Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'No mitigation can be applied': Albert Tuisue cops yet another ban

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Albert Tuisue has been banned for the second time in recent months, the Fijian back-rower following up his Test duty red card in November with a two-game ban after the receipt of three Gallagher Premiership yellow cards this season while playing for Gloucester.

ADVERTISEMENT

The forward was banned for four matches after he was red-carded by French referee Mathieu Raynal following his second-half November 12 collision with Joey Carbery in Dublin. That disciplinary hearing summary reported that “the player denied he had committed an act of foul play worthy of a red card, but admitted that the act was worthy of at most a yellow card”.

Now, a sequence of yellow cards in the English league has come to haunt Tuisue as he will be absent for the upcoming Gloucester games versus Saracens in the Premiership this Friday and the following weekend’s Heineken Champions Cup game against Leinster.

Video Spacer

Being Barbarians – Rugby Documentary

Our new rugby documentary follows Scott Robertson and Ronan O’Gara in a brand new saga following the Barbarians rugby team, one of the most famous sides in the world. In this clash, they take on New Zealand XV.

Video Spacer

Being Barbarians – Rugby Documentary

Our new rugby documentary follows Scott Robertson and Ronan O’Gara in a brand new saga following the Barbarians rugby team, one of the most famous sides in the world. In this clash, they take on New Zealand XV.

An RFU statement read: “The case of Albert Tuisue, Gloucester Rugby, was heard on Wednesday, January 4, by a single judicial officer, Sam Hillas. Tuisue has received three foul play yellow cards during the course of the current season, most recently on December 31 in the game against London Irish. He received a two-week ban.”

The written verdict issued by the RFU detailed the referee reports on the three yellow cards that Tuisue picked up with Gloucester, the first coming in the October 8 game versus Bath. “Gloucester No8 made no attempt to wrap his arms and hit Bath No6 without the ball. I saw the incident live but in dialogue with the TMO as play was continuing, we deemed the incident to meet the threshold for a yellow card.”

Related

It was October 28 versus Exeter when Tuisue picked up his second Gloucester card. “Exeter formed a maul just inside Gloucester 22. The maul traveled at pace to the five-metre line where it was deliberately collapsed by Gloucester 20. Yellow card issued.”

Regarding last weekend’s third yellow for Gloucester, the referee’s report on Tuisue commented: “At a break in play the TMO brought an incident of foul play to my attention. Once on the screen, I observed that Gloucester No20 had made head contact with his shoulder to the head of London Irish No13.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He was at fault due to being upright. Whilst there was head contact, the majority of the force was through the chest and therefore I observed that the tackle wasn’t of high danger. A yellow card was issued as per the head contact protocol.”

In the subsequent summary, judicial officer Hillas said: “No mitigation can be applied to reduce the entry point of one week. The player has two previous red cards on his record. The first was from September 2019 (RFU) which resulted in a three-week ban for dangerous tackling.

“The second red was in November 2022 (WR) which was also for a dangerous tackle and resulted in a four-week suspension (following which he completed the WR coaching intervention programme). As a result of the player’s record, one week was added to the entry point as an aggravating feature. The final sanction to be applied is two weeks.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search