Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Not a shock’: Commentator on All Blacks’ ‘inevitable’ coaching split

The All Blacks coach team (L-R) Jason Ryan, Jason Holland, Scott Robertson, Scott Hansen and Leon MacDonald pose for a photo during the New Zealand All Blacks International Test Squad Announcement at Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre on June 24, 2024 in Christchurch, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

New Zealand rugby commentator Tony Johnson believes it was “inevitable” and “not a shock” to see the All Blacks make a significant change to their coaching staff. Before two Tests against the Springboks, assistant coach Leon MacDonald has stepped down.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier this week, New Zealand Rugby revealed that head coach Scott Robertson and MacDonald had “some honest conversations” before agreeing to part ways. This headline-grabbing change comes just five Tests into the ‘Razor’ coaching era.

In April of last year, NZR announced that MacDonald would leave the Blues to join the All Blacks as their attack coach. But the 46-year-old wasn’t the only one stepping up with the Robertson appointing multiple coaches into various roles.

Scott Hansen, Jason Holland and Jason Ryan were confirmed as the other three assistant coaches, while Tamati Ellison and Wayne Smith also had ‘coach’ in their new titles. There were a lot of chefs in the kitchen under Robertson and eventually, “Something’s got to give.”

Hansen and Ellison will take on more responsibilities with MacDonald leaving the All Blacks. But the departure of the former Blues head coach has certainly raised eyebrows around the rugby world considering New Zealand only played their first Test of the year on July 6.

“I suppose people will be shocked by it because you don’t see this happen very often, but in a way, perhaps not a shock,” Tony Johnson said on SENZ’s Afternoons With Staffy.

“I was at a briefing early on this year where Scott Robertson outlined his strategic approach or the format that he was going to take with his coaching and that was going to involve a group of coaches, each with a distinct portfolio or a part of the team that they had to look after.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I remember thinking at the time, ‘Boy, this is quite radical.’ With him, Razor, at the top… you almost got the feeling, was it more like an English football manager than a hands-on coach?

“Obviously, in the past, Graham Henry, Steve Hansen and Wayne Smith, the best coaching setup we’ve ever had in certainly the professional era since we’ve started having multiple coaches, they had multiple roles but they were clearly defined and it was only three of them.

“Those three guys, they covered the whole range of coaching areas.

Related

“The talk all along, and not unsurprisingly, has been it’s all got a bit convoluted – eight voices… in theory it might be okay, it might be radical. But the reality appears to be that there’s simply too many voices, too much information.

ADVERTISEMENT

“One coach, Jason Ryan, appears to  have a reasonably broad range of responsibilities. If that happens then where’s the balance? You’ve got the danger of others tripping over each other.”

In MacDonald’s final Test on August 17, the All Blacks returned to winning ways in style. New Zealand had been beaten by Argentina 38-30 the week before in Wellington but bounced back with a 32-point annihilation of the same foe at Eden Park.

The All Blacks have only lost one of five Tests under ‘Razor’ Robertson and co. this year but it’s fair to say most of their performances haven’t been convincing. They’ve looked like an All Blacks team who are trying to find their identity under a new coaching group.

But that 42-10 win over Los Pumas was a step in the right direction. It doesn’t get any easier for the All Blacks, though, who are preparing to take on the two-time defending Rugby World Cup champion Springboks on their home deck in Johannesburg and Cape Town.

“I think it was quite notable that the reason why they played so much better against the Pumas in the second Test was that everything got simplified and maybe the weather forced that – that they had to take a more simplified approach,” Johnson continued.

“Maybe this might be part of a process that this whole coaching setup has to be simplified a little bit.

“It’s not great for it to happen and Leon MacDonald is a guy I’ve known for a long time, great regard for him, and it’s a bit sad to see this happen, but you’d have to think that it was inevitable if you put so many different people, so many different voices, something’s got to give.

“The only thing that’s probably good about it is, okay, they’ve confronted it now rather than let it burn on, fester away and drag on… they haven’t minced their words in the way that it’s come out.

“I think overall, it’s just clear evidence that New Zealand Rugby allowed too much leeway in how the coaching staff were picked, how many of them were picked, and how it was going to run because quite clearly there have been some issues there.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
S
SM 121 days ago

Hopefully we stop playing Reiko at 13 now.

S
SadersMan 122 days ago

Nothing to do with "number" of voices, rather difference of philosophy. There's only room for one boss.


Something similar happened when Rangi resigned after one season 2017 as Razor's Crusaders' backs assistant, supposedly for family reasons. Then we get the news halfway through 2018 that he's to be the new Blues Head Coach in 2019.


At least they gave it another go & when still not clicking after prolonged honest review, sorted this out early in this new ABs era. Well done.

T
Toaster 123 days ago

Yeah ok too many voices and all that but why specifically him?

Still none the wiser

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 8 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Wallace Sititi: 'No, not in a million years... just crazy to say' Wallace Sititi: 'No, not in a million years... just crazy to say'
Search