Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pat Lam proud of performance as Bristol see off Exeter in high-scoring thriller

By PA
Bristol boss Pat Lam (Photo by Seb Daly/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Bristol director of rugby Pat Lam expressed his pride in his players as they ran in eight tries in a 52-38 West Country derby victory over Exeter at Ashton Gate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jack Bates scored a hat-trick of tries and James Williams crossed twice for the Bears, who managed to overcome their opponents despite a red card for back rower Santiago Grondona on the half hour.

Benhard Janse van Rensburg, Harry Randall and Steven Luatua were also on the try sheet while Harry Byrne slotted six conversions to move Bristol within a point of Gallagher Premiership leaders Bath.

Related

“We showed a lot of composure, managed the game really well, we chose the right options, didn’t panic, and really showed the growth of the group,” Lam said of the performance.

“We said at half-time ‘well, that’s entertaining!’, but our one issue was our defence and I showed the boys some clips where we were over-committing at rucks and were too tight around the rucks.

“It was an easy fix, and with 14 men the boys managed it so well. We were just disappointed to give away the two tries at the end when we were out on our feet.”

New Exeter head coach Rob Hunter, who was promoted to the role from forwards coach on Thursday to replace Ali Hepher, was also full of praise for his team’s performance as they ran in tries through Martin Moloney, Henry Slade, Dafydd Jenkins, Josh Hodge, Jack Yeandle and Will Rigg.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hunter said: “I am super proud of the lads. We had some highs and lows in that game but we stuck at it, and we showed some real resilience and we are going to get better.”

Six tries were scored in the opening 16 minutes alone, and Hunter added: “It was a crazy opening but fair play to Bristol, they’ve got a particular attacking style that is really difficult to deal with.

“They’ve got a really great attack and if I wasn’t personally involved in the game, I’m sure it would have been quite nice to watch that. But they are very, very good, they’re really clinical and they’ve got some great little plays which are really hard to defend.

“There are so many things we need to work on right now. It’s just which ones we prioritise in the short term, but there are not really any areas of our programme that I’m not prepared to rip up in terms of getting better.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve got an incredibly committed group of players and staff. I’m super excited by the challenge.”

Win British & Irish Lions Merchandise! We have Replica Jerseys, Backpacks, Caps, Bobble Hats and Scarves up for grabs. Enter now.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Poorfour 15 minutes ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-England star's hat-trick helps Force to Super win over Fijian Drua Ex-England star's hat-trick helps Force to Super win over Fijian Drua
Search