Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Not all of it has been doom and gloom': Why Lolesio must start

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

Despite hints from head coach Dave Rennie that veteran playmaker Quade Cooper could make his long-awaited return to the test arena against the All Blacks next weekend, the Kiwi view is that the Wallabies should stick with Noah Lolesio.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking on this week’s Aotearoa Rugby Pod, former Blues hooker James Parsons tabled two potential options at Rennie’s disposal that involve either No 10 – use Cooper with a young midfield, or use Lolesio with experienced No 12 Samu Kerevi.

“There’s another way of looking at it, in that Quade could potentially line up in that 10 jersey as the experienced back to connect with [Hunter] Paisami and [Len] Ikitau at 12 and 13,” Parsons mulled.

Video Spacer

Should Quade Cooper start for the Wallabies? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Should Quade Cooper start for the Wallabies? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

“Or you keep Lolesio there because he’s your future and you’re working towards 2023, and you might as well keep backing him.

“To be honest, some of his game has been top class, a couple of grubbers in behind that set-up tries. There’s been a few intercepts but not all of it has been doom and gloom.”

Parsons thought Lolesio, the young Brumbies No 10, has shown enough to keep his starting spot, with his nice lead-up work helping creating multiple Wallabies tries, while also using his boot to set-up a couple more over the two All Blacks tests.

Although the Wallabies tried Matt To’omua in the second test, the hard-running Kerevi could be the right option to play alongside Lolesio.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think Noah’s shown enough to keep his 10 jersey. They obviously put To’omua there in that second test to give a bit of experience, but we know that Samu Kerevi is coming back,” Parsons said.

“If you can put someone of his ability outside Noah, it will really allow them to open up and take the pressure off the likes of Hunter Paisami.”

If Kerevi is not ready to start the test, Parsons suggested playing a young midfield featuring Ikitau, the 22-year-old centre who started the first test against the All Blacks.

Parsons said he was impressed by the defensive efforts of both Ikitau and Paisami, who is unavailable for this week’s clash due to the birth of his child, in the 33-25 defeat to the Kiwis earlier this month.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We saw the defensive pressure those two young men put the All Blacks under in that first test at Eden Park, but also sticks to way Dave Rennie builds his squads. He really does back his youth,” Parsons said.

“I really like Ikitau, and I know he’s dropped back to the bench, I thought he was great with his opportunities.

“He [Cooper] certainly has a place to play, whether be an opportunity to start or an opportunity off the bench, because we know the style of coach Dave Rennie is. If you are nailing it at training, putting pressure on, he will reward you.”

Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall also pencilled in a bench role for Cooper as he argued more time invested into Lolesio will be beneficial with his overall development.

Hall added that if the game hasn’t panned out the way the Wallabies want, the experience of Cooper can then be brought into the game.

“I think the bench role would be great for Quade,” the Maori All Blacks star said.

“We’ve talked a lot about Lolesio, and I think anytime you are a 10, he’s had a few rocky performances just because of how great the All Blacks have been playing, especially defending, it’s been tough.

“But, I think the more time you can get on him, being able to continue his growth around controlling the team and getting the attack shapes right, growing as a leader within that squad, I think they will continue to keep playing him.

“If it doesn’t go how you want to in the first 50 minutes of the test match, then you’ve got a guy like Quade Cooper that you can bring on.

“You know what you are going to get with Quade, so I think sticking with Lolesio and having the guys around him that he’s played with is really important going forward.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search