Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Paul the Super Rugby Oracle's Round 6 Tips: Can Paul Finally Pick a Blues Result?

blues

Rugby Pass stats guru Paul Neazor weighs up this weekend’s round of Super Rugby matches and reveals his tips.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the best rugby tipsters have the occasional bad week. The true sign of a tipping genius is how they bounce back. Super Rugby oracle Paul Neazor held his nerve with his Round 5 tips and correctly predicted 7 of the weekend’s 8 games. That brings his tally for the year to 31/41 (31/37 if you ignore the Blues), a 76% success rate. What does Round 6 hold in store?

Highlanders vs Force
The Highlanders somehow managed to lose this fixture six times in a row between 2008 and 2014, but that won’t happen this week. The Force have problems on and off the field, and the Highlanders aren’t the sort of side to give them a chance to regroup. The defending champs looked polished at Melbourne and they took every element of risk out of their game. Given that the Force have hit the wall at 60 minutes recently, this one could blow out down the home stretch.
Pick: Highlanders (13 and over)

Lions vs Crusaders
This is shaping as a cracker of a game. The Crusaders might have a slight edge at scrum time and on defence, but the Lions make few errors and have a good kicking from hand game. Elsewhere, the numbers are fairly even. The Lions are a lot more dangerous than the Sharks, and I don’t see their starting as slight favourites to be a silly call. I might stick my neck out here and go for the home side, especially if the Crusaders haven’t fixed their goal-kicking. But there isn’t really a result that would come as a major shock here; be prepared for anything.
Pick: Lions (12 and under)

Blues vs Jaguares
This match is a difficult assignment for both teams. The Jaguares have had to travel from Argentina, losing a day in the process, and the Blues have to believe they can take a team of this calibre. The Jaguares might help them out, as their ball security has been poor all season and the Blues can make teams pay for handling errors. Bookmakers have Blues as quite strong favourites, and while I don’t necessarily agree with the prices I do with the sentiment. Now go back the Jaguares, since I get the Blues calls wrong as a matter of course.
Pick: Blues (12 and under)

Brumbies vs Chiefs
Two of the leading contenders meet in a battle of contrasting styles. Both teams score lots of tries – the Brumbies through the forwards as often as not, and the Chiefs through the backs at a 3:1 ratio. The Brumbies like to have the ball, while the Chiefs like to play in opposition territory; the Chiefs win the lineouts and the Brumbies go better in scrums; the Brumbies defend more accurately but the Chiefs make their opponents fall off more tackles. I think the Brumbies come into this game having played the tougher string recently and therefore will have a slight edge, and I might have to take the home side by one score, much as it pains me.
Pick: Brumbies (12 and under)

Kings vs Sunwolves
Somebody has to win this game, unless it’s a draw. The Kings probably attack better, but the Sunwolves definitely defend better, and both kick for goal pretty well. Still, this is basically a playoff for 17th and 18th. I think I’m going to go against the visiting team trend and pick a Kings win here, although I certainly won’t be off to the TAB on this one.
Pick: Kings (12 and under)

ADVERTISEMENT

Bulls vs Cheetahs
Victor Matfield wrote in his book that the Cheetahs are a team the Bulls “should always beat”. He had a point when he was playing. Neither team has really impressed this season and both have similar weaknesses. If there’s one area where the Bulls may hold an edge it’s not the traditional tight five but in the midfield, where the sharper attackers and stronger defenders will be wearing blue jerseys. I’ll have the Bulls but not by much, and it might be a hard watch.
Pick: Bulls (12 and under)

Waratahs vs Rebels
Before the season began punters would have been expecting the Rebels to be little more than road-kill as the Waratahs steamed ever-onwards in search of the conference title, but things have panned out very differently. The Waratahs’ tight five is weaker than it has been for many years, and it’s telling. The Rebels, conversely, are good up front but they have little on offer behind the scrum. If the Waratahs have a decisive edge anywhere, it’s from 9 to 15. Bernard Foley should also give the Waratahs stability off the tee, which was missing when Kurtley Beale was doing the job, and Jack Debreczeni for the Rebels is also hit-and-miss. With both teams having so much to prove I’m not expecting pretty, or even watchable, but I do think the Waratahs might edge it by a couple of points.
Pick: Waratahs (12 and under)

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search