Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Paper talk': Phil Kearns dismisses report of replacing Rugby Australia boss Raelene Castle

Kearns has issued a warning to Rugby Australia. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Former Wallabies star Phil Kearns has dismissed a report suggesting that he could replace under-fire Rugby Australia chief executive Raelene Castle.

ADVERTISEMENT

The game in Australia has found itself in turmoil in recent times as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, which has forced the suspension of rugby around the globe and led to cost cutting and slashed salaries of RA staff.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Castle has found herself under further pressure as a public dispute between RA and the Rugby Union Players Association (RUPA) has broken out as the association sought full access to the governing body’s financial information after repeated requests.

In a statement released on Saturday morning, the RUPA announced that it had been granted access, but Castle remains under intense scrutiny following widespread criticism of her tenure.

There has reportedly been a growing sense of frustration with power brokers towards those in charge of the game in Australia after Castle declared a performance rating of 72 percent at the union’s annual general meeting on Monday.

At that same meeting, the organisation announced a $9.4 million loss for 2019 over a 12-month period which saw a quarter-final exit by the Wallabies at the World Cup, the Israel Folau saga, severely low attendance figures and numerous high-profile player depart Super Rugby.

Adding to Castle’s woes was RA’s inability to secure a new broadcast deal, culminating in a report from the Daily Telegraph that Kearns is set to take her spot as the most powerful figure in Australian rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the 67-test former Wallabies hooker – who won two World Cups and now works as an outspoken commentator for Fox Sports – told foxsports.com.au that he has denied making a play to succeed Castle.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday that Castle had retained the full backing of the RA board after having stood down 75 percent of her workforce in a cost cutting measure enforced on the organisation by the coronavirus outbreak.

In what the SMH described as “the most difficult and tumultuous week in the game’s history”, Castle’s dispute with the RUPA boss Justin Harrison was compounded by a powerful group of former Wallabies – Kearns, Rod Kafer and George Gregan advocating for change in power.

With COVID-19 ravaging the sport in Australia, Castle also took a 50 percent pay cut, which is understood to have left her with a salary worth around $400,000, more than what most professional players earn throughout the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pay slash comes as projections indicate a doomsday scenario that RA could face a deficit of a $90 million should no rugby be played for the remainder of the year.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 15 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

39 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Barrett and Prendergast put Leinster European rivals on notice Barrett and Prendergast put Leinster European rivals on notice
Search