Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pat Lam's playoff hopes in tatters as Harlequins beat Bristol in thriller

By PA
(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Harlequins beat Bristol 38-29 in a 10-try thriller to extend their Premiership winning run to four games.

ADVERTISEMENT

After last season’s epic Premiership semi-final, the sides again provided another compelling spectacle and again it was Harlequins who triumphed.

Last June, Quins came back from 28-0 down to win a classic semi-final 43-36 but this time around, they had the benefit of an early 14-0 lead thanks to Cadan Murley’s two tries before holding off a spirited Bristol effort.

Video Spacer

Back in the Game – RFU

Video Spacer

Back in the Game – RFU

Bristol’s tries came from Steven Luatua, Sam Jeffries, Dave Attwood and Bryan Byrne, with Callum Sheedy converting three and adding a penalty, while Tom Lawday, Hugh Tizard, Jack Walker and Luke Northmore also crossed for Quins with Will Edwards adding four conversions.

Harlequins made a blistering start with Murley scoring two tries in the first four minutes. First full-back Tyrone Green counter-attacked from just outside his 22 and after a flowing 80-metre move, Green was on hand to send Murley flying over in the corner.

From the restart, Bristol secured possession only for their number eight Fitz Harding to throw out a wild pass which Murley collected before racing 65 metres to score.

Bristol needed a quick response and they got one when Luatua performed heroics to hold off three defenders and force his way over but in the next passage of play, the skipper was injured and left the field with an arm injury.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Before 12 minutes had elapsed a fourth try had arrived through Jeffries. He was injured in the process and hobbled off so Bristol had lost both their try-scoring back-rowers within three minutes of one another.

It was then Harlequins’ turn to lose a player when Green was helped off with a leg injury to be replaced by Louis Lynagh.

Despite that setback, the visitors extended their lead with a close-range try from Lawday after a dart from Danny Care had put the defence on the back foot.

Bristol drew level with the sixth try of the first quarter when Attwood rewarded bursts from Antoine Frisch and Harding to cross under the sticks.

ADVERTISEMENT

The action slowed in the second quarter, though Tizard’s bonus-point try for Quins partially offset the loss of Murley through injury and Care to a yellow card.

Related

Quins led 26-19 at the interval but in Care’s absence, Bristol were able to pick up the first try of the second half when Byrne rolled over from a line-out drive.

Care returned with no further damage done but Sheedy put Bristol in front for the first time with a penalty before the hosts introduced Piers O’Conor for his 100th appearance for the club.

Steady rain made the playing conditions more difficult so the game became more conservative but with 15 minutes remaining, Bristol lost Harding to the sin-bin for a high challenge.

It proved significant as Walker finished off a line-out drive and though O’Conor’s tremendous run spurred on Bristol, Quins just kept their line intact and broke out to seal victory when a well-judged kick from Care was seized upon by Northmore to leave any lingering Bristol hopes of a play-off place in tatters.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search