Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pat Lam reveals when Premiership squad cuts are expected to be imposed

Pat Lam, Director of Rugby of Bristol Bears, speaks to players of Bristol Bears as they huddle after the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Exeter Chiefs and Bristol Bears at Sandy Park on November 05, 2023 in Exeter, England. (Photo by Ryan Hiscott/Getty Images)

Bristol Bears director of rugby Pat Lam does not expect maximum squad sizes to be imposed on Gallagher Premiership clubs as part of the new Professional Game Partnership with the Rugby Football Union until 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lam met up with other Premiership DORs yesterday along with Nigel Melville, Executive Chairman at PRL Investor Board, Conor O’Shea representing the RFU and Phil Winstanley, Rugby Director at Premiership Rugby, to debate the proposals that would see clubs operating with a maximum senior squad of 35 players with a further 12 players in a ‘transition’ group from their academy.

The move is key to the negotiations taking place on central funding for the Premiership from the RFU, understood to be worth £128 million over the next four years.

Video Spacer

Dricus Du Plessis on the heart of a South African | Big Jim Show | RPTV

Video Spacer

Dricus Du Plessis on the heart of a South African | Big Jim Show | RPTV

A dramatic cut in squad sizes would have a significant impact on some Premiership clubs with Bath and Harlequins highlighted as operating with two of the largest squads in the league.

It is designed to try and steer the Premiership clubs towards a more stable financial future after decades of losses. A salary cap has not ended the annual losses and that is why smaller squad sizes are seen as the next step for the professional sport in England.

Lam, who takes his Bristol team to Newcastle on Friday night with the aim of avoiding a third successive loss at Kingston Park, said: “It is unlikely (to come in) next year but probably the year after. There will be time given because every club is at different ends of their cycles and we are coming out of a three year (contract) cycle. Everything has to go back to the owners and the board because they have the ultimate say but the good thing is that we are all in the room together and we want what is best for the game.

“There is a salary cap, but it is around making sure you are prudent and there are a lot of players on the market and some of the top ones are going to command some big dollars. As a club you have to ask yourself how you balance that out with the squad size. The way they have worked out the (maximum) number is that they have looked at injuries for the last six seven years. It is not just a number they have put out there and it is aimed at having the strongest possible squad that is also affordable so we stabilise the clubs going forward. It’s about making it better for everyone.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Is it perfect? Nothing is, but there is a real desire to improve the game in England at international and domestic level. The Premiership was the focus but everyone realises that the Championship is also part of the agreement and there needs to be strong competition.

“The success of the Premiership clubs in the Champions Cup shows how tough this competition is and we sit third from bottom in the league but are just 10 points off the top.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 50 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search