Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ox Nche tackles allegation that law variation will depower scrums

Springboks prop Ox Nche (Photo by Jean Catuffe/Getty Images)

Rugby World Cup winner Ox Nche has shared his thoughts on The Rugby Championship introducing several law variations from this weekend. The Sharks loosehead has been named to start for South Africa versus Australia in Brisbane on Saturday, a fixture that will see two laws tweaked regarding the scrum.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Firstly, a scrum must be set 30 seconds from when the mark for the scrum is made by the referee. If this doesn’t happen, a free kick shall be awarded at place of scrum against the team causing the delay. 

Secondly, once play in the scrum begins, the scrum-half of the team not in possession must take up a position with both feet no further than the centre line of the tunnel; or permanently retires to a point on the offside line either at that team’s hindmost foot, or permanently retires at least five metres behind the hindmost foot. If he doesn’t the sanction will be a penalty.  

Video Spacer

Protection of 9 at base of scrum and maul | Law trials

Referee Brendon Pickerell goes through the law trials surrounding the protection of the number nine around the ruck and the maul.

Video Spacer

Protection of 9 at base of scrum and maul | Law trials

Referee Brendon Pickerell goes through the law trials surrounding the protection of the number nine around the ruck and the maul.

“I don’t think the law variation making the scrum 30 seconds is depowering scrums but it demands a bit more from the front rowers, the entire forward pack actually,” said Nche at a media briefing on Wednesday ahead of his 32nd Test appearance. 

“You have a lot of people talking about how the scrum is and I have said in previous interviews, people who don’t want scrums in the game should go and watch rugby league, there’s no scrums there.  

Fixture
Rugby Championship
Australia
7 - 33
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

“In this they have adapted well, making the scrum a little bit quicker, making sure that for you to come and deliver your trade to show the world what you are really good at as a tight forward, then you have to meet the fitness requirements, make sure you set quickly, make sure the game just keeps on flowing and you don’t have guys milking, slowing the ball down just because they are at a disadvantage or anything.  

“It’s actually beneficial but it requires a bit more from the forwards. The teams that will adapt quickest to the variations are the ones that are going to do well really.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

Nche added the Springboks scrum set-up has usually been inside the new deadline that will be in use at Suncorp Stadium. “It shouldn’t be a problem. We looked at all our scrums even before these slight law changes and we always play way before 30 seconds so it shouldn’t be a problem for us.  

“We just have to adapt. We did speak about it, and we made plans for it. We will just simply adapt. It shouldn’t be a problem for us.” 

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search