instead of adding rules, existing laws should be changed to adhere to current problems occuring. There is no ref that knows all the current rules, nevermind the old rules. It's the biggest reason for different applications of the rules by the refs. Everyone blames the refs, but the problem lies with WR and the rulebook. Personally I would rip up the rulebook and send the whole WR board out the door. They are corrupt and if anything, they are incapable of doing their jobs. Rugby is one of the biggest sporting codes in the world and yet it's a small sport. Instead of growing the sport, it has gone backwards over time. WR is a disaster. We need a new World Sports Body to run World Rugby. The current crop of execs is there for prestige, not because they have what it takes.

      J
      JW 289 days ago

      What does any of that got to do with 20min red cards? Why should it be a different penalty each game? That is wrong.


      I'd like the idea if there was a good world body but sadly all I know are run much the same way.

      J
      JWH 290 days ago

      20 minute red card has always been an excellent law down in the SH, only NH teams don't like it because the refs have always favoured them.


      Often, head collision is accidental, and while some is more intentional than others, it should not entirely ruin the match, but simply act as a major advantage to the opposition.


      The real issues with CTE are in the lower amateur and barely professional/provincial leagues, as the technique is obviously worse. WR should be looking to improve the systemic issues at grassroots rather than implement a law which only benefits the highest level (and taking their time with it too). Hasn't this thing been on trial for like 4 years now? Just get on with it

      J
      JW 289 days ago

      Red Cards and head knocks are completely different topics alright. Some people do think that a penalty stops an action from re-occurring (more often), but as we know from the real world, that is not the case. Like you say, rehabilitation actions are what has been needed to change behaviours, not a slap on the behind, or even confinement.

      B
      B 290 days ago

      Player welfare and how they conduct themselves during the session of a rugby match is what WR wants to enforce for the safety of all concerned.


      In comparison to a blatant act of thuggery deserving the full extent of the laws, what peeves me is when players take an accidental hit, milk it by doing a hollywood the other player gets sent off and they suddenly seem fit enough to play on.


      Which in my opinion is an act contravening the conduct of good sportsmanship and should be punished by a yellow card.

      M
      MB 290 days ago

      I agree. However, I don’t think that rugby officialdom have the courage to stand behind the reality that some head contact is accidental, and not preventable.

      Load More Comments

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      P
      PL 46 minutes ago
      Lions Tour Aussie takes: Bigger is better, the stars who failed to fire

      I find it interesting that journalists who have done nothing in rugby comment on selections & coaching like they are experts

      Concussive injury’s will remove insurance cover from the game unless their is strict application of the laws designed to remove MND Parkinson’s and CTE from the game


      Head on head I saw red to Adam Coleman as tackler for Irish while unconscious on a stretcher - concussions occur without twitching on the ground or the wobbly boot - I know I had maybe 20 from rugby


      The officiating of last feet is non existent

      The lack of effective wrap by Lions front rower & that decision had a close relationship with ordure in a toilet

      A head on head tackle red for Coleman not even penalty lead to a try in a phase or 2


      Powys v Evans lead to a £> 2 mill verdict against the ref personally special leveraged to Hiuse of Lords

      Refs will stop reffing with no insurance then no game


      About 5 years ago 4 or 5 French colts died from head hits in elite club games - that led to below sternum law - hamlets honoured in breach not observance

      Last feet non existent - enforcement favour flowing rugby nor lions meat grinder forwards get momentum and puck & drive NZ Vowel noise


      The UK Class Action could be very well be lost WRC will try every dirty trick in case they already used dial a neuros to argue the unarguable is law gossip


      I reffed ref coached & assessed for ruffly 17 seasons


      The application of laws is like a zig zag on speed

      Line out laws not enforced scrums tight pulling loose down one side mirror on other side elbow pointing to ground stretch marks on jersey

