Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Paul The Super Rugby Oracle's Final Prediction: Rugby Will Be The Winner On The Day

Cory Jane

Rugby Pass stats guru Paul Neazor weighs up this weekend’s round of Super Rugby matches and reveals his tips.

ADVERTISEMENT

With both semifinal tips proving bang on the money it has now been three weeks since the eerily prescient Paul made a wrong Super Rugby prediction. He may never be wrong again. His season record stands at 111/141 or 79% going into Saturday’s final. Here’s how he sees it going down.

Hurricanes vs Lions

This has the potential to be one of the best finals the competition has seen, pitting together two very good sides at the top of their game. Both have the necessary attacking mindset and both can defend really hard when required, so whatever happens on Saturday won’t come easy.

Of all recent finals, this one has the most even one-on-ones I can remember. The Lions have a slightly better scrum and probably a better lineout, though the Hurricanes are certainly no mugs. The loose trios are too close to call, but Ardie Savea is the standout individual among the six. The Lions scored more points and more tries this year, but some of that can be attributed to more favourable conditions at Johannesburg, and the Hurricanes aren’t far off the pace anyway.

On the other side, the Hurricanes can defend better – look at their last two Saturdays. The Lions have conceded more tries and more points, but they back themselves to simply outscore any opposition, and in the last couple of months that has been a sound bet.

 
banner5

 

Two factors sway my decision. The first is travel. Nobody has yet managed to cross the Indian Ocean at any stage of the playoffs and win the title, and there’s a reason for that: it’s a difficult, fatiguing trip. At least the Lions only have to come this way in good shape – it doesn’t really matter what state they’re in going home. Some good teams have tried to beat this hoodoo, but as yet none have managed it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The other factor is a little more intangible – it was the way the Lions players reacted at the final whistle in Johannesburg on Saturday. I’m not altogether sure they didn’t play their final last week and that just getting to the big game meant they’ve fulfilled all hopes and dreams for the year. That’s not to say I disregard them as a threat, but the difference in demeanour between the two winners was quite noticeable.

So I’m going to stay with my tried and true at finals time, especially when long-distance travel is involved, and go with the Hurricanes to claim their first title after what should be a cracking match. It’s also one of those games where I suspect if the Canes are ahead with 20 to play, and the Lions are forcing the game, errors might lead to points and the final margin might be a bit bigger than the run of play would suggest.

Pick: Hurricanes (13 and over)

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search