Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

One distinct aspect of Welsh play fed into England picking Nowell

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Jack Nowell lasted only 16 minutes in his first England start in 28 months in the February 13 win over Italy, but he still did enough in that brief cameo to justify getting chosen again to wear the No11 jersey when Wales visit Twickenham this Saturday. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Exeter winger took an early knock to his head at the Stadio Olimpico in the Guinness Six Nations game and the decision by referee Damon Murphy to briefly allow him to play on before he was taken away for a head injury assessment was one of the main talking points to emerge from that match. 

Nowell spent last week back in England camp, chosen as part of the 25-strong squad named by Jones for the fallow week training gathering in London. This was where he began his progress through the return to play protocols and his recovery has now resulted in his selection to face the Welsh in this weekend’s game. 

Video Spacer

Six Nations preview with Exeter’s Sam Skinner | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 22

Video Spacer

Six Nations preview with Exeter’s Sam Skinner | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 22

It represents a huge vote of confidence in Nowell, who was only sent on an 80th-minute replacement for the opening round defeat to Scotland as Jones has chosen Joe Marchant and Max Malins to start that match on the wings. 

Marchant was switched into midfield in Rome to accommodate the inclusion of Nowell, but the omission on Tuesday evening of the Harlequins player from the reduced 25-man England squad paved the way for Jones to give Nowell his backing for the second successive match. Marchant, though, was dramatically recalled to the squad on Thursday night when chosen No12 Manu Tuilagi was ruled out injured and that midfield vacancy won’t be filled until pre-game Saturday.     

“Jack has had good training,” assured Jones when asked why he was encouraged to go with Nowell in what is a make-or-break game for England’s title chances. “We picked him because he was in good form. We want that work rate type winger which is Jack. He started the game well against Italy and unfortunately because of circumstances missed the rest of the game, but he has come back, trained really well and he will give us something a bit different. And particularly he is a very physical winger and we know the Welsh backs are particularly physical.”

Charlie Ewels was another player promoted from the Murrayfield bench to start at Stadio Olimpico who has now held onto his starting berth against the Welsh as Jones elected to drop Nick Isiekwe to the bench to accommodate the return of skipper Courtney Lawes, who starts at No6 with Maro Itoje joining Ewels in the second row.   

ADVERTISEMENT

“Good work rate,” said Jones when asked for his thinking regarding keeping Ewels as a starter. “He has been really working on his defensive part of the game, been doing a lot of early morning sessions with the terminator, Nick Isiekwe

“They have been working out together early in the mornings before breakfast, working on their defensive skills. and we are pleased with the way both those young guys are going and (Ollie) Chessum. There is nothing between then but Charlie has got a little bit of an edge and experience. He is a very good lineout student, so he helps Maro in that way in running the lineouts.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

119 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The All Blacks growth Ian Foster says was 'lost in translation' in 2023 Foster's All Blacks growth 'lost in translation'
Search