Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

High tackles grab headlines again and it's not just Farrell's latest effort

Owen Farrell

High tackles were at the centre of attention again in round eight of the Gallagher Premiership as cards were, or more importantly, were not handed out.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is a topic that will always be complicated, and there will never be universal agreement at decisions, but this past weekend was particularly contentious.

Bristol Bears’ loosehead Jordan Lay saw yellow against Leicester Tigers on Saturday for his high shot on Telusa Veainu. Referee JP Doyle conceded that he did try to make a legal tackle, but clipped his head nonetheless, and in this current climate it warranted a card.

There were two incidents after Bristol’s match which have caused more controversy though. The first involved Saracens’ Owen Farrell for his shoulder to the neck of Worcester Warriors winger Tom Howe. The England flyhalf has a reputation for dubious tackles, and this has once again been assigned to the catalogue of hits he has got away with, much to the spleen of fans.

https://twitter.com/MikeP39369411/status/1213800738121568259?s=20
https://twitter.com/mert198012/status/1213732345766957057?s=20
https://twitter.com/ferns_douglas/status/1213600379046440961?s=20

However, while some feel that Farrell receives preferential treatment, Northampton Saints centre Rory Hutchinson was just as lucky in a frenzied match against Wasps on Sunday for a very similar tackle on Charlie Matthews.

https://twitter.com/Alex90Lan/status/1213869353621434369?s=20

ADVERTISEMENT

Referee Matthew Carley let the Scotland centre off for his tackle as Matthews’ body position had lowered before contact. It was perhaps also helped by the fact that the Saints had just seen Tom Collins receive a red card for taking Jacob Umaga out in the air, and were about to see Cobus Reinach handed a yellow card.

https://twitter.com/RoundRugby/status/1213868183939104768?s=20
https://twitter.com/JPearce_JP/status/1213863843576864775?s=20

Farrell and Hutchinson were saved by the fact that they were secondary tacklers on players that were already going to ground, unlike Lay, who was the sole tackler on Veainu. However, given some of the dismissals seen over the past twelve months, no one would have complained if the Englishman or the Scot were sent off, or at least sent to the sin-bin.

There would possibly have been even more uproar if one of the Saracen or Saint was punished and the other one was not, meaning there is a degree of consistency amongst the decisions, albeit what many feel were the wrong decisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

While there was plenty of confusion during the Rugby World Cup at the liberality in which cards were awarded, that has quickly become the norm and the standard set, and now there is perhaps as much bewilderment at the lack of punishment.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

202 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search