Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Paul the Super Rugby Oracle’s Round 7 Tips: An Easy Weekend... Or Is It?

cj

Rugby Pass stats guru Paul Neazor weighs up this weekend’s round of Super Rugby matches and reveals his tips.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ask any sports tipster and they’ll all tell you the same thing: it’s the little wins that keep you sane. So instead of focusing on the three matches Paul got wrong last week (Lions vs Crusaders, Brumbies vs Chiefs, and Waratahs vs Rebels) let us instead celebrate the minor triumph of his first correct Blues call of 2016. A really proud moment. 4/7 on the week takes Paul’s season record to 35/48 for a success percentage of 73%. Round 7’s slate of games appear – on paper, at least – fairly straightforward to pick. Here are Paul’s oracular selections.

Chiefs vs Blues
After watching the Chiefs’ demolition job on the Brumbies, you have to wonder where the Blues can challenge them. The answer is probably in defence, as the Blues tackling is normally resolute and heavy – big hits delivered by big men. They will need to mark up for 80 minutes though, as the Chiefs have been killing teams in ten-second bursts. Behind the scrum is where the biggest imbalance seems to lie. Damian McKenzie is in his best position – he always looks more dangerous when allowed to roam around the backfield and inject himself into the line at opportune moments – while Charlie Ngatai is perhaps the form New Zealand player at the moment. Ngatai going up against George Moala should be a huge battle. I have to take the Chiefs here, and I would be thinking about a decent margin too.
Pick: Chiefs (13 and over)

Force vs Crusaders
Perth might not be the Crusaders’ favourite venue – they’ve had some bad days out West in the past – but they’re simply a much better footy team in 2016 than the Force. The Crusaders will have them covered across the park, and any sloppy kicking will come back with interest The Force can’t count on another opponent dropping the ball 20 times as the Highlanders did (the Crusaders had only four fumbles against the Lions), and even then the Highlanders still drew away. The Crusaders will win and should win by plenty.
Pick: Crusaders (13 and over)

Stormers vs Sunwolves
This looms as a total mismatch unless the Stormers decide to rest their entire forward pack. Given the way the Stormers have been bullying some decent eights into submission, and given the Sunwolves struggles at the set piece, the visitors can expect a really tough workout. The Stormers have the best lineout and, in Eben Etzebeth, one of the best forwards in the whole competition; the Sunwolves have the weakest lineout of the 18 teams. The Stormers love bashing sides up at scrum-time, too, another Sunwolves weakness. And the Stormers aren’t prone to doing dumb things and leaving gaping holes in the defensive line; it takes most of an afternoon to break them down even once. If the home side doesn’t win this one by plenty, swabbing will be conducted immediately after the match.
Pick: Stormers (13 and over)

Hurricanes vs Jaguares
The Hurricanes had moments against the Force when they looked really good but, like the Highlanders last week, played down to the visitors’ level rather than burying them. The Jaguares are still coming to grips with the demands of this competition and it’s not something they can learn overnight, even for a nearly test-strength outfit. They won’t make it easy for the Hurricanes, but the game-breakers are wearing yellow shirts and the home forwards can be relied upon to put in a solid shift. It’s also Cory Jane’s 100th game for the Hurricanes, so the team will have that in the back of their minds as added motivation.
Pick: Hurricanes (13 and over)

Reds vs Highlanders
The Reds have the most talked-about scrum in the competition just now. The Highlanders actually have the most stable and most successful, with hardly any of their own ball lost and a decent supply pinched off the opposition. The Reds have nothing else. The Highlanders can kill teams from close in, from long-range, in the air, on the ground, by boot or by sleight of hand … you name it and the Highlanders can do it. If they get a fair go from the ref at scrum time, this one should be quite lop-sided and if the visitors concentrate properly they should run away with it.
Pick: Highlanders (13 and over)

ADVERTISEMENT

Sharks vs Lions
I’m looking forward to this one. The Sharks have a good record but they’ve played pig-ugly all season, while the Lions have been prepared to attack, take chances and occasionally have things blow up in their faces. They, too, have a good record. The Sharks like to get ahead and sit on the opposition through the second half, while the Lions have a more up-tempo, win-some lose-some in attitude, but they’re also hard-headed and increasingly successful. I got it wrong with the Lions last week but I’m prepared to go back to the same well again; an attacking mindset is often better than a defensive one, and here the visitors hold an edge.
Pick: Lions (12 and under)

Kings vs Bulls
The Bulls have won three and drawn one of their last four, yet how they’ve managed that will forever remain a mystery as they’ve looked far from formidable. A decent but unthreatening pack is the team’s best weapon; the backline is workmanlike at best with not a great deal of speed. The Kings aren’t as good as the Bulls, but they try hard all the time and have one of the quickest guys I’ve seen in some time in Malcolm Jaer. Trouble is he seldom gets good running ball, since the Kings backline isn’t all that flash either. Former Bull Louis Fouche is the best of the available kickers and his old mates won’t want to give him too many chances. It shouldn’t matter though; the visitors should be good enough to win, even if it almost certainly won’t be pretty.
Pick: Bulls (12 and under)

Start your free trial of RugbyPass today and watch all this weekend’s games live, on demand and in HD on your TV, PC, Phone and Tablet.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search