Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Olympic Sevens rugby final match up confirmed as Blitzbokke stumble

Selesitino Ravutaumada

The final for the 2024 Olympic rugby sevens has been confirmed with hosts France set to face defending champions Fiji.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trailing following the opening half as South Africa scored through Tristan Leyds, France called upon Antoine Dupont early in the second half. This change would prove to be the catalyst for a dominant showing from the hosts, who scored three tries through Rayan Rebbadj (2) and Jordan Sepho to secure a 19 – 7 win.

In semi-final two, Fiji overcame a tight first half to secure a comfortable 31 – 7 victory over Australia.

Deadlocked at 7 – 7 at halftime, the match looked set to go down to the wire, but as they have done all tournament, the defending champions burst into life. Taking the lead inside one minute into the second half through Losefo Baleiwairiki, the Fijians were firmly in the ascendancy.

Scoring two more converted tries through Kaminieli Rasaku and Selesitino Ravutaumada to go with a penalty from Terio Veilawa Tamani, Fiji romped to third successive Olympic final.

Outside of the semi-finals, a late Terry Kennedy try secured Ireland’s 17 – 14 win over the USA, booking their place in the fifth-place play-off.

Facing Ireland in the 5th place play-off will be New Zealand, who took the spoils when the two sides met in the final match of Pool A. Securing their place in the 5th place final, New Zealand overcame Argentina when Andrew Knewstubb scored four minutes into overtime.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kicking off the final series this afternoon, Uruguay will face Japan in the 11th-place play-off at 15.30, followed by the 10th-place play-off between Samoa and Kenya.

The bronze medal-deciding match between South Africa and Australia will begin tonight at 18.00 local time before France and Fiji conclude the tournament in the gold medal final at 18.45 local time.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
R
Richard 146 days ago

The French crowd so disrespectful. Goes against the spirit of the sport

W
WR 146 days ago

Brave effort Blitz Boks, but went exactly like I suspected. Wasn't good enough in the past couple of seasons. Since coach Neil Powell left, you went from champs to very average. Truth be told, a new coach needed A.S.A.P. SARU screwed up. It’s Olympics, the country’s pride is on the line. Was it the best team that could go to the Olympics? No. We have star Bok players, like Cheslin Kolbe, Kurt-Lee Arendse, Canan Moodie and others that played sevens before, who came from that scene. They should have been invited to join the sevens this year, same as Dupoint of France. Would the results have been different? Definitely. SARU should have invited them, paid the club's whatever release fees necessary to get those players. In saying all this, I also have to be fair. There is no guarantee the result of the semi would have been different, and even if you made it to the final, the Fijians is the masters of this sevens game scene. We might have lost anyway. These players are the ones who played hard and worked hard for this opportunity to be in the Olympics. They deserve to be there. Tough luck boys, hope you get the bronze, and even if you don't, you can hold your heads high!💯

B
Bull Shark 146 days ago

Du Pont looks so at home in sevens. He should stay there.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster Racing 92 exit rumours wide of the mark Stuart Lancaster Racing 92 exit rumours wide of the mark
Search