Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Past the point of no return: Where to next for Israel Folau and Rugby Australia?

Israel Folau. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The past 48 hours in the global rugby community have been turbulent to say the least given the repercussions that have come with Israel Folau’s ill-advised social media outburst.

ADVERTISEMENT

Players have had their contracts terminated for all sorts of reasons over the course of time, but a player of such talent and stature within the international game being dumped for inciting hate speech so publicly as Folau has done is unprecedented.

As was the case when Folau first lambasted the gay population around this time last year, his polarising Instagram and Twitter posts, shared on Wednesday, were met with a landslide of controversy and outcry from leading rugby stars, sponsors and influential figures worldwide, while also catching the attention of media personalities and even politicians.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison today joined New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and the ever-growing chorus of voices in condemning Folau’s statements, but it was yesterday where the full impact of Folau’s words were uncovered.

While his comments last year went largely unpunished – a stern warning was dished out by Rugby Australia following a meeting with CEO Raelene Castle and New South Wales chief executive Andrew Hore – it’s apparent that Folau’s relationship with both organisations has become untenable.

As a result, Castle and Hore released a statement on Thursday announcing their intentions to sack the 30-year-old.

Raelene Castle/ (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

From a purely rugby perspective, it leaves both parties from either side of the sacking in a difficult situation.

Folau was regarded by many as a player who Australia’s World Cup hopes depended on in Japan later this year, such is the aerial threat and destructive ball-running ability that he possesses.

Last weekend, he became Super Rugby’s leading all-time try scorer after towering above the defending Melani Nanai to pluck the ball from the air and slam it over the tryline to score his 60th competition try during the Waratahs’ 32-29 loss to the Blues at Eden Park.

It exemplified why he is regarded as the best player under the high ball in world rugby, and why he would have to be in the conversation for one of the best in that facet of the game the world has ever seen.

ADVERTISEMENT

Combine that with his freakish ability to pierce through opposition defences with ball in hand thanks to his outstanding physical stature and supreme athleticism, and it must be a bitter pill to swallow for Wallabies fans to see him go as they prepare for rugby’s global showpiece event in five months’ time.

As Alex Shaw highlighted yesterday, there are plenty of options on the table for head coach Michael Cheika and fellow selectors Scott Johnson and Michael O’Connor to replace Folau with.

Dane Haylett-Petty, Reece Hodge, Kurtley Beale and Tom Banks all have cases for selection, but none have the complete athletic, ball-running, aerial package that the 73-test veteran offered.

Cheika and the Wallabies have a very tough job on their hands in finding a suitable candidate to fill Folau’s role within a five-month timeframe, but it is a job that is necessary as Castle and Hore made the right call to cut ties with their star man.

Not only is it the correct decision from a moral and ethical standpoint for a union that is trying to embrace inclusivity and diversity as it fights to stay relevant within the Australian sporting landscape against other codes such as league, AFL and football, it was a correct decision from an employment perspective.

Folau signed a high-paying four-year deal with Rugby Australia last October which reportedly included clauses regarding the use of his social media accounts following last year’s incident.

Additionally, by signing that new contract, Folau agreed to abide by RA’s Code of Conduct, which, in Part Two under the players’ agreement, includes the following:

  • 1.3 – Treat everyone equally, fairly and with dignity regardless of gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, ethnicity, cultural or religious background, age or disability. Any form of bullying, harassment or discrimination has no place in Rugby.
  • 1.7 – Use Social Media appropriately. By all means share your positive experiences of Rugby but do not use Social Media as a means to breach any of the expectations and requirements of you as a player contained in this Code or in any Union, club or competition rules and regulations.

Although it is reassuring to see the stand against Folau’s outburst by some of the game’s top players and leading politicians, it only takes a brief scroll through various social media channels to see the views of those who disagree with RA’s morals and ethics by releasing Folau.

For everyone who has opposed his anti-gay stances, many have leapt to Folau’s defence as they question his right to freedom of speech, regardless of how deplorable it may be.

Yes, Folau has the right to speak his mind just as anyone else does, but, by contractually binding himself to treat all people from all walks of life as equals, both in reality and on social media, means that there are employment consequences that come with making those posts.

Regardless of whether anyone is for or against what Folau stands for, Castle and Hore are well within their rights to dismiss him, especially as it’s the second time he’s breached their code.

It won’t entirely stamp out bigotry within the rugby landscape, but RA’s stance against Folau at the second time of asking is a strong one that sends a message that no player is bigger than the game, regardless of how vital they are to any one side.

As for Folau, his rugby-playing career is almost all but dead.

You can bet no Super Rugby club will want to take him in in the foreseeable future, and given the recent comments made by UK-based players such as James Haskell, Joe Marler and Gareth Thomas, as well as that of Toulon owner Mourad Boudjellal, a move to European rugby seems unlikely.

Even the Southern Kings, who were willing to drop upwards of 20 players in their pursuit to sign Julian Savea and Jacques Potgieter from Toulon earlier this week, will be wary of doing the same for Folau.

Despite reported initial interest from the North Queensland Cowboys to fill the hole left by disgraced fullback Ben Barba and the NFL-bound Valentine Holmes, Australian Rugby League chairman Peter Beattie has said Folau is unwelcome to return to the NRL, where he began his code-hopping career 12 years ago.

A two-year stint in the AFL with Greater Western Sydney in 2011 and 2012 was largely unsuccessful, and it’s unlikely the AFL would want anything to do with Folau in the wake of this drama.

However, no formal statement has been made by those in charge of that code regarding their standpoint on the matter, meaning it could still be an option should Folau want to take it.

Before any career decisions are made, what Folau needs first and foremost is support.

His publicised opinions are absolutely objectionable, and, if he hasn’t already, will probably become the target of a raft of abuse for his hurtful and damaging hate speech.

That’s the result of his own doing, but it’s cost him his career, which – and most rugby fans will agree – is incredibly disappointing for someone who was such a brilliant player and lit up the field on a week-to-week basis.

He’ll need some time off to assess what the future holds for him next, but at this stage, he’s past the point of return for not only most rugby clubs, but most, if not all, codes of football, bringing the curtain down on the career of one of the most talented players of this generation.

Watch – Folau in hot water again:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search