Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

NZR will go to extraordinary lengths to avoid admitting wrong

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

We asked New Zealand Rugby (NZR) to lead and they’ve led.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whether the decision to retain Ian Foster as All Blacks head coach amounts to the blind leading the blind remains to be seen.

I’ve never been in favour of Foster ascending to that role and nothing I’ve seen since comes remotely close to convincing me he deserved to stay there.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

He definitely should have gone down with the ship when the careers of assistants John Plumtree and Brad Mooar were effectively sunk. They were his blokes, he recruited them, he argued for their retention and yet he escaped responsibility when the pair were finally jettisoned after the 2-1 series loss to Ireland.

That’s not to say Plumtree and Mooar didn’t deserve to go or that the All Blacks’ overall coaching staff isn’t better now. But we cannot pretend that the team’s performances and results while Mooar and Plumtree were around weren’t Foster’s fault.

And so to yesterday and NZR’s fulsome praise of Foster and the addition of Joe Schmidt to his staff.

The Schmidt bit is clearly a good outcome. He is undoubtedly one of the game’s great coaches and his influence should ensure the All Blacks’ competitiveness.

ADVERTISEMENT

But, again, it is a recognition of Foster’s failings. It is an acknowledgement that he isn’t capable of actually coaching the team or co-ordinating a campaign himself.

New Zealand Rugby can state their absolute confidence in Foster till the cows come home, but coercing Schmidt – a man most people accept didn’t want a full-time or travelling coaching role anymore – to join the team suggests otherwise.

I know people are tired of this. I know people are certainly sick of me writing about it.

They want us all to get behind the team and to support Ian Foster. They believe Sunday’s (NZ time) win over South Africa to be a vindication of the man and his methods and they want us all to move on.

It’s funny, though, isn’t it? All the media men charged with travelling with the All Blacks and covering their day-to-day business thought Foster was a goner.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

They all wrote his rugby obituary and all told us Scott Robertson was set to assume the position. All of them.

People don’t invent those stories and they sure as eggs don’t write them to be popular with the people they’re covering. They wrote those stories because everything they’d seen and heard told them Foster’s tenure would end at Ellis Park.

They had an obligation to the truth and, as awkward as it made touring life for them, they lived up to it.

And now NZR chairman Stewart Mitchell and chief executive Mark Robinson want to sit there, as they did in Auckland yesterday, and tell us Foster was never under pressure and the team are poised for world domination? Please.

That’s what sticks in the craw. That belief that we can be treated as fools, as we have ever since the “search’’ for Steve Hansen’s successor began.

Let’s be clear, getting Joe Schmidt and Jason Ryan in to hold Foster’s hand and/or do his job for him is a good result. A great result, actually.

The All Blacks still have playing personnel issues, as evidenced by the results leading up to Ellis Park, but at least coaches are now in place who’ll give them a better chance of performing to their potential.

Those players must not want Scott Robertson, by the way.

Never mind that, before Ellis Park, the only game the All Blacks won in the preceding half-dozen was when Foster was out with Covid. These blokes appeared pretty hellbent on continuing to have Foster around.

Contract or not, I’m surprised Robertson is still here.

I know there was a suggestion he was a bit presumptuous and unpatriotic when he told a podcast he’d like to win a world cup with a country other than New Zealand. Well, another nation is clearly his best bet.

He might not have wanted the All Blacks job now. Foster might owe his retention to the fact that no-one else would do it instead.

But whatever the specifics, Robertson would benefit from being elsewhere. From testing his methods on different athletes with different mindsets.

It was telling that Sam Whitelock was among those senior All Blacks to endorse Foster. Now Whitelock won’t be around forever but, if he’s anything to go by, Robertson’s eventual All Blacks prospects might be improved by inheriting a playing group who haven’t been coached by him before.

So go overseas. Get away from the endless speculation that you should have or will get the All Blacks job and start winning titles with someone else.

If these past few weeks have told us anything, it’s that NZR will go to extraordinary lengths – and hire and fire any number of assistants – to avoid admitting they appointed the wrong head coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
T
Tristan 853 days ago

Ian Foster applied to be All Black coach. I don't believe that anyone is knocking him as a person, no one is dredging up 10 year old tweets or ex-girlfriends. His job performance and aptitude for the position is being criticised. That goes with the territory I'm afraid. His team is not playing well and not looking like they have the right systems in place. The assistant coaches Foster chose did not perform well, as boss he should also carry the can for that. How many baby sitters does he need? He is meant to be HEAD coach.

P
Peter 854 days ago

I would think Sir Graham Henry would have a lot more knowledge about the game than your journalist. Get real and back the team as a whole. The coaching staff are only part of the mix. Armchair critics with no skin in the game are not credible.

f
flyinginsectshrimp 854 days ago

It must be that cold day in hell – I agree with Hamish Bidwell 😄

I shared this perspective on a Reddit thread a few days ago, when Mooar and Plumtree's supposedly poor reviews in late-2021 were discussed:

"Were they sacrificial lambs? Were they products of Ian Foster's environment? Plumtree was good enough to be a Hurricanes head coach, and Mooar to be recruited by Scarlets. Plenty of players had worked with both at Super level. Feek is respected for his work with Ireland. We'll never know if they were fired based on performance because we don't know their KPIs."

This is just an observation. I don't support the pile-on of Ian Foster as a person – he deserves respect like any one of us.

W
Willie 854 days ago

My read is the players have ruled. Looking forward to them backing up.
Any objective analysis of Ellis Pk will mainly credit the win to the ABs being on the good end of a number of 50:50 ref calls and the Springboks fielding a team no one can justify.
Fortunately Aust is down to its 3rd XV otherwise the Bledisloe would be travelling overseas.

N
Nick 854 days ago

Must say that the RU treats the opinion of its fan base with total contempt.

As for the players getting involved, that can only undermine the authority of their coach. Foster is now beholden to what those players want.

I hope Razor gets left out of the conversation, it's not about his performance, it's about Foster and the Boards lack of performance.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search