Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

NSW Blues player ratings vs Queensland | State of Origin II

(Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Brad Fittler’s Blues levelled the series at Optus Stadium in Perth with a resounding 44-12 win after a second half blitz put the Maroons away, bringing back memories of the 2019 clash between the two sides at the same stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues had to play catch up when Queensland scored the first try of the game but they hit back quickly through debutant Matt Burton latching onto a smart grubber kick from Nathan Clearly.

Just two points separated the side at halftime with the Blues leading 14-12 before a landslide of tries, including two to halfback Nathan Cleary, put the Blues result beyond doubt.

Here’s how the NSW Blues rated in Perth in Origin II:

1 James Tedesco – 8

A strong all-round game saw him run for 191m and bust 10 tackles, his work in the backfield helping his side take over late in the piece.

2 Brian To’o – 9

Crucial in the territory game, chewing through a whopping 228 metres and busting seven tackles, while an early try-saving hit helped set the tone for the Blues.

3 Matt Burton – 8.5

Brilliant Origin debut including a try and a smart assist for To’o’s try with an spectacular catch pass, while he unleashed bombs via the foot that troubled the Queensland backs and added another key element to the Blues’ game.

4 Stephen Crichton – 5

ADVERTISEMENT

Struggled to get involved and was rarely threatening deep in attack, potentially making him vulnerable to be dropped ahead of the series decider.

5 Daniel Tupou – 9

Herculean effort running the ball in the back field for 187m with eight tackle busts, his intense effort well and truly earning his second-half try.

6 Jarome Luai – 7

Shook off a poor first half that included a loose carry, a missed tackle that led to a Queensland try and giving away a cheap penalty that led to another with a superb solo try in the second.

7 Nathan Cleary – 10

His masterpiece included a genius kick to assist the Blues’ first try and his exceptional vision made another with a lofted pass for Tupou to score in the corner. His complete kicking game was on show throughout, while he capped things off with two brilliant running tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

8 Payne Haas – 6

Led a hot forward-pack effort early with 105m, running with vigour as usual as he set the tone for the night.

Related

9 Api Korisau – 5

Dummy-half work helped free up his teammates to shine, but didn’t do much outside of that.

10 Jake Trbojevic – 7

Was busy early on his return to the side, most importantly in defence with 27 tackles, where his elite energy led a much-improved effort from the Blues.

11 Cameron Murray – 7

Suffered a huge shot across the chin and ear and left for an HIA, but returned for 78m running and delivered some big shots defensively in a 25-tackle showing.

12 Liam Martin – 6

Had some effort plays including a huge kick chase as pressure mounted, although he did miss three tackles.

13 Isaah Yeo – 8.5

Stellar on both sides of the ball, defensively perfect making 29 tackles without missing one while he also ran for 92.

14 Damian Cook – 5

Injected in the shadows of halftime and his energy helped the Blues lift when they needed to, although he lacked any real individual moments.

15 Angus Crichton – 6.5

Took a stray boot to the chin on 15 minutes but returned to bring heat in the middle and scored the easiest of tries late in the piece.

16 Junior Paulo – 7.5

Brought immediate energy off the bench with some bruising runs, producing a particularly angry 129m that provided the energy NSW needed.

17 Siosifa Talakai – 5

Came on with 17 minutes to play and made a couple of runs without any highlights.

-Alex Mitchell/AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 10 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes
Search