Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'No one wants another London Welsh scenario': Richards on Ealing promotion

Dean Richards (Getty Images)

Dean Richards, who guided Harlequins and Newcastle to promotion back into the Gallagher Premiership, believes Championship winners Ealing Trailfinders must satisfy the entry criteria to be allowed into the top flight to ensure English rugby never suffers another London Welsh debacle.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Welsh were unprepared on and off the pitch for the demands of the Premiership, lost all 18 matches, were relegated in 2015 and liquidators were appointed in December 2016. A month later it was announced that Welsh had been removed from the Championship and their results expunged. The professional section of the club disappeared forcing the Welsh to revert to an amateur operation which has shown real battling qualities to make up for lost ground as they work their way back up the English ladder.

Trailfinders have appealed against the ruling that they do not satisfy the entry criteria to become the 14th team in the Premiership next season and a decision is expected by the end of the month. Simon Orange, co-owner of Sale Sharks, has backed the Trailfinders bid on social media saying: “We should do everything we can to allow them to come up. If that means change the rules or give them time to meet the minimum standards then so be it!!!”

Video Spacer

Freddie Burns & Max Lahiff – Dropped at Nandos, Loyalty & England’s next head coach | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 28

Video Spacer

Freddie Burns & Max Lahiff – Dropped at Nandos, Loyalty & England’s next head coach | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 28

The minimum standards criteria required by the Rugby Football Union includes that a promoted club’s stadium must hold a minimum of 10,001 fans. In their statement the RFU said: “Ealing Trailfinders does not currently have a licensed capacity, but the ground holds approximately 5,000 with 2,115 seats.”

Richards praised Trailfinders Championship title success but takes a pragmatic view and told RugbyPass; “Winning the Championship is not as straight forward as people think. It is a tough call to finish top and you have to be a good team but there are reasons why there are minimum criteria (for promotion).

“It is not just based around stadia and it is about academies and everything else and once those are all satisfied I would be more than happy for Ealing to go up into the Premiership. I believe the criteria are important and no one wants another London Welsh scenario where a team comes up and then the next season defaults and is nowhere to be seen.

Related

“You need to have the right infrastructure in place, an academy programme as well as a first team. You also have to be secure in the knowledge the club is going to be there for a little longer than just a season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“London Welsh didn’t have a squad or a structure in place and weren’t financially strong enough to stay up losing every game. They had a huge history in the game and the effect of throwing everything into that one season meant it broke the club.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
P
Patrick 991 days ago

Seems Dean is still not so keen on fair competition...

S
Simon 991 days ago

Come on Dean! Please do your research - we have an amazing academy at Ealing Trailfinders which also includes a relationship with Brunel University. To compare our set up and facilities with London Welsh is quite bizarre...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search