Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

One of the favourites to be next All Blacks coach withdraws

Japan head coach Jamie Joseph and attack coach Tony Brown with Ireland head coach Joe Schmidt prior to the 2019 Rugby World Cup Pool A match between Japan and Ireland at the Shizuoka Stadium Ecopa in Fukuroi, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

New Zealand assistant coach Joe Schmidt has confirmed that he will not lead the All Blacks next year, as his focus will remain on this year’s Rugby World Cup. Responding to speculation that he was in the mix to replace outgoing head coach Ian Foster, Schmidt ruled himself out of the expedited New Zealand Rugby appointment process.

ADVERTISEMENT

Schmidt, the former Ireland head coach, said that the coaching appointment process comes too soon for him, as he is reluctant to make any commitment for 2024. “In the shorter term, I will work hard to support the All Blacks in 2023,” he said.

Schmidt took up a Super Rugby Pacific assistant role with the Blues last year before joining the All Blacks coaching staff as an assistant. In seven years as Irish head coach, he led the team to three Six Nations titles, including a Grand Slam in 2018, and their first-ever wins over New Zealand.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Two former All Blacks forwards, Scott Robertson and Jamie Joseph, are widely believed to be the only contenders to take the top spot when Foster stands down after the World Cup. Robertson, who has led the Crusaders to six Super Rugby titles, is the favorite to take charge in 2024. Joseph has more international experience, having coached Japan since finishing as coach of the Highlanders in 2016.

The new coach is expected to be unveiled by mid-April after NZ Rugby announced this month that it wants to ensure it recruits a world-class candidate in a competitive market. Foster has been critical of the timing of the appointment process, saying it could prove to be a distraction for him and the All Blacks players this year.

Schmidt, who is 57 years old, said that he has enjoyed being back on the grass coaching with the Blues and the All Blacks, and he appreciates those opportunities. However, presented with a condensed time frame this year, he won’t be applying for any coaching roles that extend beyond the Rugby World Cup.

“I will always be grateful for the opportunity to coach at the highest level, and I wish the All Blacks every success in the future,” Schmidt said.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search