Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Owen Farrell explains his final whistle clash with Willie le Roux

(Photo by Paul Harding/Getty Images)

Owen Farrell has shrugged off his post-final whistle altercation with South Africa’s Willie le Roux.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saturday’s Rugby World Cup semi-final ended in rancour in Paris, the England skipper getting involved in a heated exchange with the Springboks replacement and other players from both sides joined in before the anger eventually subsided.

Asked what had occurred, Farrell said: “It was nothing. Nothing. Just a misunderstanding.”

The out-half was the scorer of all 15 of his team’s points and it appeared for a long while that his 53rd-minute drop goal, which was preceded by four successful first-half penalty kicks, would be enough to edge England into the final next weekend versus New Zealand.

Video Spacer

England v South Africa

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 1:29
Loaded: 11.12%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 1:29
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    England v South Africa

    Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

    Watch Free

    However, the Springboks struck with a 69th-minute converted RG Snyman try to cut the margin to 15-13 and they then moved 15-16 ahead with Handre Pollard’s 78th-minute penalty from long range.

    Fixture
    Rugby World Cup
    England
    15 - 16
    Full-time
    South Africa
    All Stats and Data

    “I’m sat here disappointed but unbelievably proud of what this group has done over this past five months together,” said Farrell, sitting at the same auditorium top table where his father Andy had sat seven days earlier when talking about Ireland’s quarter-final exit to the All Blacks.

    “It’s not all gone our way but to build up to a performance like we did, ultimately to come short to a great team like South Africa, I’m sat here disappointed but unbelievably proud of what this group has done.

    “The contest was always going to be a good one. We knew that before the game. I thought the fight that we showed throughout the game, we thought we might have done enough to win but unfortunately South Africa had a bit to say in that, so congratulations to them.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “I felt like we were playing well. I felt like we were playing to our plan. I felt like we were showing what we were capable of and to do that on a stage like this, in a semi-final, is exactly what you want.”

    Related

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

    Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

    The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    119 Comments
    T
    Tom 639 days ago

    Well this was the clickbaitiest article of the year to date.


    Farrell is an aggressive guy and people hate him so.. he's gonna get in a lot of fights.

    A
    Adam 639 days ago

    It’s incredible how the ability to hide behind a keyboard turns people into angry 10 year olds.

    D
    Dx 639 days ago

    A bigger pair of C U next Tuesdays you couldn't find.

    A
    Ashraf 639 days ago

    It's not luck,it's pure determination, and drive. A win is a win

    T
    Tee 639 days ago

    Willie leroux is such a puss

    J
    Johannes 638 days ago

    Wow that did not change anything, what’s your point. Throw slurs at people that’s the best you can do. It’s a sign of a weak mind.

    T
    Tele 639 days ago

    So what was the explanation that was promised in the headline?

    R
    Rocky 640 days ago

    England played better smarter than South Africa. S/A were lucky to win.

    J
    Johannes 638 days ago

    It was certainly not SA best game, if they played a better game how different the final score would have been. If that was England best game and South Africa worst game, how good are you really England.

    B
    Bengine 639 days ago

    Did they? They did play well and they did disprupt SA’s game but how many times did they threaten the try line? If you break it down they did a bunch of high kicks that put SA under pressure but they never did anything with that advantage. SA took the game to the England try line 3 times - and in one case had Farrell escaping what should have been a yellow card for interferring with play in an off sides position. SA passed up two relatively easy penalties (to equal Englands bag) to go for position - the difference was Farrel’s drop kick.England deserve kudos for the way they played but lets get real - the only reason they had a sniff was because SA was playing extremely poorly.

    J
    Jonathan 639 days ago

    Agree. But England were lucky to reach a semi final…

    B
    BLOODSTAAN 639 days ago

    The best team wins the game who was the better team to win the game Bokke bokke

    g
    glenn 639 days ago

    England at their best couldn’t beat the Springboks at their worst

    N
    Ninjin 639 days ago

    But South Africa did win. What matters at the end of the game? The score and you dont get points for style or smarts. You do win games however by not giving up.

    H
    Henry 640 days ago

    England played for penalties whereas the Springboks played 15 man rugby, scoring a seven pointer try and a penalty in the dying minutes of the game, which sealed the game for the Boks.

    T
    Tom 639 days ago

    Didn't see any 15 man rugby from SA. The rest of what you said is true.

