Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pat Lam puts Bristol win over Northampton down to 'pure guts'

By PA
Bristol Bears' Director of Rugby Pat Lam (Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Bristol Bears director of rugby Pat Lam hailed the guts shown by his side as they came from behind to claim a 33-27 win over Northampton Saints at cinch Stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite trailing 19-8 in the first half, Bears were able to come from behind to secure a bonus-point success, repelling some late Saints charges to make it two wins from two this season.

Lam was understandably delighted at the way his team came through a tough test.

He said: “I am very proud of the team.

“Once again, the second week in a row, we played as a team.

“Saints came out firing, we had to repel them a couple of times and they scored a couple of good tries but there was a lot of guts from us, particularly when we were down to 14 men with Gabriel Ibitoye in the sin bin.

Video Spacer

Steve Borthwick previews the World Cup semifinal showdown between England and South Africa

Video Spacer

Steve Borthwick previews the World Cup semifinal showdown between England and South Africa

“We just kept them out and worked our way back into the game.

“The messaging from the players at half-time, and even after they scored out of nothing from the charge down when we were attacking early in the second half, was all so calm.

“In the end it was just pure guts and keeping to our systems.

“(Defence coach) Jordan Crane has put a lot of work defending from our try-line and they stuck to it and we got the bonus-point win so I am very pleased.”

Related

Two tries from Tom Seabrook and another from Tom Pearson allowed Saints to build a lead before the break.

ADVERTISEMENT

However Magnus Bradbury notched his second try shortly before half-time as Bears got back to within a point.

Tommy Freeman wrapped up the bonus point for the home side but from there, Bristol seized control, Max Lahiff and Harry Thacker helping them pull clear, much to the frustration of Saints director of rugby Phil Dowson.

He said: “It was very disappointing.

“I thought for the first 38 minutes of the game, we looked very good, we looked strong and it was 19-11 just before half-time and we conceded a score that changed the whole complexion of the first half.

“It gave them a lot of energy and in the second half, we never really got into our stride.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We gave away a lot of penalties and a yellow card clearly didn’t help either so Bristol came back into the game.

“There’s no lack of effort and we tried to push on in the second half but we just couldn’t get the momentum back after the end of the first half and it took us too long.

“In the last five minutes we had an opportunity but we’re leaving it too late, as we did last week.

“We tried to train to cover some of those injuries and of course they are disruptive, but we’ve got a very capable squad and a very capable group of players to deal with that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
K
KiwiSteve 427 days ago

Is anyone watching the Premiership during the WC?

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search