Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

No McKenzie, Weber or Cane in Chiefs team to play Rebels

(Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

The Chiefs will turn to a new-look halves combination and the high-flying Shaun Stevenson on Saturday when they take on the Rebels without a number of their All Blacks stars.

ADVERTISEMENT

After starting their season with three big victories, Super Rugby veterans Damian McKenzie, Brad Weber and Brodie Retallick have proven themselves to be among the form players of the competition.

Playmaker Damian McKenzie was especially impressive across the opening three rounds of the campaign, having returned to the Chiefs following a sabbatical in Japan.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But the ladder-leaders will look to extend their unbeaten streak to four games without some of their key players when they take the field at FMG Stadium.

Co-captains Brad Weber and Sam Cane have not been named in this weeks team, and neither has McKenzie or All Blacks centurion Brodie Retallick.

The Chiefs have made some significant changes ahead of their clash with the Rebels in Hamilton. In total, Chiefs coach Clayton McMillan has made eight changes to his starting XV.

All Black Samisoni Taukei’aho has been relegated to the bench, with Tyrone Thompson set to start in the No. 2 jumper.

ADVERTISEMENT

Along with Retallick, Tupou Vaa’i has also been left out of the team – with McMillian turning to a new-look second row combination. For the first time this season, Retallick and Vaa’i won’t start for the Chiefs.

Naitoa Ah Kuoi and Manaaki Selby-Rickit have been given the nod to start in their place at FMG Stadium.

Related

Loose forward Luke Jacobson will captain the side from the openside flank, and will pack alongside Samipeni Finau and Pita Gus Sowakula in the backrow.

But the biggest shock – and potentially the biggest risk – is the new-look combination in the halves.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rising star Cortez Ratima will start at halfback, and will partner Bryn Gatland who is set to run out in the No. 10 jersey.

The rest of the backline remains unchanged following last weeks 28-7 win over the Highlanders.

But the Chiefs certainly pack a punch with their bench this week, having named capped All Blacks Taukei’aho, Te Toiroa Tahuriorangi and Josh Ioane.

The match against the Melbourne Rebels is set to get underway at 4:35pm NZT at FMG Stadium, Hamilton.

 

Chiefs to take on the Rebels

  1. Aidan Ross
  2. Tyrone Thompson
  3. John Ryan
  4. Naitoa Ah Kuoi
  5. Manaaki Selby-Rickit
  6. Samipeni Finau
  7. Luke Jacobson (c)
  8. Pita Gus Sowakula
  9. Cortez Ratima
  10. Bryn Gatland
  11. Etene Nanai-Seturo
  12. Rameka Poihipi
  13. Alex Nankivell
  14. Emoni Narawa
  15. Shaun Stevenson

 

Replacements:

  1. Samisoni Taukei’aho
  2. Ollie Norris
  3. George Dyer
  4. Laghlan McWhannell
  5. Kaylum Boshier
  6. Te Toiroa Tahuriorangi
  7. Josh Ioane
  8. Peniasi Malimali
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search