    G
    Gil 640 days ago

    Farrell never can help himself, another misunderstandingeast it wasn’t a suspension, beyond my how he is captain, he gave SA the 3 point penalty that put us out the RWC..bravo

    J
    Johannes 638 days ago

    It’s all political, let’s pay attention to Farrells behavior or would the English press prefer to divert the attention to someone else. Farrel one hell of a player but your antics is disgusting.

    p
    patrick 640 days ago

    A s.a would have a hybrid team too but no players want to go live in s.a

    M
    Mike 619 days ago

    ….yep Pat ol boy, they wouldn’t last a week in the sun and having to drink real beer, and learn the English language proper like what you fink ay?

    N
    Ninjin 639 days ago

    Sorry we dont want or need your players. But sure you may take one or two of ours. We dont mind as we have plenty and dont mind to share.

    H
    Henry 640 days ago

    60 million people live in South Africa and they support their teams whenever they play in all international games!

    D
    DA 640 days ago

    🥰👄

    J
    Joe 640 days ago

    As I thought, your a cabbage 🤣

    Keep taking the meds 😁

    S
    Sebastian 640 days ago

    Can Willie le Roux every stop talking/whining. I’m so pleased he’s at the end of his career because I’m sick of seeing him complaining.

    J
    Jaco 640 days ago

    Absolutely!

    We have been spared this for a few years while he was in Japan.

    Playing for the Bulls next year, so we`ll see this every week-end in RSA.

    D
    DA 640 days ago

    🤣🖕🙄🥰👄

    J
    Joe 640 days ago

    Are you drunk or on drugs!!!

    Think you need to have a look at yourself Derek

    C
    CO 640 days ago

    An ugly and unnecessary post match scene as despite being bailed out by the Kiwi ref Willie point blank refusing to shout the first round of pints.


    Boks and their supporters infamous for world's longest pockets and shortest fingers.


    Kiwi ref had no idea who to send through to the final with both teams entirely focused on trying to finish second to avoid being this week's Argentina.

    a
    abdoulaye 640 days ago

    Every time the RWC is the same.

    Many beautiful games, some surprises, then the final.

    And a Southern Hemisphere team wins.

    D
    DA 640 days ago

    stop trying to stay relevant like your stupid de’ lollipop. He should rather get his financial affairs in order and stop cheating people out of money. Bye-bye Jojo

    A
    A 640 days ago

    england played out of their skins .Best game in years.

    Boks were poor.

    We still won.

    End of story.

    D
    Dekenba 640 days ago

    “We”.


    What position did you play?

    E
    EW 640 days ago

    Don’t forget Farrell hitting the ball out of Reinach’s hands while laying on the ground, that is a yellow card, a professional foul.

    A
    Ajit 640 days ago

    Farrel should have been carded many times. Surprising the non of the refs spotted the foul master!

    A
    Andrew 641 days ago

    If we had same ref from SA NZ game at Twickenham England would've had someone in the bin early on. Engaging maul before jumper had even got to ground, but NZ ref didn't see it, not once, plus the amount of off the ball interference to, Marlene holding onto Faf. PSDT rightfully got penalised for stepping in front of kick chaser, but every time SA kick England players were looking around for chasers to obstruct. First scrum penalty, England pulled their not fully taking the hit, which made our guys lose footing, cleaver play, but amounted to naught.

    B
    Bruiser 641 days ago

    Refs need to start pinging Boks for their illegal lineout play, holding the jumper in the as or whilst advancing the lineout. And their constant taking out of players past the tackler in the ruck clearout.

    J
    Jan 641 days ago

    For those who like to look for photo material after the game that may show the ref has cost them points!!! england offside with startoff drop kick. Penalty for Bokke - 3 points and minus the penalty for england.

    H
    HardYakka 641 days ago

    No need, I think everyone knows England are playing terrible rugby at the moment and were lucky the rain fell and helped them spoil the game.


    They have some good players for running rugby, hope they get a new coach soon.

    E
    EV 641 days ago

    England always show up in the World Cup. Great warrior mentality.


    Rassie was not gaslighting when he said England would turn up.


    Its the old enemy.

    B
    B.J. Spratt 641 days ago

    That’s it they show up and “Bore millions of Fans throughout the World. Once again never scored a try, cause they couldn’t break SA Defense and see that as “We showed up”


    Jacked draw for England to make final by a corrupt old C called Billy Beaumont

    C
    Corne 641 days ago

    The quarter finals should be determined by the respective teams’ ranking at the start of the RWC. This way you ensure that rankings are important and relevant until the start of the tournament. This will also provide a better semi and final.

    Example. If the rankings of 8 teams to top pools are as follows:

    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11.