      Der moment the refs need to go Soec Savers

      My bet unless they stop lack of intestinal fortitude game management


      Yellow every time head contact or above sternum


      Needs sterner GMGs material impact removed set piece caterpillar remove

      Last feet to last feet + 1 m


      When I reffed I kept them well apart - hated me till they got over yellow and they actually had fun & complemented me post game backs had room and pick and drive had momentum


      As for intentional foul play like tackle in air auto red no replacement 100,000 fine player 250,000 club


      Treble it for international 26 week suspension & it’s disappear over night

      25 were scrum for dissent


      Penalty all this rubbish shots at opponents after error


      All the s.ite would disappear


      The pathetic unsportsmanlike behaviour would lead to standards


      Remember Les Boyd’s penalty re Brohman -if that is the way we treat foul play but while foul play with potential serious injury with a feather duster like we are the game is destined to no insurance following that no refs cause would you risk bankruptcy like Powys v Evans

      1 Go to comments
      S
      Soliloquin 2 hours ago
      Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France

      For Fischer, many people in France are still doubting him - it’s the first time he has a full season (31 games). Before, he was always injured at some point. He’s 27, so not the youngest, and you have a younger Boudehent or Jégou behind.

      His physicality is incredible, but he didn’t prove he’s got hands. He just proved he was able to defend like a beast.

      But you know, even Cros has improved his handling skills lately, so it’s never too late!

      And he will play the Champions Cup with a solid Bayonne side, so let’s see!


      I don’t agree with ‘only Fischer’: Brennan proved he’s a great 4/7 utility player, and Galthié likes those very much (Woki or Flament). He’s 23, playing for Toulouse with high concurrence, so the prospect is good. I rate him higher than Auradou, who had a few games in the 6 Nations.

      For Depoortère, he had a more silent season than the previous one - injured at the worst moment during the Autumn Tests series - but came back strong with a Champions Cup and a solid partnership with Moefana. What could save him would be to start playing as a 12 when Moefana isn’t there, bulking up and become the new Jauzion.

      But he’s 22 and an incredible talent at 13. His height makes me think he had more potential than your fan favorite Costes or the utility player that is Gailleton.


      As for Montagne or Mallez, with the lack of quality in props, they could find a spot!

      Especially Mallez who’s got a good spot to get behind Baille at Toulouse. Neti isn’t the youngest and hasn’t an international level.


      And again, as Ugo Mola said, you never play with your best team.

      So 30-32 player is more of a 38-40, so you need back-ups.

      France knows very well how useful they can be during RWCs.

      237 Go to comments
      S
      Soliloquin 2 hours ago
      Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France

      Hastoy was a good prospect before the 2023 RWC, he was the fly-half who led La Rochelle to the victory in the Champions Cup final in Dublin against Leinster.

      But he made it to the squad only because Ntamack got his ACL.

      He played against Uruguay, which a terribly poor game by the French side, and since then he declined a bit, alongside his club.

      Under the pressure of Reus and West at 10, he regained some credit at the end of the season (among all a drop at the 81st minute of a game).

      He’s quite good everywhere, but not outstanding.

      He doesn’t have the nerves, the defense and the tactical brain of Ntamack, the leadership and the creativity of Ramos or the exceptional attacking skills of Jalibert.


      I really hope that:

      -Ntamack will get his knee back. The surgery went well. He wasn’t the most elusive player in the world, but he was capable of amazing rushes like the one against NZ in 2021 or the Brennus-winning try in 2023.

      -Jalibert will continue to improve his defense. He started working hard since March (after his defensive disaster against England) with a XIII specialist, and I’ve seen great moments, especially against Ntamack in the SF of the Champions Cup. It’s never too late. And it would be a great signal for Galthié.

      -Hastoy will build up his partnership with Le Garrec, that La Rochelle will start a new phase with them and Niniashvili, Alldritt, Atonio, Boudehent, Jegou, Bosmorin, Bourgarit, Nowell, Wardi, Daunivucu, Kaddouri, Pacôme…

      237 Go to comments
      LONG READ
      LONG READ The RugbyPass team of the World Rugby U20 Championship The RugbyPass team of the World Rugby U20 Championship