Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Own worst enemy': Steve Lansdown on rugby's 'black hole' economics

By PA
(Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

Bristol owner Steve Lansdown insists Premiership Rugby must generate more revenue after describing investing in the English club game as a black hole. The sport is reeling from a grim Wednesday when it was announced that Wasps have given notice of their intention to appoint administrators while Worcester have been set the deadline of 5pm on Monday to prove they have a credible plan for survival or face suspension from all competitions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both clubs are saddled by vast debts and are the subject of winding-up orders from HMRC because of unpaid tax, while collectively all 13 Gallagher Premiership sides are thought to be over £500million in the red.

Bristol owe in excess of £50m to their billionaire owner and Lansdown admits that getting involved in the sport requires deep pockets, despite a cash injection from private equity firm CVC and low-interest loans from the Government designed to soften the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The 72-year-old insists that Premiership Rugby, which oversees the running of the only fully professional league in the country, must do more. “Rugby in a way is its own worst enemy,” Lansdown told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“It’s a fabulous game and attracts great spectators and fans, but there is a question of the revenue going into the business. For people to invest in it, it’s a passion. It’s not one you can point to and say you can invest in it and make a return on your money.

Related

“So you have to go in with your eyes open that it is going to be a bit of a black hole for a time and that is the difficulty. We had the funding through the pandemic but it’s in the form of loans and that is one of the problems that certainly Worcester is faced with. When you borrow money you do have to have the ability to repay it or the ability to know that it will be converted into equity.

“If the funding is free, then it is more than welcome, but you don’t get anything for nothing in this life. The reality is what PRL [Premiership Rugby] need to do is to focus on commercial revenue or generating new revenue and improving the offering that we get to attract investors into the sport.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The pandemic has had a profound impact on club finances and Bristol owner Lansdown also hinted at dissatisfaction over the deal struck with CVC, who in 2018 paid £200m for a 27 per cent share of the Premiership.

“Covid has been a major factor in recent times, exacerbating the problem. There is just not enough money in the game – that is the answer,” Lansdown said. “All clubs get their revenue mainly through ticket sales, central revenue and commercial revenue.

“Central revenue has been on the decline in recent years because of covid and lack of playing. Match day revenue obviously dropped off a cliff with covid and commercial revenue hasn’t picked up. We had the deal with CVC but to date, that’s been a little bit disappointing. Hopefully, we will see that improving in the future.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 31 minutes ago
Gloucester respond to complaints over Russian flag

I don't listen to Nigel Farage. Really not sure where you'd be getting that from. Maybe you should stick to responding to what I've actually said, rather than speculating about my sources.


I'm not sure what you think Putin is going to do. He'll probably conquer Ukraine, but its taken him a long time, and cost him a lot of soldiers. Hitler overran France in a matter of weeks and then started bombing Britain. At this rate Putin might make it to Paris by 2080? I think he'll give up long before then!


I don't see what Stalinist language policy has to do with any of what we're talking about. De-Ukrainization took place in the 1930s, but the genocide of Palestine is taking place in 2025. If your argument is that the invasion of Ukraine is part of a longer history of Russian suppression of Ukraine then you might have a point, but that really just underlines the key difference between Hitler and Putin; Hitler wanted to dominate as much area as possible and so posed a threat to all of Europe, whereas Putin wants to force the assimilation of those who have historically been within the Russian sphere of influence, so only poses a threat to eastern europe and central asia.


"Read and think for yourself."

What would you recommend I read? On the genocide of Palestine I've found Patrick Wolfe's "Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native" and Sai Englert's "Settlers, Workers, and the Logic of Accumulation by Dispossession" especially useful - they might disabuse you of the notion that what we are witnessing is an "authoritarian criminal syndicate" fighting a nation! - rather Zionist genocide is a largely democratic process, arising from a structure of settler colonialism which has no analogue in Ukraine.

8 Go to comments
F
Flankly 1 hour ago
Six players Rassie Erasmus must hand Springbok debuts to in 2025

Sloppy piece by Josh. It should be Stormers, obviously.


Also:

David Kriel, who, like Hooker, is comfortable in both the midfield and the back-tree

Being comfortable in trees is kind of a quirky qualification for the Boks Office lads to emphasize.

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘I’m coming for you’: Byron McGuigan’s Mancunian malevolence ‘I’m coming for you’: Byron McGuigan’s Mancunian malevolence
Search