    QF:

    Match A: 1 v 11

    B: 2 v 9

    C: 3 v 8

    D: 4 v 5


    Semis

    Winner A v Winner D

    Winner B v Winner C


    People don't know who will play in QF's before tournament anyway.

    r
    robert 639 days ago

    That’s a fair comment but it would exclude developing sides. That said I think they should make two tiers of 12 countries that play each other to qualify of the course of 4 years. Each year 4 are relegated from tier one. A bit like the premiership. there’s also SOOO much more that goes on logistically other than rugby. Hotels, training grounds, flights, transport so many things are booked a year in advance for teams. This couldn’t be done a month before kick off. That’s why the draw is done so early, but agree something needs to be done as 3 years is way over the top.

    C
    Colin 641 days ago

    Simple answer like Warren Gatland said, finish better in the previous world Cup, problem solved.

    F
    FM 641 days ago

    I was cheering for England, but in the end, if they want to win games, they must start scoring tries against real contenders.

    e
    etienne 640 days ago

    True. But you have to lay your foundation first by doing the basics right

    W
    Willie 641 days ago

    Justin really ! Your comment has justification, but there’s a reason Owen is not liked. He mouths off too much. Maybe it’s due to his passion ?

    J
    Joe 641 days ago

    Oh Willie Willie your another one that’s never probably played in an high intensity , decent level rugby match, wanting to win.

    Thankfully Borthwick and Sinfield have.

    “ It’s all about taking part chaps”

    C
    Colin 641 days ago

    Le Roux was jumping around like a child because he knew they'd just scraped through, he deserved a slap for behaving like a kid, Owen Farrell shows the same passion as any leader and number two all time points scorer, he knows what he’s doing. NZ by 20 points next week.

    J
    Justin 641 days ago

    Every opposition team always has a fall guy, that the fans give it to. Take it as a sign of respect that Owen is the most disliked Rose, coz he’s probably one of the best. Some extra self belief, and maybe they could have kicked for corners and scored a 7 pointer… tis tis. That was daylight robbery, but we'll take it. That winning mentality is probably not something you can teach, I think it’s in SA rugby DNA. And kudos to Rassie for the key subs. England played way above what people expected, so well done to them. That my UK friends was a south african smash and grab. Oh, and Willie is worse than Owen. He needs to keep his mouth shut and stop waving his hands at the ref. He’s not the captain, and a pretty average 15 at that.

    B
    BigMaul 641 days ago

    You do realise that it was your hero, Owen, who didn’t have the balls to go for the 7 and instead wanted to pad his stat sheet by taking the 3. Oh no, you probably don’t realise, because based on your comment, you are incapable of stringing together a logical thought grounded in reality. You’re an embarrassment to English fans. South Africa were deserved winners, well done South Africa. From an England fan. We’re not all as obnoxious as Justin.

    D
    DA 641 days ago

    when you can do better than Willie then you can rant and rave. But until then maybe you should keep your mouth shut.

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    N
    NH 1 hour ago
    Harness Skelton's might and move Sua'ali'i: How the Wallabies can fix things for Test two

    Nice one Nick. I was a fan of Joe’s appointment and think in general he has done well, and I even think the game plan last week was ok, but I am not sold he has gotten his selections right for this series. As everyone has detailed, the pack was too small last week. This week, he has brought in skelton and valetini which is an improvement physicality-wise but now the back 5 is out of balance with only one legitimate lineout option in Frost. The wallabies were poor in the lineout and it meant they couldn’t get into the lions 22 in the 1st half. Its also where most WBs tries originate from. Are they going to opt for a scrum every penalty they get? 3 man lineouts? And as you show, Suaalii is simply too hesitant in D. I guess drifting is better than biting in and taking yourself out of play, but he doesn’t do much more in that last clip. Maxy has 2 involvements in that play, suaalii none. At this rate, Chieka was quicker and better at integrating marika who had more to do to learn the game, than Joe with suaalii.


    Do you think that Joe is hesitant to put Suaalii on the wing because he would be exposed in the backfield in terms of kicking, positioning etc? This is the only justification I can think of and also maybe why he has picked the likes of max, potter and kellaway over the likes of daugunu, pietsch and toole. The difference in selection philosophy between schmidt and rennie has come into clear focus to me recently in terms of brain vs braun, power vs graft, workrate vs impact. In my opinion, Schmidt needed to make a hard decision on starting skelton vs a backrow that had bobby and wilson in it and he hasn’t done that. I also feel like he is almost picking a team to minimise the loss rather than win. I think starting a tate, or a pietsch, or bell could’ve signalled some more intent.

    5 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING 'No regard for what anyone’s done in the past': Verdict on Pollock from inside Lions camp 'No regard for what anyone’s done in the past': Verdict on Pollock