Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

NRL investigate Robinson's ref comments

Roosters Men's coach Trent Robinson chats with Jessica Sergis during the Sydney Roosters Grand Final Captain's Run training session at Moreton Daily Stadium on April 09, 2022 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Sydney Roosters coach Trent Robinson has taken aim at the refereeing of his side’s loss to Penrith and now faces scrutiny from the NRL.

ADVERTISEMENT

The NRL plans to investigate comments directed at match officials by Sydney Roosters coach Trent Robinson.

The Roosters kept pace with the reigning premiers on Friday night but couldn’t close the game out after earning only 28 per cent of the territory and finding themselves on the wrong end of an 8-3 penalty count.

Related

After the 26-18 loss at BlueBet Stadium, Robinson lamented a series of “big decisions” from referee Gerard Sutton that he believed cost his side.

Robinson questioned Sutton’s decision to sin bin Angus Crichton after the play had moved past his professional foul and was also critical of a dangerous tackle penalty blown against Sam Verrills that put Penrith in position to score.

“(The penalty against Verrills) was just a horrible decision,” Robinson said.

“We shouldn’t have let a try in on the end of it but there were so many poor decisions tonight.

“The sin-binning … we’re not playing rugby union. You either stop the game and send him to the bin or you don’t.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’re big decisions that you can’t get wrong.”

Robinson appeared to suggest Sutton chose not to award penalties to the Roosters that he would have paid the Panthers.

“It wasn’t a good enough performance from him,” he said.

“It wasn’t going to happen in Roosters’ colours. That’s not bias, that’s a fact, that you’re not going to get those opportunities.

“Obviously there were issues there with our team and not the other team.”

In August last year, the NRL fined Robinson $20,000 for comments made about the officiating of the Roosters’ loss to South Sydney.

On that occasion, Robinson labelled the match officials’ performance “laughable”, triggering a $10,000 suspended fine imposed earlier in the year for another post-match critique.  

ADVERTISEMENT

The NRL told AAP on Saturday that Robinson’s most recent comments would be reviewed next week, but there was no time frame on finalising its investigation.

Captain James Tedesco consulted with Sutton throughout the loss but said there “wasn’t much explanation” for the skewed penalty count.

Related

“It was frustrating. It felt like we were defending our line so well and then we would just get a penalty against us,” he said.

Panthers coach Ivan Cleary was brief when asked whether he agreed with Robinson’s assessment of the refereeing.

“I didn’t see it like that,” he said.

Victor Radley left the field for a head injury assessment late in his first game back from an ankle injury but Robinson said his lock forward would not face more time on the sidelines.

“He didn’t even know why (he was taken off),” Robinson said.

“He’s fine.”

The Roosters have the bye in round 17 but Robinson said playmaker Luke Keary would make his return from a head knock the following week.

“That’s the plan, that’s what he’s working towards,” Robinson said.

“He’s back on some of his progressions to get towards that.”

Keary suffered five concussions between 2018 and 2019 so the Roosters are managing his return with extra care.

By: Jasper Bruce, AAP

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes
Search