Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Andy Goode lays the blame for Tigers' decline, and it's not Matt O'Connor

Matt O'Connor and (inset_ Andy Goode

Leicester find themselves down in ninth place in the Premiership at the start of 2018 and the only way is up but their lowly position isn’t down to the coaching, according to former fly half Andy Goode.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Tigers are on their worst run of form for over half a century since 1965 after losing six straight games in all competitions since November.

They are now just one place above their fierce East Midlands rivals Northampton, who sacked Jim Mallinder last month after their poor run of form showed no signs of abating, but Goode says coaching is not the issue at Welford Road.

“They’ve made it into the top four for the last 13 years but I don’t think the blame lies with Matt O’Connor. He only came in at the back end of last season and recruitment as a process is done early,” he said on The Rugby Pod.

“Exeter, Saracens, Wasps and the top clubs do their recruitment three years in advance and they target where they want to improve and what they need. Leicester have got their recruitment massively wrong.”

Goode, who won five Premiership titles and two European Cups with Leicester, says the club have got it wrong in the transfer market and not invested in the back row and second row, where the squad needed the most improvement.

“I think they’ve got their recruitment in the forwards wrong massively,” he said.

“Ellis Genge has bags of potential, Tom Youngs and Tatafu Polota-Nau are both good players and Dan Cole is England’s tighthead prop but behind that the back five forwards are nothing like what you would expect Leicester’s back five of the scrum to be like when you look at the foundations that the club is built on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Goode also highlighted the big money summer signing of England fly half George Ford as a potential error of judgement, saying that the balance of the squad was better last season and that the money could have been better used elsewhere.

“George Ford is England’s number 10 at times but I still think that the sum of the parts last year with Owen Williams and Freddie Burns as the two fly halves, and them never being away on international duty, is greater than the sum of the Ford brothers with Joe as the back up,” said Goode, speaking on The Rugby Pod.

“I don’t think the Toomua/Ford axis works at the minute. Toomua is a great player but I don’t think he helps Ford’s natural game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“George Ford, for me, was a panic signing. It was a statement signing to say ‘look what we can do’ and actually you’re probably better off keeping Freddie Burns and spending that £600,000 on three quality forwards in the back five that they don’t have.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat
Search